monkeyisland90
Rookie
Just some questions on rating and would like some opinions
1. If there was a pie chart that showed people playing tennis .. what percentage would be 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 etc...
2. Is 3.5 consider good player? Or 4.0 player considered good.. (i definately know 4.5 and above is great players).
3. Estimating, how long does it take for someone to be 4.0 player or even 4.5.
Some people just have natural talent but i'm just wondering a ball park figure.
4. If someone is 3.5 rating is chances of them beating a 4.0 player pretty slim? same for 4.0 to 4.5, 4.5 to 5.0 etc...
5. If someone plays really well one day like 4.0 and above and the next day he plays like 3.0 - 3.5 against a 4.0 player.. on a consistent basis (like this happens to him 50/50 of his matches)... what rating would this be considered?
1. If there was a pie chart that showed people playing tennis .. what percentage would be 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 etc...
2. Is 3.5 consider good player? Or 4.0 player considered good.. (i definately know 4.5 and above is great players).
3. Estimating, how long does it take for someone to be 4.0 player or even 4.5.
Some people just have natural talent but i'm just wondering a ball park figure.
4. If someone is 3.5 rating is chances of them beating a 4.0 player pretty slim? same for 4.0 to 4.5, 4.5 to 5.0 etc...
5. If someone plays really well one day like 4.0 and above and the next day he plays like 3.0 - 3.5 against a 4.0 player.. on a consistent basis (like this happens to him 50/50 of his matches)... what rating would this be considered?