Dominic Thiem beat Novak Djokovic 6-7(5), 6-3, 7-6(5) in the Year End Championship round robin, 2019 on indoor hard court in London, England
Thiem would go onto lose in the final to Stefanos Tsitsipas while Djokovic would be eliminated in the round robin stage. Thiem would top the group with a 2-1 record, Djokovic would be third with a 1-2 one. The other two players in the group were Roger Federer and Matteo Berrettini
Thiem won 110 points, Djokovic 108
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (71/125) 57%
- 1st serve points won (48/71) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (28/54) 52%
- Aces 6, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (29/125) 23%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (58/93) 62%
- 1st serve points won (42/58) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 9
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (27/93) 29%
Serve Patterns
Thiem served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 8%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 47%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 63 (28 FH, 35 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 18 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- 13 Forced (9 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (63/90) 70%
Djokovic made...
- 92 (39 FH, 53 BH)
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- 14 Forced (6 FH, 8 BH)
- Return Rate (92/121) 76%
Break Points
Thiem 4/4
Djokovic 3/9 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Thiem 43 (21 FH, 10 BH, 7 FHV, 1 BHV, 4 OH)
Djokovic 18 (8 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV)
Thiem's FHs - 4 cc (1 return), 4 dtl (1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 6 inside-out (1 at net), 4 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline/inside-in
- BHs - 2 cc (1 return), 5 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 1 net chord dribbler (with Djokovic at net)
- 5 from a serve-volley points - 3 first volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV) & 2 second volleys (2 OH)
- 2 other FHVs were swinging shot (1 inside-out, 1 non-net inside-in/cc) and 1 other FHV can reasonably be called an OH
- 1 other OH was on the bounce
Djokovic's FHs - 4 cc (2 returns), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl/inside-out pass, 2 inside-in (1 at net)
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl (1 2 passes - 1 not clean), 2 drop shots
- 1 FHV was a swinging, non-net inside-in shot
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Thiem 59
- 45 Unforced (23 FH, 19 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 swinging FHV
- 14 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 2 BH1/2V)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.4
Djokovic 35
- 24 Unforced (12 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 11 Forced (6 FH, 5 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 15/26 (58%) at net, including...
- 5/6 (83%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 retreating
Djokovic was...
- 5/12 (42%) at net, with...
- 1/2 forced back
Match Report
A match as brilliant as it is simple. Baseline action. Thiem attacks with shot-making and power hitting. Djokovic counter-punches and defends. Both do what they do very well. Things are very close. Ending is thrilling. Djokovic has little better of things overall. Thiem wins. Court is quick-ish. QED
Thiem’s on fire for most of 2 and a half sets with extraordinary shot-making. He doesn’t move Djokovic around or use serve to draw weak return to set up his boatload of baseline winners. He just nails them time and time again from routine positions. Off both sides. Run of the mill, standard cc rallies - the kind that’s the staple of every match of the year. And bang - winner from Thiem ends it
That description takes poetic license - serve does set up a few, and Djoko is pushed back by power though not to the sides sometimes. BH partakes but its FH that’s chief executioner. The cc rallies feature particularly good hitting as befits the 2 players and not what you see every match of the year. And Thiem misses his point-ending shots fair bit - score would be 3 & 3 if he didn’t. But there aren’t many matches that invite poetic exaggeration the way Thiem’s blazing guns showing here does
What Thiem does is unsustainable (though he seems to be unaware of that) and fires dying down after 2.5 sets - just going a 6-4 set successfully playing like this would be feat worth a poem - as match nears its end. All that brilliance, only for a mundane ending?
