old prestige vs new prestige

[proxemo666]

I'm trying to get back into the game after a 4 year hiatus. The last racquet I used was the head prestige mid. Those received a beating and I'm looking to buy another pair. Im looking at the liquid metal prestige mids and was wondering how they compare with the old mids. If I liked the old prestige mids, would I like the liquid metal mids? What about feel, touch, etc. Thanks in advance.

 

[Serve-And-Volley]

I like the feel of all the Prestige racquets but if it is possible try to find another set of the Classic Prestiges. The Prestige Classic has better feel and balance at least to me than the new Liquidmetal Prestige does. But if you liked the Classic you would like the Liquidmetal still a good racquet.

 

[BLiND]

Not tried the Original's myself, but from what others say, they are close, but not quite... think the LM's are slightly stiffer overall, with a notably stiffer upper-hoop. Think thats it really. The i.Prestige are a lot stiffer, so maybe give them a try if you fancy something different.

 

[Deuce]

Some here have said that the Pro Kennex Type C Mid is close to the Prestige Classic.

I've not tried a Type C, and so I can neither confirm nor deny the accuracy of this. But you might want to try one if it's feasible for you to do so.

 

[OnyxZ28]

I want to try a Type C. The other clones, the Spalding ATP Pro Stock 200 and the Wilson ROK, played nothing like the Prestige.