Roland Garros Final: [3] Novak Djokovic vs [4] Casper Ruud

Who wins 2023 RG?


  • Total voters
    148
  • Poll closed .

sortof

Semi-Pro
Who can stop novak at wimbledon ? we need volunteers.. he must be stopped from getting the CIG
Wimbledon may be his best shot for another slam title - and eventually his last one. I don´t expect him to win the USO or any other big title thereafter. His fans seem to believe that this could go on forever, but it won´t.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
Nadal is toast and Djokovic is 36. There should be a young great by now like a Connor Mcdavid, Patrick Mahomes, Mbappe etc. There should always be a young great chasing the old guard. Tennis is missing that.
Obviously, Carlos Alcaraz is that player. Very few players have achieved as much as he has at his age, not even Djokovic or Federer. Rune and Sinner may very well turn out to be ATGs as well. Medvedev could potentially reach ATG numbers on hard court once Djokovic and Nadal are no longer in his way.
 

Ray Mercer

Hall of Fame
Obviously, Carlos Alcaraz is that player. Very few players have achieved as much as he has at his age, not even Djokovic or Federer. Rune and Sinner may very well turn out to be ATGs as well. Medvedev could potentially reach ATG numbers on hard court.

Alcaraz is 16 years younger than Djokovic and just **** the bed in the biggest match of the year against an old Djokovic. Medvedev couldn’t even make it out of the first round. Could you imagine a 26 year old Fed going out in the first round? These guys don’t have Federer like shotmaking and flair.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Please - the Big 3 as a group has dominated this sport because they are the GOATs. Nothing is more easy to see than that. The world didn't magically stop making top tier tennis players for 20 years. The Big 3 came in and conquered all the while holding everyone else at bay. Great to have witnessed it and the more that Nadal and Djokovic win just proves how great they are and nothing more. There are a number of players over the past 20 years who would have won a few GS trophies in other eras but they had the misfortune of playing during the Big 3 era.
They've also dominated because the 90's are the weakest crop of playets of all time.
 

THUNDERVOLLEY

G.O.A.T.
You're biased though. You love women's tennis.
I don't think most people share your views.
History has already settled the matter: Court is one of the GOAT players, along with anyone else who won the Grand Slam, so those who failed to win the Grand Slam--the Best of the Rest with the most majors (e.g. Djokovic, Serena, Nadal, et al.) are not GOAT players.
 

jl809

Hall of Fame
Gg Djoker, GSM. Glad that we are finally here and the waiting for the inevitable is over. TCGS is insane, really mad. Amazing achievement. Should be targeting 27-8 for sure with this unreal conditioning
 

jl809

Hall of Fame
Wasn’t able to catch the match until 2-2 final set so missed the insanity of set 1 and the damp squib of set 2 from what I’ve read about afterwards.

The little I saw:

  • Djoker’s forehand >>>> Ruud’s forehand, which considering Ruud is only known for his forehand is hilarious. Djoker’s was a missile smacking amazing winners left right and centre, while Ruud was making me wonder how he ever wins points - essentially seemed like he only hit the forehand CC to where Djoker was already standing, and not only that, he can’t hit a forehand on the stretch / the run???? Every time Djoker dragged him out wide on his supposed favourite shot, he’d hit a ****ty short loopy ball lol
  • Ruud’s BH was far more impressive in the little I saw than I was expecting. It didn’t make UEs and unlike the FH, he was actually prepared to redirect with it??? Crazy stuff
  • Djoker’s serve. DJOKER’S SERVE. Getting Goran to turn it into what it is now is the #1 reason he is at 23 now aside from conditioning. Against anyone who isn’t an elite returner in this field, he is getting so many damn points off it. Even vs Alcaraz he got so many
  • Djoker is the GOAT in spite of his net play. Can you imagine if Goran gets that sorted for him in the next year or two? It’ll be carnage
Thank god I don’t have to quit this forum after all, otherwise there would be no-one to keep up the #NorrieRetireNow bandwagon
 

Tiki-Taka

Semi-Pro
Ole ole ole oleee
Noleeeeeeeeeee
Noleeeeeeeeeee

Many many congrats. He has completed the game unlike anyone before him, and he has done it the hard way. As such, he deservedly stands alone in Slams and so many other categories.

I hope Carlos can win his share while competing against him, but a well playing Novak is always great for the game, so good luck to him in the future events as well.
 

Eureka

Professional
All rise and be upstanding, and take your hats off to salute the record breaking achievements of Novak Djokovic. Much has been said and no doubt will be said, but the simple fact of his illustrious career to date is that he has taken every opportunity to excel, remained focused and committed to do the very best that he can. In achieving this ground breaking record, ND has shown what is possible, and how to achieve it. His achievement is inspirational, not just in tennis, but in sport.

