Sure he may be getting older but his 'aura' will win him another 3-4 Id say.
What would be cool is if there is a great clay courter developing right now who is about 17 who will explode onto the tour in the next year or so and be the next sort of at least Kuerten-esque clay talent. Imagine if Nadal was also able to conquer him before retiring.
What would be cool is if there is a great clay courter developing right now who is about 17 who will explode onto the tour in the next year or so and be the next sort of at least Kuerten-esque clay talent. Imagine if Nadal was also able to conquer him before retiring.
I honestly believe he'll win 1 more max.
Then you are on crack. I dont even like Nadal and I still laugh at that.
Too bad the new generation is easily the biggest collection of scrubs I have ever witnessed. The biggest "hopes" are serve only Raonic and weaponless Nishikori who gets injured every 5 minutes.
Graf goat u whine too much.U shouldnt be talking
Graf goat u whine too much.U shouldnt be talking
Oh wait, I get it.
As great as Nadal is, there will come a day when it will be all over. He's not going to be French Open champion forever. He will be 29 by the time of the next French Open final, having won his first French Open at age 19.
What would be cool is if there is a great clay courter developing right now who is about 17 who will explode onto the tour in the next year or so and be the next sort of at least Kuerten-esque clay talent. Imagine if Nadal was also able to conquer him before retiring.
Federer was still winning Wimbledon at 31 and is still a contender to win Wimbledon at 33 too btw, and Nadal on clay >> Federer on grass. Given that and the emerging non existent crop of clay courters I could easily see him being atleast a major threat to win Roland Garros until atleast 33.
Let's wait and see if Nadal can get his personal "La Decima" next year.
Forget the fact that Nadal's begun to struggle with nobodies on clay.Federer was still winning Wimbledon at 31 and is still a contender to win Wimbledon at 33 too btw, and Nadal on clay >> Federer on grass. Given that and the emerging non existent crop of clay courters I could easily see him being atleast a major threat to win Roland Garros until atleast 33.
Forget the fact that Nadal's begun to struggle with nobodies on clay.
Forget the fact that Nadal's begun to struggle with nobodies on clay.
Nadal struggled with nobodies at Wimbledon even when he reached 5 straight finals from 2006-2011. Many nobodies, not just once in a blue moon like Nadal might on clay today.
As great as Nadal is, there will come a day when it will be all over. He's not going to be French Open champion forever. He will be 29 by the time of the next French Open final, having won his first French Open at age 19.
Yes mediocre talent but hard working Ferrer would have won the last 3 French Opens if Nadal and Djokovic (and Federer in 2011) didn't exist probably. Into his 30s. Even more a grinder than Nadal, with literally no weapon or overpowering shot in his game at all.
I think he currently has slightly more desire to win Australian Open and maybe Wimbledon....
I think he currently has slightly more desire to win Australian Open and maybe Wimbledon....
No option for 0?
If he is not injured 3 for sure. Even though I put 2 because I think he might be....
He is an animal. Destroyed Ferrer who admitted to quiting and made Novak throw up. Sheer domination.