Nope. Things get extremely tense near the end. Not necessarily for good play, but tension isn’t a bad substitute for it at that stage, and forgiveable for a match that’s already run over its cup’s quota for it
Serving at 4-5, on back of first real lull in non-stop hot action, Thiem’s tested to hold by one of Djoko’s best return games, with returns peppering the baseline. He comes through to hold
Djoko follows up with a shocker of a poor game to be broken to love and leave Thiem serving for match. Anti-climactic. Or it would have been, had Thiem not doubled it with an even poorer game to be broken back to 15 - and its onto tiebreak
Djoko opens up 3-0, 2 mini-break lead, though hands 1 back at once. All 4 points end in UEs - 4 of them sloppy, 1 after a terrific rally where Djoko defends like the dickens to stay in before Thiem’s miss
Thiem finds his shot-making and hitting one last time from there to turn around the breaker, and claim it 7-5 in the end. The falling to the ground celebration for a second round robin win (he’d beaten Roger Federer in his first match) is understandable, if a little odd
While Thiem takes all eyes, Djoko does edge action overall
Points won are virtually identical (Thiem 110, Djoko 108 - so dead even at 103 going into the final tiebreak), but Thiem serves 125 of them, Djoko just 93. In percentage, Thiem wins 50.5% of points, serving 57.3% of them
Break points - Thiem 4/4, Djoko 3/9 (5 games)
Thiem’s extra breaks gets him the middle set. Djoko having better of the other two coming through in his figures
1st serve in - Thiem 57%, Djoko 62%
1st serve won - Thiem 68%, Djoko 72%
2nd serve points won - Thiem 52%, Djoko 49%
Djoko winning would be the smarter bet going on that
Serve & Return
… also known as nooks and crannies. Match isn’t centered on the first two shots at all. That doesn’t mean there’s not interesting stuff going on. High among them being Djokovic’s serve being one really weird pot-pourri
Some good first serves (he’s got 9 aces), but a high lot of regulation, not-particularly pacey in swing zone first serves. Some good, damaging second serves, and some genuinely, soft weak ones
Weird. If he could serve better, why doesn’t he? He makes 6/6 first serves in the final tiebreak - only 1 of them is a good, wide one with rest being a step-up from point starter. He’s not doing it to protect second serve, which Thiem doesn’t go after, which is itself weird
Way Thiem plays - dashing winners from routine positions all match - you’d think weak second serves would get the full treatment from him. It doesn’t. Just returns them orthodoxly. When he finally lands a return winner against a weak serve (a BH cc) in the third set, it looks long overdue. Its only his second of the match. He’s hit winners from at least a dozen balls in play that were lower percentage shots than that BH return winner - and there’s about a dozen more similar calibre second serves he just plays back normally
Thiem with a heftier first serve than Djoko, rarely placed too wide. Court is quick-ish at most, nothing too challenging to return
Djoko’s a little off in returning regulation stuff
On the return -
- UEs - Thiem 5, Djoko 8
- FEs - Thiem 13, Djoko 14
Few UEs are bound to come. 8 is on high side for Djoko. Just stock, in-swing zone stuff, usually second serves. Misses the ones he does by comfy distance too, not just an inch or two long, as can happen when going for particular depth
As for quality of returns, Djoko gets his share of typical deep returns against second serves, and bops a few good, wide firsts back with the kind of authority only he seems to be able to against such balls. Just normal, solid stuff from Thiem on the second shot - of consistency and heat
Quite a strange blend
- Djoko’s serve all over the place - strong/weak crossed with 1st/2nd serve - he covers ‘em all
- his normal lot of good returns, with consistency a bit off
- Normal stuff from Thiem on serve - hefty firsts, not too widely placed, but not weak ones either (Djoko serves some of both types by contrast) and return - orthodox, firm returning
Better server is up in the air, Djoko’s deeper returning giving him an advantage on the second shot for Djoko to lead serve-return complex overall
Djoko with 76% - 70% lead in return rate, while typically returning with more force is very good start for him going into rallies. Where…
Thiem would go onto lose in the final to Stefanos Tsitsipas while Djokovic would be eliminated in the round robin stage. Thiem would top the group with a 2-1 record, Djokovic would be third with a 1-2 one. The other two players in the group were Roger Federer and Matteo Berrettini
Thiem won 110 points, Djokovic 108
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (71/125) 57%
- 1st serve points won (48/71) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (28/54) 52%
- Aces 6, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (29/125) 23%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (58/93) 62%
- 1st serve points won (42/58) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 9
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (27/93) 29%
Serve Patterns
Thiem served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 8%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 47%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 63 (28 FH, 35 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 18 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- 13 Forced (9 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (63/90) 70%
Djokovic made...
- 92 (39 FH, 53 BH)
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- 14 Forced (6 FH, 8 BH)
- Return Rate (92/121) 76%
Break Points
Thiem 4/4
Djokovic 3/9 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Thiem 43 (21 FH, 10 BH, 7 FHV, 1 BHV, 4 OH)
Djokovic 18 (8 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV)
Thiem's FHs - 4 cc (1 return), 4 dtl (1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 6 inside-out (1 at net), 4 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline/inside-in
- BHs - 2 cc (1 return), 5 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 1 net chord dribbler (with Djokovic at net)
- 5 from a serve-volley points - 3 first volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV) & 2 second volleys (2 OH)
- 2 other FHVs were swinging shot (1 inside-out, 1 non-net inside-in/cc) and 1 other FHV can reasonably be called an OH
- 1 other OH was on the bounce
Djokovic's FHs - 4 cc (2 returns), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl/inside-out pass, 2 inside-in (1 at net)
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl (1 2 passes - 1 not clean), 2 drop shots
- 1 FHV was a swinging, non-net inside-in shot
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Thiem 59
- 45 Unforced (23 FH, 19 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 swinging FHV
- 14 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 2 BH1/2V)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.4
Djokovic 35
- 24 Unforced (12 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 11 Forced (6 FH, 5 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 15/26 (58%) at net, including...
- 5/6 (83%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 retreating
Djokovic was...
- 5/12 (42%) at net, with...