It has taken years of hard work, a steely self belief and impeccable dedication to stand at the pinnacle. Bravo, Maestro.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
I thought Ruud comported himself very nicely. If he can just get a little more stick on the backhand and use it up the line more. He's only won 250s, but I think he has Slam potential. Maybe not a ton of Slams, but I think he could take advantage of the right draw. Kudos Novak, the GOAT. I'm not super enthusiastic about saying that, but there's really nothing else to say.
 

gqnelly

Rookie
Well yeah, and it doesn't have to be for 20 years, just a few.

When the financial crash happened it stopped plenty of tennis lessons for talented teenagers whose parents could no longer afford them, it stopped plenty of very young kids from starting the sport, and a lot of kids who may have been receiving some form of funding would have seen it stop as organisations ran out of money and squeezed their budgets.

We're just starting to see a new generation of players who are skilled, athletic, and have the mental strength to be champions, and I've no doubt that will continue as kids who were very young or born when the economy started improving begin maturing.
How many top juniors and collegiate athletes have we seen that came in with all the credentials in the world only to fail or fall well short of expectations? At some point your MENTAL performance takes over if you are elite. Everyone at the top levels of tennis has good fundamentals. Everyone has access to good coaching. The Reagan Recession and Black Monday may have hurt some families but it clearly didnt stop Agassi, Sampras, Courier, Capriati etc. It also mostly impacted US players (as the global economy was much more siloed at the time). The access to information today makes it so much easier to raise your level. I am a better player today than I was in college. The average tour player is so much better than they were in the 80s and 90s. There was a huge distance between the #1 and the #100 player. Today...I have seen players ranked outside the top 150 play to an incredible level and beat top 25 players. It isnt because the top players aren't great...its because the quality of the guys outside of the elite ranks is absurd. My coach played at Illinois and is an incredible athlete. He has tried to boost his ranking through Futures and Challenger events over the past 5-7 years since graduating and has struggled to gain any momentum. He says the average player is just so good that he has given up trying to break in.
 

Serve&Bash

Semi-Pro
In every sport the great players are playing better and better longer into their careers. The fact that players in the past called it a career in their late 20s and early 30s says nothing about what the big 3 were able to accomplish late into their careers. The guys in the past walked away from the game and that was their decision. The big 3 continued to work on their games and adjust accordingly for any age related deficiencies. Tennis is a sport where the most talented players can adjust their games to hide the gradual age-related decline. Djokovic improved his serve and started hitting through his forehand more. Nadal started hitting everything like 10 mph harder in 2017 and stopped the loopfests he used to get into. Federer improved his already amazing serve, started half volleying from the baseline and attacked the net more often.

Tennis is not olympic sprinting. I fully expect a fit 36 year old with supreme talent like Djokovic to continue his winning ways. When you take care of yourself the way Djokovic does 36 is not geriatric like some people here suggest. In fact, barring severe injuries I expect this to be the trend from now on with players having longer primes.
 

ScentOfDefeat

G.O.A.T.
Nadal is toast and Djokovic is 36. There should be a young great by now like a Connor Mcdavid, Patrick Mahomes, Mbappe etc. There should always be a young great chasing the old guard. Tennis is missing that.
Tennis history doesn't have to conform to the script inside your head.
It's interesting because it keeps changing: we had never had a "big three" before and nobody's complaining about that.
There are a few patterns that sometimes reemerge, but tennis history is not exactly cyclical, it's more like a spiral.
 

ScentOfDefeat

G.O.A.T.
Alcaraz is 16 years younger than Djokovic and just **** the bed in the biggest match of the year against an old Djokovic. Medvedev couldn’t even make it out of the first round. Could you imagine a 26 year old Fed going out in the first round? These guys don’t have Federer like shotmaking and flair.
What the last few years have taught us is that perhaps 36 is not "old" if you're able to obsessively take care of your body like Djokovic (and the other members of the big 3 to a certain extent). "Peak" form doesn't really have a measurable meaning anymore because your form doesn't correlate exactly with how old you are, it's a complicated amalgam of skill sets, health, mental prowess, etc. Wawrinka only reached such levels in his late 20s, and one can arguably say Djokovic is probably more efficient in his 30s than in his 20s. Taking this into account, it's already pretty remarkable that Alcaraz was able to win a Slam in his teens and be a threat in at least two other major events. Perhaps Djokovic is in fact closer to his "peak" than Alcaraz to his, so it isn't such a huge a scandal that he can't beat "old" Djokovic at a Slam. If tennis continues to progress like this, Alcaraz is in fact extremely precocious and his best years won't even be in the next decade, but the one after that. Why do we keep applying 90s standards and age/performance expectations to a game that has clearly changed in the past 30 years?
 

gqnelly

Rookie
Wasn’t able to catch the match until 2-2 final set so missed the insanity of set 1 and the damp squib of set 2 from what I’ve read about afterwards.

