ruerooo
Legend
Older Fed hasn't come out with his bio
http://www.amazon.com/Roger-Federer-Story-Quest-Perfection/dp/0942257391
:shock:
:?
Older Fed hasn't come out with his bio
Like "He can't even speak the language", which, for example, we've already seen in this very thread.
(This usually from people who only speak English, and none of the three languages Rafa speaks -- and whose English is also frequently barely passable :roll: -- but I digress.)
So actually, that's more precisely "xenophobic" instead of strictly "racist" (though if I hear one more comparison of Rafa to a monkey, especially since that's the animal to which Rethuglicans frequently compare President Obama, and the racist implications there are unmistakable ....) -- does the shading of meaning there make it all more illustrative for you?
I prefer reading a players book once they have retired, then they can be more honest about things. He carnt really say what he thinks about other players, the atp etc while hes still got to work with these people regularly. I read Andy Murray's book a few years ago and it was the biggest load of crap ive ever seen. Jimmy Connors autobiograpghy which is out next year will be a much better read.
... and an ex-member of the village people.You certainly must be new here if you think aphex hates Rafa. Had you (like most new posters) been a previously banned one with a new name, you'd know what an objective Rafa fan aphex is.
Nope. Did you see the title page of the book Rafa posted? Nadal co-authored it with Carlin.
Oh, my bad...
BTW, that's so interesting many Roger fans(almost all of them are Nadal haters) were more reacting to this news than Nadal fans.
I know Nadal fans are minority in this forum though.
I think they don't like Rafa getting more attention than Federer. Especially when Federer isn't winning.
As opposed to Rafa deflecting attention by releasing a book when he gets repeatedly clobbered by Djokovic when Nadal is supposed to be defending his turf?
Nadal did defend his turf, Roland Garros. Did you really think Wimbledon was Nadal's 'turf'?
You make more money obviously if you release 2 autobiographies. And Nadal's career as been so eventful it is a good idea to produce 2 volumes anyway. This is the first volume. Nadal is smart, obviously on the court, but off it too.
Nadal did defend his turf, Roland Garros. Did you really think Wimbledon was Nadal's 'turf'?
Oh so now Wimbledon is not considered his turf by *******s? For years *******s have been arguing that Nadal is an all surface player and not just great at playing on clay. How convenient!
Nadal has 6 FOs. He has 2 Wimbledons.
Even a ******* can understand that basic math. Wimbledon is Federer's surface and Federer's alone.
That is not my poiint. My point is *******s always try and argue that Nadal is not just a clay specialist
If Nadal was a clay specialist, he wouldn't have won any majors outside of the French Open and would have virtually no tournament titles on surfaces other than clay. Nadal has won the career Grand Slam, for goodness sakes.
Again that is not my point. My point is that many *******s claim Nadal is much more than a clay specialist but now in this thread one of the *******s(Bulzilla or Rafa2005 or whatever his name is today) claims Nadal did not defend this last Wimbledon because grass is not his turf.
Well which is it? Either he has proven himself on all surfaces or he has not. You can't claim grass is not his turf if you claim he has proven himself on all surfaces.
Clay is the surface where Nadal has been dominant since 2005, but Nadal has proven himself on all surfaces because he has won big tournaments on every surface, including all 4 majors.
Well this is going to be mega-controversial. Just as I'm sure Agassi's would have been if he'd provided material to have one ghosted at the age of 25.
As opposed to Rafa deflecting attention by releasing a book when he gets repeatedly clobbered by Djokovic when Nadal is supposed to be defending his turf?
"Djokovic cannot continue form like this so I have no strategy for him just wait for his form to drop"...........pure brilliance
If Nadal was a clay specialist, he wouldn't have won any majors outside of the French Open and would have virtually no tournament titles on surfaces other than clay. Nadal has won the career Grand Slam, for goodness sakes.
Yes, I know that and I agree with you. Still that is not my point here.
Rafa2005 replied to another poster about Nadal not defending this Wimbledon because grass is not Nadal's turf.
How can you claim it is not Nadal's turf if you claim his superiority on all surfaces? When I say "you" I don't mean you personally. I mean anybody or most notably *******s.
To me the fact that he is not defending any titles off clay means that by far his best surface and the place he dominates pretty much solely is on clay regardless of the fact that he has won 2 HC slams and 2 grass slams(which is a great achievement by the way.)
Crisstti;5859274]
He could have beaten him in the Wimbledon final, so I'm not sure he needs to make any changes, other than do better what he's doing.
.Yep. Someone who calls him a clay specialist cannot be taken seriously
In any case, I'd say Nadal played better in Wimbledon than in RG.
Oh, my bad...
BTW, that's so interesting many Roger fans(almost all of them are Nadal haters) were more reacting to this news than Nadal fans.
I know Nadal fans are minority in this forum though.
thx, awesome... i feel like the flattered-est poster !Vive, I used the epicness that is your book cover as my avatar...hope you don't mind...
I hope he discusses his ban from Wimbledon a few years ago.
I hope he discusses his ban from Wimbledon a few years ago.
^^^ I stand corrected.
His ban, which happened to coincide during his absence from wimbledon.
Thanks.
thx, awesome... i feel like the flattered-est poster !
blah blah blah
In any case, I'd say Nadal played better in Wimbledon than in RG.
Rafa is supposed to be defending a lot of his titles, especially on clay, but Novak raised his level and got in the way of that.
Works both ways. You Nadturds are not liking it that Novak is getting a lot of attention, snatched important titles and the top ranking from Nadal.
Your English is pretty good for a Chilean, almost as good as your excuses used in defending your idol. Your posts are eerily similar to someone who shall remain 'nameless'.
btw, good posts for a noob on here, you're a true fan, where were you before July 2011?
Apparently Rafa has never defended a non-clay court GS title, odd, no?
LOL! You are bad! :twisted:
Somehow I have a feeling that will be left out of the book.:shock:
No, that subject is covered in the book, chapter 7 called "I was injured, no?".
What does this John Carlin do exacly? Is he the translator?
there is only chapter on nadal being injured ? Preposterous ! Blasphemy ! It's a outrage, an digrace and an scadal !
Apparently Rafa has never defended a non-clay court GS title, odd, no?
there is only chapter on nadal being injured ? Preposterous ! Blasphemy ! It's a outrage, an digrace and an scadal !
Rafa with John Carlin's son
and a pic of the book
Obviously, it doesn't delve into why it only works for him - must protect the patented method, no?
Hi CMM, will there be a glossary of pictures submitted by you in it? I hope so, you certainly have a few DVDs chock full of them
slow down dude, this chapter was followed by the lenghty Chapter 8:
How I conquered injuries with PRP
This chapter goes into the revolutionary, earth-shaking revelations of how a custom PRP treatment cured his on again off again knee issues. Obviously, it doesn't delve into why it only works for him - must protect the patented method, no?
Chapter 9 - How I conquered dengue fever (and the excessive sweating issues)
I've pre-ordered my copy signed by his doctor, I can't wait to read about this amazing yet humble guy.
Apparently Rafa has never defended a non-clay court GS title, odd, no?