Djokovic fans like to rewrite history. It is always amusing.
Stop acting like Lew and RF-18. They are fanboys, what can you expect from them? But why are you being objective? I repeat again: it counts as an OFFICIAL loss, nobody cares what you want to believe. This is not a matter of opinion. Him losing to Busta is a FACT, according to the rules.
He lost a match according to the rules. You are the one who has to get over it. The number of excuses you guys are making for Djokovic is unreal. He lost this match OFFICIALLY. If you can't get over it go cry to ATP for making such rules, not to me.
Yes, it was. How can you argue against official rules? If you want to change them, ask ATP. Until then I will follow the official rules, not the tears of a Djokovic fanboy.He lost his chance to win the USO, that's all I needit wasn't a loss.
He was 100% going to win that match. But, I will continue to say he was losing and was likely to lose anyways to Busta.
These Djokovic fanboys are so annoying. I mean, who are they to change the ATP rules?He was 100% going to win that match. But, I will continue to say he was losing and was likely to lose anyways to Busta.
Why are you triggered, lol?
He was 100% going to win that match. But, I will continue to say he was losing and was likely to lose anyways to Busta.
No one is legitimately going to say he does not have a loss even if he were to win RG.
Lol at calling the official rules "books". Your mate Lew always says that official stats are the only important thing. But suddenly when it doesn't suit the cherry picking of Djokovic fans the official stats become "books".
He is a though. The number of excuses he always makes for Djokovic is unreal.
Technically Fed beat Djoker at WC19 because he won more points. Forget the rules of the game. Fed adds another slam.Lol at calling the official rules "books". Your mate Lew always says that official stats are the only important thing. But suddenly when it doesn't suit the cherry picking of Djokovic fans the official stats become "books".
He did not get beat, but he did lose.
Nadal also would 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% win RG 2015 1/4 final if it wasn't the worst year of his career. So why would we count it as a loss?No one is changing the ATP rules. All you have here is Djokovic, Nadal and Federer fans having common sense and knowing Djokovic would 99,999999% win that match.
Again lol at calling @MichaelNadal a Djokovic fanboy and saying he wants Djokovic to win this FO.
Djoker lost to Krajinovic at the Adria tour.
Nadal also would 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% win RG 2015 1/4 final if it wasn't the worst year of his career. So why would we count it as a loss?
Very true if you can’t count it as a loss, then you certainly cannot count it as a win.Well, you can't count is a win either
All the times when Nadal didn't finish the match due to injury also count as losses. Djokovic's situation is even worse, he broke the rules. This is worse than getting injured. But I never heard any Nadal fan saying that AO 2010 1/4 final against Murray or the Miami 2016 match against Dzumhur shouldn't count as losses. Only Djokovic gets all kinds of excuses.
Djokovic lost a match, but no one beat him
I wonder if @RF-18 and @MichaelNadal believe Djokovic should be called the USO 2020 winner. In their books he already has 18 slams?
You wish?
Better yet, Novak has not lost a completed match against anyone, so far, in 2020
Well if we throw out the rule book...
So now Djoker fans are saying a injury retire is still not a loss?