The little I saw:

  • Djoker’s forehand >>>> Ruud’s forehand, which considering Ruud is only known for his forehand is hilarious. Djoker’s was a missile smacking amazing winners left right and centre, while Ruud was making me wonder how he ever wins points - essentially seemed like he only hit the forehand CC to where Djoker was already standing, and not only that, he can’t hit a forehand on the stretch / the run???? Every time Djoker dragged him out wide on his supposed favourite shot, he’d hit a ****ty short loopy ball lol
  • Ruud’s BH was far more impressive in the little I saw than I was expecting. It didn’t make UEs and unlike the FH, he was actually prepared to redirect with it??? Crazy stuff
  • Djoker’s serve. DJOKER’S SERVE. Getting Goran to turn it into what it is now is the #1 reason he is at 23 now aside from conditioning. Against anyone who isn’t an elite returner in this field, he is getting so many damn points off it. Even vs Alcaraz he got so many
  • Djoker is the GOAT in spite of his net play. Can you imagine if Goran gets that sorted for him in the next year or two? It’ll be carnage
Thank god I don’t have to quit this forum after all, otherwise there would be no-one to keep up the #NorrieRetireNow bandwagon
I agree with much of what you said with the following slight adjustments:
1. I would say Novak's serve was a weapon well before Goran started coaching him in 2019. I do agree it is a very underrated weapon of his and more often than not, he serves his way out of trouble.
2. You mentioned Novak's "net play". I assume you meant just the overhead. He has a tremendous volley along with a fantastic drop shot.
3. Novak's forehand gets overlooked because his backhand is so potent but lordy begordy he rarely gets the worse of matchups against lethal forehands. It can stand up to any on the tour in terms of horsepower and it is bulletproof in terms of consistency.
 

Serve&Bash

Semi-Pro
Personally, I don't understand why it took this long for Djokovic's forehand to get the acknowledgement that it deserves. Djokovic's backhand is a great shot that is super solid and amazing at redirecting traffic but he can't overpower most players with it. Since he started winning big his forehand has always done the heavy lifting; it is the shot that opens up the court for him.
 
Personally, I don't understand why it took this long for Djokovic's forehand to get the acknowledgement that it deserves. Djokovic's backhand is a great shot that is super solid and amazing at redirecting traffic but he can't overpower most players with it. Since he started winning big his forehand has always done the heavy lifting; it is the shot that opens up the court for him.

Honestly there are very few players who truly have a better backhand than forehand. Wawrinka's backhand also got more praise but his forehand was the main shot he was blowing winners past Djokovic in those slam finals he beat him.

I think anytime a player has a great backhand, this happens, since it is so rare to have a great backhand at all.
 
Kudos to Nole for getting the most slams! Casper Ruud is too nice, he needs to find his inner animal like Stan did.

He might be too nice, but I think he does well with his game and weaponary. I am not sure he can get a lot better than he is.

Honestly he is better exploiting his net game more, as I was surprised how strong his net game in many of his matches here looked. I didn't realize he had that good of potential there. He is best exploring that more and becoming an all court player, as I don't see him getting the better of Djokovic, Alcarez, and Medvedev strictly from the baseline all match long.
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
Why in the world did they not put Joker and Carlos on opposite sides of the draw? What a terrible final with Rudd the dud playing Joker. Men’s tennis is a joke right now there is Joker and Carlos if he doesn’t get injured or cramp. Then there is Med on certain surfaces only.
 

reaper

Legend
He might be too nice, but I think he does well with his game and weaponary. I am not sure he can get a lot better than he is.

Honestly he is better exploiting his net game more, as I was surprised how strong his net game in many of his matches here looked. I didn't realize he had that good of potential there. He is best exploring that more and becoming an all court player, as I don't see him getting the better of Djokovic, Alcarez, and Medvedev strictly from the baseline all match long.

Ruud was outstanding at net in the final, apart from his overheads.
 

muser

Rookie
If Novak does win i will pop on here to celebrate but will not be gloating or insulting Rafa or Roger who i respect immensely. However, i suspect if Novak loses there won't be same respect shown back by many of Roger or Rafa's fans on here.
A Federer fan here who was in awe of the courage Djokovic showed in resisting the covid mandates. I liked him before, but I love him now.
 

Ralph

Hall of Fame
A Federer fan here who was in awe of the courage Djokovic showed in resisting the covid mandates. I liked him before, but I love him now.
Snap. Exactly me. The cr@p they've put him through.
Federer will always be my favourite player, but Djokovic deserves the accolade for all he has achieved. You can't argue the numbers. He's the greatest.
 

muser

Rookie
Federer would be at 26 slams if he had this clutchness of Djokovic.
Federer was as clutch, but had to deal with Nadal. Djokovic had time to study both and find their flaws. Neither has many but father time was catching up to Federer and Nadal's career threatening injuries took a toll. Djokovic has taken full advantage.
 

arnott

Rookie
A Federer fan here who was in awe of the courage Djokovic showed in resisting the covid mandates. I liked him before, but I love him now.

