Rafaforehand74
Rookie
At the time the grand slam count was.
Federer 20
Nadal 18
Djokovic 15
Djokovic winning kept the gap between Federer and Nadal to 2 - it was a couple of inches and an ace from being 3. Within three months the gap was down to 1.
A huge moment in the slam race. My feelings were if Federer got to 21, Nadal would never catch him. So at the time it felt that Djokovic winning was the right result for Nadal fans.
But now it looks slightly different.
Federer will surely not get to 21 and its a straight shoot-out between Nadal and Djokovic for the all time male slam winner.
Who did you support at the time? Was it down to the slam race or a preference for either player? And do you think differently now as things panned out.
Interested in any thoughts.
Federer 20
Nadal 18
Djokovic 15
Djokovic winning kept the gap between Federer and Nadal to 2 - it was a couple of inches and an ace from being 3. Within three months the gap was down to 1.
A huge moment in the slam race. My feelings were if Federer got to 21, Nadal would never catch him. So at the time it felt that Djokovic winning was the right result for Nadal fans.
But now it looks slightly different.
Federer will surely not get to 21 and its a straight shoot-out between Nadal and Djokovic for the all time male slam winner.
Who did you support at the time? Was it down to the slam race or a preference for either player? And do you think differently now as things panned out.
Interested in any thoughts.