actually that's perfectly correct.
Evidence :
a) No reports of Nadal being injured before the Soderling match.
b) Nadal had completely destroyed Hewitt in the round before. Hewitt took twice the games in 2007 & 2010 at RG than he did in 2009 (10 vs 5). An "injured" nadal doing much better than an uninjured prime Nadal ? yeah, right.
c) Nadal did not take a MTO in that Soderling match. If he had some problem ,he'd have taken one. We know he takes MTOs when he has any injury problem. Quite a few matches serve as evidence for it. If had a problem in the Soderling match, why did he not take a MTO ?
d) No mention of any injury in the post-match conference by Nadal. If there was some problem, he'd have mentioned it later.
e) Actually watch the match. Nadal is moving as well as ever.
Seeing all this, its clear that the knee problem was a concocted story from the Nadal camp afterwards. Alternate facts, if you will.
Here's the interview of nadal right after the match :
https://web.archive.org/web/2009062...erviews/2009-05-31/200905311243796048503.html
Interviewer explicitly asked him:
Q. You looked tired. Do you feelexhausted? Do you feel tired physicallyand mentally?
RAFAEL NADAL: No.
Q. You look a bit tired.
RAFAEL NADAL: No, no, I feel okay.
Now what is delusional is I've mentioned this to you before. You ran away that time. Now, you want to bring it up again ?
(
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...-transition-years.588036/page-8#post-11498096)