Using that logic, Federer would never lose another match if he just switched to a 150 sq. in. racquet.
And shouldn't Nadal also switch to a bigger racquet to prevent the constant beatdowns at the hands of Djokovic?
Oh, and Federer wasn't getting the results when he used a PS 6.0 85 because he was young and inexperienced and was a mental basket case, not because of the size of his racquet. I mean, how many people have beaten Sampras at Wimbledon with bigger racquets? Did Djokovic also start winning more this year than in the past because of the size of his racquet? :???: