peRFection
Semi-Pro
McEnroe: "Connors loved the fight, Sampras loved to win but Fed just loves to
play! "
ESPN
play! "
ESPN
McEnroe: "Connors loved the fight, Sampras loved to win but Fed just loves to
play! "
ESPN
McEnroe: "Connors loved the fight, Sampras loved to win but Fed just loves to play! "
Funny...but a bit unfair...
You forgot to include all other great players that make this era so much stronger, than 2004-2007.
Add in Berdych, Tsonga, Delpo, Ferrer, and....oops...nevermind...that still adds up to only 17
I've never seen Federer after a loss express joy that he had the opportunity to just play. I think there are actually some top players who love to win but are just happy to be out there and compete (the Bryans come to mind, Agassi in his later years), not sure Roger is one of them.
No love for Roddick's +1? it came after Fed started winning slams in 2003.
I've never seen Federer after a loss express joy that he had the opportunity to just play. I think there are actually some top players who love to win but are just happy to be out there and compete (the Bryans come to mind, Agassi in his later years), not sure Roger is one of them.
someone has too much time on their hands...
I RARELY chime in on any of these topics, but I have to agree that people confuse the "loves to play" with somehow him enjoying losing.
But have you ever seen a player react worse to losing, than federer did at that 2009 ao? I think losing hurts federer more than losing hurts others.
But have you ever seen a player react worse to losing, than federer did at that 2009 ao? I think losing hurts federer more than losing hurts others.
Not sure you understood the context. It dont' think it was meant in the sense of not in the sense of being satisfied to be present at a stage, goof around, count he beans, and go home (Bryan bros). Your Agassi analogy however is closer to Fed's kind of loving to play (which is basically in the sense of loving to do the sport itself, for it's own sake AND still wanting to be rewarded.I've never seen Federer after a loss express joy that he had the opportunity to just play. I think there are actually some top players who love to win but are just happy to be out there and compete (the Bryans come to mind, Agassi in his later years), not sure Roger is one of them.
That was one match, a big match as Fed was trying to tie Pete's record. His emotional breakdown was the release of all the pressure he was feeling. He probably would have cried like that if he won. It just showed how much he wanted it. (As an aside, as much as I love Fed I was disappointed in his loss of emotional control. It was Rafa's day and Fed dampened Rafa's well deserved victory.)
I RARELY chime in on any of these topics, but I have to agree that people confuse the "loves to play" with somehow him enjoying losing. He's out there TO win, but he's out there because he LOVES TENNIS. Period.
That is why I think you will see him play for - perhaps - 'as long as they'll have him', declining or not, as long as he is enjoying himself, he will be there.
His love for this game reminds me a bit of Bill Tilden's love for tennis. 'The gang' found Tilden, dead in his room, bags packed, rackets ready, dressed and hair brushed, ready to go out and play yet another pro tour.........
He was 60 years old.
It's widely reported how Fed just loves the total experience of being a tennis star. He loves the travel. He loves the experience of playing in front of adoring fans. He loves the media. He doesn't consider it a grind. Sampras felt burnt out after all the years on the tour. Not long ago Rafa expressed that he felt burnt out.
I agree with McEnroe (if you talk so much I guess something worthwhile will spill from your lips). Fed just loves playing tennis. I don't know if he would handle retirement well.
I agree with this. Sampras is an introvert type that just hates the media and large crowd. He was god-gifted with tennis talent, but his lifestyle just doesn't suit the limelight of a tennis star. Federer on the other hand loved the life of a tennis star. He doesn't felt burnout out living the life of tennis star. He's like a born tennis star, and will likely play for many more years without getting burnout.
Well and for Fed, what an incredible life...
He's got his wife and kids with him at all times, so he's not missing his family. Fed and Mirka are also European, so they're always closer to "home" than American players are. Not to mention the private jet, 1st class everything during travel, and the fact that most fans and media persons are obsessed with him.
Pete's wife is an actress, so she was traveling as much as he was (though she always seemed to be around for the big stuff), and he definitely didn't enjoy the limelight as much. It wasn't as easy for Pete I don't think.
Mirka does not get the credit she deserves for helping Roger with his career. I sometimes wonder if he would have been as great without her by his side...