Snap. Exactly me. The cr@p they've put him through.
Federer will always be my favourite player, but Djokovic deserves the accolade for all he has achieved. You can't argue the numbers. He's the greatest.

As a big Federer fan, I was disappointed in Federer not supporting Novak during his ordeal. Lost lot of my respect for Federer. Now I am not haunted my 2019 Wimbledon final.
 

kayapit

Semi-Pro
Must say I quite enjoyed the AO win more than yesterday. The end of the AO and immediate aftermath was so emotionally raw and powerful. Yesterday's long moment prone on the clay and after-celebration felt planned and a little cringe. Very happy Nole won though. GOAT debate concluded.
 

a10best

Hall of Fame
As a vegan myself I know the health benefits. So does Novak Djokovic.
But wait. I know two vegans who do it to: (1) control their weight and (2) because she is an animal activist.
Yet, they still eat some of the wrong carbs, processed healthy foods and high glycemic natural sugars.
It may not affect you in your 20s and mid 30s but those chronic pains and inflammation will eventually occur.
Saying you're vegan is not enough. I believe Djokovic is vegan and doesn't do high glycemic or high carbs (the right way).

Props to him for mentioning Kobe and Mamba mentality in the post-match interview.
 

ChrisRF

Legend
In every sport the great players are playing better and better longer into their careers. The fact that players in the past called it a career in their late 20s and early 30s says nothing about what the big 3 were able to accomplish late into their careers. The guys in the past walked away from the game and that was their decision. The big 3 continued to work on their games and adjust accordingly for any age related deficiencies. Tennis is a sport where the most talented players can adjust their games to hide the gradual age-related decline. Djokovic improved his serve and started hitting through his forehand more. Nadal started hitting everything like 10 mph harder in 2017 and stopped the loopfests he used to get into. Federer improved his already amazing serve, started half volleying from the baseline and attacked the net more often.

Tennis is not olympic sprinting. I fully expect a fit 36 year old with supreme talent like Djokovic to continue his winning ways. When you take care of yourself the way Djokovic does 36 is not geriatric like some people here suggest. In fact, barring severe injuries I expect this to be the trend from now on with players having longer primes.
Fully agree, that's what I'm saying for years now. Even in sprinting things have changed. Someone like Kim Collins ran his personal best with almost 40. And as you said, in tennis it's about much more than maybe being half a step slower. And the physical decline always gets exaggerated anyway. While playing very aggressive nowadays, Djokovic still belongs to the best in retrieving balls. Even if a few players MAY be better in it right now, then it still doesn't mean they will hit a better shot while on the run.
 

JJGUY

Hall of Fame
didn't realize his kids grow big, somehow I still think they are toddlers


djokovic-roland-2023-family-trophy.jpg
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
Alcaraz is 16 years younger than Djokovic and just **** the bed in the biggest match of the year against an old Djokovic. Medvedev couldn’t even make it out of the first round. Could you imagine a 26 year old Fed going out in the first round? These guys don’t have Federer like shotmaking and flair.
Unlike Alcaraz, 20-year old Federer lost in the first round of the French Open and Wimbledon. Clay is easily Medvedev's worst surface, but he did win Rome, which Federer never did in his entire career in 17 attempts. Basically, naming a few match losses does not an ATG unmake.
All the time is an exaggeration and he's won most of his slams after 2014 when Fed got older and no ATGs have come up after him.
Even as Federer got older, he played at an ATG level just like Djokovic has. Djokovic has had to play Nadal, fellow GOAT-contender, his entire career and so "all the time" does apply there. No two men have played each other more times in the Open Era than those two, not even close. After 2014, Djokovic and Nadal have met 6 times in slams and had they not stopped each other there, they would have even far more majors. In comparison, the classic rivalry between Borg and McEnroe only had 4 slam meetings between them for the entire rivalry. Djokovic and Nadal have played each other 18 times in slams total.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
Nadal is toast and Djokovic is 36. There should be a young great by now like a Connor Mcdavid, Patrick Mahomes, Mbappe etc. There should always be a young great chasing the old guard. Tennis is missing that.
It really is crazy that it hasn't happened in any substantial way. There's usually substantive generational overlap - a time when the old gen and the new gen are really competing and exchanging slams. That hasn't really happened in the Big 3 era. The Big 3 era is SUCH a unique era in men's tennis. The length and depth of dominance is just unreal. We're basically on the third younger generation that's supposed to be chasing the old guard. And at this point, all that's left of the old guard is Djokovic - though Nadal was around until last year.
 
Top