not really.federer used poor shot selection, just like he did back in his junior days. so did murray when he was broken and in the beginning of the twelfth service game.
If you showed a highlight reel of the later stages of the set, you could convince someone it has been an amazing match so far, though, even if that's not the case.
I have no idea what match you were watching. It was quality all the way through just a little weird because of the rain delays. If you thought the tennis was not quality then I would suspect you are one that would rather try to look good on court and lose then just find a way to win.
I have no idea what match you were watching. It was quality all the way through just a little weird because of the rain delays. If you thought the tennis was not quality then I would suspect you are one that would rather try to look good on court and lose then just find a way to win.
I have no idea what match you were watching. It was quality all the way through just a little weird because of the rain delays. If you thought the tennis was not quality then I would suspect you are one that would rather try to look good on court and lose then just find a way to win.
Nope, it wasn't 'quality all the way' at all. There were patches of brilliant tennis, sure, but there were also more than a few incredible displays of ridiculous tactics and absymal shot selection. From both players, but more from Fed than from Murray, hence the outcome.