Is Thiem finally ready to take on Nadal at the FO?

Micheal Federer said:
he should be ready to take it to him at the FO. even though the FO is quite different from the AO, I think now he has broken the mental barrier, he would be able to take it to Nadal at the FO if they meet this year. especially if their meeting occurs before the final.
Click to expand...
Not sure. The problem Nadal had today which i predicted was as bounce was so low Thiem BH would hurt Nadal which it did.

At Roland Garros the high bounce negates the Thiem BH over 5 sets as Rafa can work it over.

Clearly Thiem is Nadals heir apparent. I suspect Rafa gets one more FO this year then Thiem wins a couple after.
 
the whole planet is hoping so...
hands-united-earth-22422223.jpg

but if anyone else wants to denadalize the draw before thiem does, he'll be warmly welcome, of course :)
(yes, <insert the name of the nadal's 1st round opponent>, I'm looking at you!) :sneaky:

#ABTN #NoMoreCheating​
 
Thiem was beaten in straight sets in the 2018 by Nadal and also lost again in the 2019 final 6-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-1. When it's 4 sets and the last 2 sets are a dominating 6-1, 6-1 it's really not even close. So I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Maybe. Nadal will fight until the death for his last best chance at 20 though, so Dominic won't be the hungrier one like he seemed to be today.
 
Depends on how the net cords fall.

But for seriously, RG is different. Rafa still wins there, UNLESS: facing Thiem and Djokovic back to back there would be brutal. I still think Rafa would pull it off with that draw. But it would be much tougher.
 
Look at the slam win-loss stats from Wiki

AO : 61 - 13
FO : 93 - 02
Wi : 53 - 12
UO : 64 - 11

At the non-clay slams he's losing at least 5 times more often. Look at the numbers see how much a difference clay makes, it's night and day. He needs massive, massive decline on clay before he's any where near as beatable as he is at the other slams. Taking account of how well he's looked at this years Aus Open I don't see that massive x 2 decline on clay anytime soon. I know much/anything can happen to a player in a short period of time even so I can't see a cliff edge drop happening.
 
Micheal Federer said:
he should be ready to take it to him at the FO. even though the FO is quite different from the AO, I think now he has broken the mental barrier, he would be able to take it to Nadal at the FO if they meet this year. especially if their meeting occurs before the final.
Click to expand...

I think he was ready last year... until he was forced to play 4-days-in-a-row. I hear they have a roof now, so that won't happen again.
 
40L0VE said:
Thiem was beaten in straight sets in the 2018 by Nadal and also lost again in the 2019 final 6-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-1. When it's 4 sets and the last 2 sets are a dominating 6-1, 6-1 it's really not even close. So I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...

Did you even watch the RG19 quarters, semis, and finals? Including the finals, Thiem played 4 days in a row. The 61 61 3rd & 4th set reflects that. Thiem was running on fumes against a well-rested Nadl.
 
I'd love to see a Rafa/Thiem RG final. I think that Thiem would have a decent shot(maybe 30%) of taking out Rafa. Thiem now knows that he can beat him in a slam. Granted, this is Rafa on clay. But Thiem keeps improving at RG.


2016: made semi, then won only 7 games vs Djoker
2017: made semi, then won 7 games against the clay GOAT
2018: made final, then won 9 games against the clay GOAT
2019: made final, then won a set against the clay GOAT

This is slow but steady improvement.

Thiem racked up some big wins in 2019 and now 2020.
2019 IW: Took out Fed in a tough 3-setter for the title. Fed didn't drop a set until he got to that final. Thiem played great.
2019 RG: He took out Djoker in the semis.
2019 ATP tourney: He beat Djoker and Fed in this tourney. He also took out the defending champ Zverev in the semis.
2020 AO: He took out Nadal.

What's next for this kid? I cannot wait to find out! I'm a fan. I like this kid a lot. He really respects the players before him and people in general.
 
Well, whos to say that Thiem will be better this year on clay?

Nevermind the fact that Nadal owns him at RG, everyone is jumping to conclusions based on a match on a HC.

Thiem was playing great on clay, apparently , the last 2 years he faced Nadal, and came up short.

Theres a huge difference beating him at the AO, taking him close at the USO, and beating him at RG LOL
 
If Nadal loses in 2020 I'd bet $250 he'd win 2021.

The question is Thiem or Novak and Novak might just be hungrier.
 
kevaninho said:
Embarrassing statement.... ' forced '
Click to expand...

You do realize that Djokr should've been DQ'd in the SF for straight up walking off the court before the umpire said anything right? I'm not talking about the 'decision' used to cover it up that was later released by the tourney. I'm referring to Djokr packing his bags and walking off the court without permission. Or did you think someone ranked 80-100 would get away with the same action? AND have the tourney refund the tickets for that session? Fedr/Nadl/Thiem, the women SFs all played thru the sandstorm, but Djokr is exempt? Djokr flexed his muscle there, and Guy Forget caved.

There was plenty of time to finish the match that day, thus either Djokr or Thiem would've had 1 day of rest before the finals. So yes, Thiem was 'forced' to play 4 days in a row.
 
oldmanfan said:
You do realize that Djokr should've been DQ'd in the SF for straight up walking off the court before the umpire said anything right? I'm not talking about the 'decision' used to cover it up that was later released by the tourney. I'm referring to Djokr packing his bags and walking off the court without permission. Or did you think someone ranked 80-100 would get away with the same action? AND have the tourney refund the tickets for that session? Fedr/Nadl/Thiem, the women SFs all played thru the sandstorm, but Djokr is exempt? Djokr flexed his muscle there, and Guy Forget caved.

