oy vey
Semi-Pro
Donald young 2.0 > Murray 2.0
Donald beat em remember, theres no excuse for that.
A prime Murray under Lendl!
Donald young 2.0 > Murray 2.0
Donald beat em remember, theres no excuse for that.
wasn't that prior to Ivan Lendl? LOL
Let's see...
Murray + Lendl =
Djokovic
1. Defeated the BEST Returner the game has ever seen, a 100% healthy Djokovic, on Djoker's BEST surface, Hard Court on the world's hardest GS to win under the most unrelenting surface anyoe has ever played the US Open in history, on five gruleing sets, metally stronger and physically more fit.
Federer
2. Dismanteld and dispatched (after a sad loss at Wilmbeldon, wake-up call, waking sleeping Giant), humiliated the World's #1 Player, the GOAT Roger Federer, playing at his highest level, being #1,in the world again, dominating the men's field all year, and better than every other tennis player in the men's game, on his BEST surface, Grass Court, on his HOME turf, Wimbledon Center Court, on the world's largest stage, Olympics, winning the Olympic Gold...nuff said...spin away.....
everyone knows Roger Federer dreamed as a little boy winning the ultimate prize of an olympic gold medal..... you see, wininng wimbeldon is easy for Roger...it's nothing special for him...but that elusive Gold medal burned inside not winning it... like lendl was burning for that one elusive wimbeldon title, and gave it his all but came up short....Roger gave it his all for olympic gold, but Murray 2.0 was too much for the world's #1 and GOAT on his best surface....
Making Andy Murray 2.0 (since 2012 Wimbldon loss) a force for 2013...Nadal is out of the equation....Rosol took care of Nadal's game forever
Welcome the NEW Andy Murray 2.0 to take hold of 2013, winning 2 GS at least.
It's a brand new day, people...it's a brand new day.
Fed is 31 years old dummy. Leave that guy alone. Roddick just turned 30 and felt like he couldn't compete and he was ranked #20. Fed on the other hand is 31 and ranked #2 in the world. That is really impressive. And somehow 1 grandslam replaces all the results in prior events were fed beat murray handedly. If you're going to make a point, make it right and please think before you type. If it's not true or if it's biased, you shouldn't bother writing it down to waste space.
What does 2.0 after their names mean?
Djoko seemed to fight 2 opponents: Murray and the wind. Still, he shanked at really bad times, missed some opportunities (especially in the 1st set TB), slipped a lot (what was up with that?), his movement was nowhere near as fluid as it can be and Murray is a difficult matchup for Djoko to begin with. It's not like this was the first hard court match he had ever lost to Murray and I can guarantee it won't be the last. Their record on that surface is as tight as can be: 6-6 overall and 2-2 this year. However, even with all those problems, I'm convinced Djoko would have won the match if he had not run out of gas completely in the 5th. He's a better fighter in general but the 5th is where those 3 days in a row of play kicked in and he simply had no physical energy left.djokovic played a horrible match.... Federer would take Murray in straight set yesterday.. something is not right with Djokovic.. his forehand, backhand.. slice.. everything seem too much spin with little depth now adays..
wasn't that prior to Ivan Lendl? LOL
Let's see...
Murray + Lendl =
Djokovic
1. Defeated the BEST Returner the game has ever seen, a 100% healthy Djokovic, on Djoker's BEST surface, Hard Court on the world's hardest GS to win under the most unrelenting surface anyoe has ever played the US Open in history, on five gruleing sets, metally stronger and physically more fit.
Federer
2. Dismanteld and dispatched (after a sad loss at Wilmbeldon, wake-up call, waking sleeping Giant), humiliated the World's #1 Player, the GOAT Roger Federer, playing at his highest level, being #1,in the world again, dominating the men's field all year, and better than every other tennis player in the men's game, on his BEST surface, Grass Court, on his HOME turf, Wimbledon Center Court, on the world's largest stage, Olympics, winning the Olympic Gold...nuff said...spin away.....
everyone knows Roger Federer dreamed as a little boy winning the ultimate prize of an olympic gold medal..... you see, wininng wimbeldon is easy for Roger...it's nothing special for him...but that elusive Gold medal burned inside not winning it... like lendl was burning for that one elusive wimbeldon title, and gave it his all but came up short....Roger gave it his all for olympic gold, but Murray 2.0 was too much for the world's #1 and GOAT on his best surface....
Making Andy Murray 2.0 (since 2012 Wimbldon loss) a force for 2013...Nadal is out of the equation....Rosol took care of Nadal's game forever
Welcome the NEW Andy Murray 2.0 to take hold of 2013, winning 2 GS at least.
It's a brand new day, people...it's a brand new day.
I'm a Murray fan but the OP is getting a bit carried away. Murray has just won his 1st Slam in 5 attempts and did it by beating the defending champion, Djokovic. Kudos to him for that.
But the other top 4 players are all multi-Slam winners and all have beaten each other in Slams many times. Murray has yet to beat Federer in a Slam (although he has come close with the Olympic win).
Murray has made a great start by finally finishing the year as a Slam winner but he has much work to do in order to consolidate it and repeat the feat and begin to match the achievements of the other top 4 players. Hopefully the USO win will have given him the necessary confidence to start doing so.