Novak Djokovic is the best player in the world. Deal with it!
Raonic had to serve a thundering ace down set point to make Djokovic the best player in the world.
Such a funny world.
Raonic is the deserved winner. He was due a win over Federer after their early close matches in 2012 at IW, Madrid and Halle.
Raonic had to serve a thundering ace down set point to make Djokovic the best player in the world.
Such a funny world.
Yep. People's memories seem to be falling short again.
The second set score simply doesn't compute. Milos broke Federer? Did Fed double fault four times?
It's not the first time Raonic broke Roger. He also did it at Madrid in 2012. He won the first set 6-4 if memory serves me right.The second set score simply doesn't compute. Milos broke Federer? Did Fed double fault four times?
It's not the first time Raonic broke Roger. He also did it at Madrid in 2012. He won the first set 6-4 if memory serves me right.
Unbelievable how it's been 2 years since Raonic last broke Roger's serve.......
Yes, with those 2 occasions being separated by 2 years.Didn't they say that Raonic has broken Fed only 2 times including today ?
Unbelievable how it's been 2 years since Raonic last broke Roger's serve.......
It's about time Raonic started showing big results. He hasn't really lived up to expectations so far.
As for Fed, he's 33. The 20 something top guys should start feeling embarrassed at losing to him. I'm not talking about the field in general but the younger top 10 like Raonic or Nishi ? They should be EXPECTED to beat him at this point...
Well, that's a fanboy's opinion and it's not objective at all. No reason Fed should not be affected by age like everyone else...The bold part is hilarious. While Federer still plays NO PLAYER should be EXPECTED to beat him.
Only one guy comes to mind
Well, that's a fanboy's opinion and it's not objective at all. No reason Fed should not be affected by age like everyone else...
He's just hitting that wall you know? Getting closer to 34. Or are you expecting him to stay in top 5 forever just because he is right now? I think his results are amazing for his age but I also think it's starting to feel normal when he loses to younger top guys. It's getting to be more surprising when he doesn't.But he's still playing great tennis and is #2 in the world. Why should #7 Nishikori and #10 Raonic be expected to beat him?
As someone said in the match thread, Fed seemed pretty passive. Even though I find him boring, Raonic delivered. Good thing there are more exciting matches coming along today.
ROFLMAO @ losing to that talentless mug Raonic indoors. Good lord
Raonic is like Sampras but every flaw is multiplied by 10.
No Sampras had more than just a serve.. Raonic is just another Karlovic or Isner
I didn't see the match, but seems like Raonic just had his day and played great tennis; I thought this would be a tough match for Roger, as Raonic's game seems to have improved and he has that fantastic serve. Of course I wish Federer could have won and kept his chances of ending YE#1 realistically alive, but that's tennis.
Now we can all turn to talking about how Federer is an undeserving #2 because he hasn't won a slam, how can he be ranked ahead of Nadal, Wawrinka, and Cilic.
Raonic is also better on clay than Sampras.
No Sampras had more than just a serve.. Raonic is just another Karlovic or Isner
No Sampras had more than just a serve.. Raonic is just another Karlovic or Isner
Raonic is like Sampras but every flaw is multiplied by 10.
No Sampras had more than just a serve.. Raonic is just another Karlovic or Isner
Raonic may own Federer now. better be careful, upset may happen at wimbledon
Djokovic and Nadal will be next.
After Wimbledon people decided Fed owned Milos. Just forgot about the previous close matches.
Roger couldn't hurt him from the baseline - Raonic is not that quick but he got to almost every ball. I think Roger was a little worn out.