I think Fed may be the first slam champion where being married and having children is a help and not a hindrance. Most family men got torn between having their wife and kids away or the distraction when they travel with them. I recall reading a fed interview where Fed said that mirka told him that although she wanted a family with him, it did not mean that his children and family life was meant to derail his tennis success and that she told him she enjoys the travel and being on the road with him and watching him play. I honestly think Fed will play until the children get to the age where they are meant to be in school.
Mirka does not get the credit she deserves for helping Roger with his career. I sometimes wonder if he would have been as great without her by his side...
I think Fed may be the first slam champion where being married and having children is a help and not a hindrance. Most family men got torn between having their wife and kids away or the distraction when they travel with them. I recall reading a fed interview where Fed said that mirka told him that although she wanted a family with him, it did not mean that his children and family life was meant to derail his tennis success and that she told him she enjoys the travel and being on the road with him and watching him play. I honestly think Fed will play until the children get to the age where they are meant to be in school.
Mirka does not get the credit she deserves for helping Roger with his career. I sometimes wonder if he would have been as great without her by his side...
They can afford to hire a full time tutor, no need to settle down during the school year.
I think Federer will probably play until he feels he can't compete for majors. Since he makes almost every semi-final right now and dominates everyone outside the top 10 with ease, that's 3 or so years off by my estimation, unless he gets hurt, which of course is always a possibility.
true, but there is more to school than books , there is also the social aspect. and given that his kids are such road warriors...I dunno..I should hope they'd like the kids to be able to socialize with other children.
of course, I have absolutely no insight into his home life, just my $.02
plus, they're based in europe where friends are just an hour or so away from their doorstep.
i agree but at the same time i think having kids derailed him from a couple slams in the last 3 yrs.
But have you ever seen a player react worse to losing, than federer did at that 2009 ao? I think losing hurts federer more than losing hurts others.
true, but there is more to school than books , there is also the social aspect. and given that his kids are such road warriors...I dunno..I should hope they'd like the kids to be able to socialize with other children.
of course, I have absolutely no insight into his home life, just my $.02
Did you paint that? That is an amazing piece of work. I wish I could frame it, or maybe Federer could help me with that.
Look, I'm a Fed fan and I was embarrassed for him that day. But some things to keep in mind:
1) Fed's had a tendancy from childhood to bawl after losses; his parents have told of searching for him after matches and finding him sobbing in the coat closet. Fed once said he pretty much cried after every loss from age 8 to around 15. And even after that he did it plenty - one of his best friends (and former roommate) Yves Allegro once recounted that the last time he beat Fed in a match they went back to the apartment they shared and Fed was crying on his bed for like half and hour and it really pi---ed him off. You can even find youtube footage of Fed crying during a trophy ceremony in 2001 after losing in the Basel final in straights to Tim Henman.
McEnroe: "Connors loved the fight, Sampras loved to win but Fed just loves to
play! "
Of course, most players cry when they win slam titles. That would be no surprise. But I've never seen a player cry (understatement) on the podium after losing, except for federer.
When asked to compare Federer and Sampras – widely regarded as the best two players in tennis history – Annacone said it was like comparing apples and oranges.
“The most amazing thing I’ve found about Roger is that at 30 years old, his energy level and the sheer enjoyment he gets from this life in tennis is really second to none,” he said.
“Pete’s a different person. He’s a lot more introverted and introspective, and at 30 years old he was a bit tired. Not physically, I think more mentally ... these guys are superstar athletes who travel the world 30 or 40 weeks a year and while it’s great, it’s also tiring, and after a long period of time that can take away from your fuel tank.
“I’ve yet to see that from Roger Federer, so it’s quite a unique talent, I guess one of the many he has. He loves the game and he loves his life.”
Mirka does not get the credit she deserves for helping Roger with his career. I sometimes wonder if he would have been as great without her by his side...
If Mirka is the one who got young Fed to cut off the ponytail and to shave regularly, I hope she has complete and full access to his bank account. He was transformed from a sloppy looking tennis genius to a suave, debonair and prince-like tennis genius. And it's the suave, debonair and prince-like Fed that has banked a lot of $$$.
Of course, most players cry when they win slam titles. That would be no surprise. But I've never seen a player cry (understatement) on the podium after losing, except for federer.
Yep that 2009 ao final was similar to the 2012 Roland Garros final where djokovic and Nadal were both seeking equally life-changing feats.