Roddick vs Hewitt, who got more out of their talent?

Ok it is easy to say Hewitt got more out of his talent, because people immediately think that Hewitt was smaller and had much less power and no big weapons and yet he won 2 slams to Roddick's 1 slam.

But when you look at their games in their primes, Hewitt was more talented. He had a much better backhand, much better return of serve, was faster around the court, better tennis brain, better lob. Roddick had a much better serve and much more power, but his forehand was overrated and he had a very poor backhand. So in their primes, Hewitt had more talent especially with his incredible court speed.

In terms of intangibles, yes Roddick had incredible determination and grit to achieve what he did with his limited talent, but for me Hewitt was mentally stronger and had even more grit. Roddick could easily lose focus on the court and get into pointless arguements with umpires. Hewitt was annoying with his "Come on's", but atleast he didn't get into pointless arguements with umpires and never lost his focus.

Looking at their careers, I would say Hewitt got more out of his talent because his prime was shorter and once he lost the court speed, he lost much of his talent and he had lots of injury problems. Roddick was not as talented as prime Hewitt, but Roddick's prime lasted longer because he had the big serve and the power. Roddick's decline was more to do with lack of confidence after losing so many times(he even admitted this) whereas Hewitt's decline was more to do with injuries and being burnt out - Hewitt turned pro at a very young age and chased down every ball in every match and this is bound to take a big physical toll on you. Hewitt's superior mental strength is what allowed him to get even more out of his game than Roddick got out of his game.

So even though prime Hewitt had more talent than prime Roddick, I still think Hewitt got even more out of his game due to his superior mental strength. But they were both Federer's pigeons especially Roddick. Atleast Hewitt can say he beat Federer a lot in Federer's younger days. But Roddick was owned by Federer even before Federer won a slam. Federer didn't start to own Hewitt until 2004. He owned Roddick from the start.
 
N

NadalAgassi

Guest
Hewitt got more out of his game. I am not sure what more he could have done or gotten apart from not having hip problems which he couldnt do anything about. Roddick was way better when coached by Gilbert and made a fatal career mistake which cost him the rest of his career. It was a foolish knee jerk reaction to not winning a slam in 2004, but unless he is a future 10+ slam winner (which he never was) you arent going to win atleast 1 slam every year. I still think he could have been a 3 or 4 slam winner today had he stayed with Gilbert.

As for who had more overall talent it still might have been Hewitt, but Roddick with his playing style would have had more longevity as a top player, and has even with his bad coaching decisions and refusal to play a style suited to his strengths, and the serve is the most effective weapon in tennis even today.
 

SLD76

G.O.A.T.
Hewitt got more out of his game. I am not sure what more he could have done or gotten apart from not having hip problems which he couldnt do anything about. Roddick was way better when coached by Gilbert and made a fatal career mistake which cost him the rest of his career. It was a foolish knee jerk reaction to not winning a slam in 2004, but unless he is a future 10+ slam winner (which he never was) you arent going to win atleast 1 slam every year. I still think he could have been a 3 or 4 slam winner today had he stayed with Gilbert.

As for who had more overall talent it still might have been Hewitt, but Roddick with his playing style would have had more longevity as a top player, and has even with his bad coaching decisions and refusal to play a style suited to his strengths, and the serve is the most effective weapon in tennis even today.

one wonders why he abandoned his style at all. I know he was frustrated not being able to beat Federer, but I wonder why he decided to try and become a grinder.
 
N

NadalAgassi

Guest
one wonders why he abandoned his style at all. I know he was frustrated not being able to beat Federer, but I wonder why he decided to try and become a grinder.

He became a poor mans Nadal with way less foot speed just with a huge serve. It actually worked very well vs the pre new and improved Djokovic, but not against most of the top guys. It is hilarious seeing him trying to outgrind, outmaneuver, and outsteady Nadal from the baseline in some of their matches (the only ones he had any success he went all out on the forehand).
 
Top