- 1/2 forced back
Match Report
A match as brilliant as it is simple. Baseline action. Thiem attacks with shot-making and power hitting. Djokovic counter-punches and defends. Both do what they do very well. Things are very close. Ending is thrilling. Djokovic has little better of things overall. Thiem wins. Court is quick-ish. QED
Thiem’s on fire for most of 2 and a half sets with extraordinary shot-making. He doesn’t move Djokovic around or use serve to draw weak return to set up his boatload of baseline winners. He just nails them time and time again from routine positions. Off both sides. Run of the mill, standard cc rallies - the kind that’s the staple of every match of the year. And bang - winner from Thiem ends it
That description takes poetic license - serve does set up a few, and Djoko is pushed back by power though not to the sides sometimes. BH partakes but its FH that’s chief executioner. The cc rallies feature particularly good hitting as befits the 2 players and not what you see every match of the year. And Thiem misses his point-ending shots fair bit - score would be 3 & 3 if he didn’t. But there aren’t many matches that invite poetic exaggeration the way Thiem’s blazing guns showing here does
What Thiem does is unsustainable (though he seems to be unaware of that) and fires dying down after 2.5 sets - just going a 6-4 set successfully playing like this would be feat worth a poem - as match nears its end. All that brilliance, only for a mundane ending?
Nope. Things get extremely tense near the end. Not necessarily for good play, but tension isn’t a bad substitute for it at that stage, and forgiveable for a match that’s already run over its cup’s quota for it
Serving at 4-5, on back of first real lull in non-stop hot action, Thiem’s tested to hold by one of Djoko’s best return games, with returns peppering the baseline. He comes through to hold
Djoko follows up with a shocker of a poor game to be broken to love and leave Thiem serving for match. Anti-climactic. Or it would have been, had Thiem not doubled it with an even poorer game to be broken back to 15 - and its onto tiebreak
Djoko opens up 3-0, 2 mini-break lead, though hands 1 back at once. All 4 points end in UEs - 4 of them sloppy, 1 after a terrific rally where Djoko defends like the dickens to stay in before Thiem’s miss
Thiem finds his shot-making and hitting one last time from there to turn around the breaker, and claim it 7-5 in the end. The falling to the ground celebration for a second round robin win (he’d beaten Roger Federer in his first match) is understandable, if a little odd
While Thiem takes all eyes, Djoko does edge action overall
Points won are virtually identical (Thiem 110, Djoko 108 - so dead even at 103 going into the final tiebreak), but Thiem serves 125 of them, Djoko just 93. In percentage, Thiem wins 50.5% of points, serving 57.3% of them
Break points - Thiem 4/4, Djoko 3/9 (5 games)
Thiem’s extra breaks gets him the middle set. Djoko having better of the other two coming through in his figures
1st serve in - Thiem 57%, Djoko 62%
1st serve won - Thiem 68%, Djoko 72%
2nd serve points won - Thiem 52%, Djoko 49%
Djoko winning would be the smarter bet going on that
Serve & Return
… also known as nooks and crannies. Match isn’t centered on the first two shots at all. That doesn’t mean there’s not interesting stuff going on. High among them being Djokovic’s serve being one really weird pot-pourri
Some good first serves (he’s got 9 aces), but a high lot of regulation, not-particularly pacey in swing zone first serves. Some good, damaging second serves, and some genuinely, soft weak ones
Weird. If he could serve better, why doesn’t he? He makes 6/6 first serves in the final tiebreak - only 1 of them is a good, wide one with rest being a step-up from point starter. He’s not doing it to protect second serve, which Thiem doesn’t go after, which is itself weird
Way Thiem plays - dashing winners from routine positions all match - you’d think weak second serves would get the full treatment from him. It doesn’t. Just returns them orthodoxly. When he finally lands a return winner against a weak serve (a BH cc) in the third set, it looks long overdue. Its only his second of the match. He’s hit winners from at least a dozen balls in play that were lower percentage shots than that BH return winner - and there’s about a dozen more similar calibre second serves he just plays back normally
Thiem with a heftier first serve than Djoko, rarely placed too wide. Court is quick-ish at most, nothing too challenging to return
Djoko’s a little off in returning regulation stuff
On the return -
- UEs - Thiem 5, Djoko 8
- FEs - Thiem 13, Djoko 14
Few UEs are bound to come. 8 is on high side for Djoko. Just stock, in-swing zone stuff, usually second serves. Misses the ones he does by comfy distance too, not just an inch or two long, as can happen when going for particular depth
As for quality of returns, Djoko gets his share of typical deep returns against second serves, and bops a few good, wide firsts back with the kind of authority only he seems to be able to against such balls. Just normal, solid stuff from Thiem on the second shot - of consistency and heat
Quite a strange blend
- Djoko’s serve all over the place - strong/weak crossed with 1st/2nd serve - he covers ‘em all
- his normal lot of good returns, with consistency a bit off
- Normal stuff from Thiem on serve - hefty firsts, not too widely placed, but not weak ones either (Djoko serves some of both types by contrast) and return - orthodox, firm returning
Better server is up in the air, Djoko’s deeper returning giving him an advantage on the second shot for Djoko to lead serve-return complex overall
Djoko with 76% - 70% lead in return rate, while typically returning with more force is very good start for him going into rallies. Where…