There was plenty of time to finish the match that day, thus either Djokr or Thiem would've had 1 day of rest before the finals. So yes, Thiem was 'forced' to play 4 days in a row.
Click to expand...

No one 'forces' him to be a professional tennis player. So hes not 'forced' to do anything ... LOL get a grip.
 
40L0VE said:
Look at the slam win-loss stats from Wiki

AO : 61 - 13
FO : 93 - 02
Wi : 53 - 12
UO : 64 - 11

At the non-clay slams he's losing at least 5 times more often. Look at the numbers see how much a difference clay makes, it's night and day. He needs massive, massive decline on clay before he's any where near as beatable as he is at the other slams. Taking account of how well he's looked at this years Aus Open I don't see that massive x 2 decline on clay anytime soon. I know much/anything can happen to a player in a short period of time even so I can't see a cliff edge drop happening.
Click to expand...

Interesting post. And in my opinion Dominic was even lucky to get a set in '19. Mini lapse from Rafa and then sets 3 and 4 were beatdown city.
 
weakera said:
Interesting post. And in my opinion Dominic was even lucky to get a set in '19. Mini lapse from Rafa and then sets 3 and 4 were beatdown city.
Click to expand...

Anyone who looks up the stats will realise just how big the difference is. In non-clay slams a lot of players have beaten him even when there's nothing wrong with Nadal. Even when Nadal makes silly mistakes or 'chokes' off clay I don't count that as something wrong with him, it's more a sign of how less confident his of winning off clay.
 
There’s quite a lot of gap in quality and clutchness that needs to be bridged for Nadal to be beaten at RG by anyone. Even Thiem. Roof may help who knows.


We’ve said this stuff for 3 years straight now after Nadal loses at AO. The only thing this might have done is help Thiem’s mentality a bit.

But you need a lot more than that to beat Rafa at RG. He’s still the prohibitive favorite.
 
Federer and Del Potro said:
There’s quite a lot of gap in quality and clutchness that needs to be bridged for Nadal to be beaten at RG by anyone. Even Thiem. Roof may help who knows.


We’ve said this stuff for 3 years straight now after Nadal loses at AO. The only thing this might have done is help Thiem’s mentality a bit.

But you need a lot more than that to beat Rafa at RG. He’s still the prohibitive favorite.
Click to expand...

Yeah last year it was Chatrier being rebuilt that was going to make a difference. Ultimately until he loses he's going to be favored.
 
Sabrina said:
Clay season is still a couple of months away. Many things could change by that time.
Click to expand...
Nadal's clay season in 2019 was poor by his incredibly lofty standards. Even Fogmeister beat him in the semis of one of Rafa's pet events in MC. He still easily won the FO.

I guess I'll believe it when I see it. Thiem or Medvedev may be physically ready to do it, but mentally beating Rafa on Chatrier is the hardest task in tennis. Thiem could beat Nadal in MC, Madrid and Rome, but that isn't Chatrier.
 
40L0VE said:
Look at the slam win-loss stats from Wiki

AO : 61 - 13
FO : 93 - 02
Wi : 53 - 12
UO : 64 - 11

At the non-clay slams he's losing at least 5 times more often. Look at the numbers see how much a difference clay makes, it's night and day. He needs massive, massive decline on clay before he's any where near as beatable as he is at the other slams. Taking account of how well he's looked at this years Aus Open I don't see that massive x 2 decline on clay anytime soon. I know much/anything can happen to a player in a short period of time even so I can't see a cliff edge drop happening.
Click to expand...
I don't think it quite works that way, myself. Nadal's numbers on clay are ridiculous, but even a slight decline opens up all kinds of doors for other players. He wasn't awful against Soderling, for example. A little flat, lacking in intensity, not getting the best depth on the ball – but he wasn't awful. He wasn't spraying unforced errors everywhere or incapable of moving and playing defense. He was a little flat against a redlining Soderling and so he went home. If he played a sub-par match like that against Thiem, I definitely wouldn't be surprised to see Thiem win. Nadal doesn't have to fall to 2015 levels to be beaten at the French.
 
tudwell said:
I don't think it quite works that way, myself. Nadal's numbers on clay are ridiculous, but even a slight decline opens up all kinds of doors for other players. He wasn't awful against Soderling, for example. A little flat, lacking in intensity, not getting the best depth on the ball – but he wasn't awful. He wasn't spraying unforced errors everywhere or incapable of moving and playing defense. He was a little flat against a redlining Soderling and so he went home. If he played a sub-par match like that against Thiem, I definitely wouldn't be surprised to see Thiem win. Nadal doesn't have to fall to 2015 levels to be beaten at the French.
Click to expand...

Very reasonable post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

tennisaddict
  • Poll Poll
Who is more likely to take out Nadal at FO ?
2
Replies
94
Views
7K
Fiji
Fiji
N
  • Poll Poll
Could Thiem be the key to Nadal's winning the FO 2022?
Replies
28
Views
682
NeutralFan
NeutralFan
beard
Djokovic vs Nadal slam meetings, another way to look at...
Replies
18
Views
603
Hitman
Hitman
BlueClayIsRealClay
Murray going to beat Nadal this year at FO
2
Replies
83
Views
6K
Fedex
Fedex
tennisaddict
Who will be the first in top 10 to take MTO at FO ?
Replies
8
Views
832
Boom-Boom
Boom-Boom
Back
Top