So who gets YE?

Who's the 2022 YE #1?

  • 6th time Rafael Nadal

    Votes: 41 62.1%
  • 1st time for CITY

    Votes: 1 1.5%
  • 1st time for DANIIIL

    Votes: 10 15.2%
  • 1st of many for AAAAAAALCARAZ

    Votes: 14 21.2%

  • Total voters
    66
  • Poll closed .

Underdog

Professional
Australia and Canada/USA have backwards regulations like some countries on women's rights. So yeah, it's technically Novak's fault as much as openly gay athletes "choose" to not compete in countries they could be fined/imprisoned.
Saying those are backward regulations are solely your opinion. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s obviously not an agenda against Novak. If he had gotten vaxed, it’d be fine.
It’s a completely different story to that of gay athletes. First cause being gay is not a choice, second he is not facing jail time in an obscure, abusive country, he’s just facing an entrance blockage. You went completely over the top there.
 

Underdog

Professional
Right.

What if a huge tennis tournament were in, for example, a Muslim theocracy, and in order to enter the country you had to sign a sworn statement stating that "there is but one God and he is Allah and Muhammed is his prophet". You can be any religion to enter, but you do need to sign a sworn statement agreeing to that.

A totally easy thing to do. Even easier than taking a vaccine which can have real side effects.

And yet I think we'd all push for that rule to end, or for the tournament to be moved.
You guys are making kind of crazy analogies there to try and justify a nonsense stance from him. Religion, sexual abuse and sexual orientation are a completely different matter to Djokovic’s stubbornness.
 

FrontHeadlock

Hall of Fame
You guys are making kind of crazy analogies there to try and justify a nonsense stance from him. Religion, sexual abuse and sexual orientation are a completely different matter to Djokovic’s stubbornness.

Lol, no they aren't. You just care about one and not the other.
 

Underdog

Professional
Lol, no they aren't. You just care about one and not the other.
Lol, not at all. If it were Nadal who were missing on big tournaments because of vaccination stance, I’d be calling nonsense the same. I actually kind of respect Djokovic’s courage to stick to his beliefs, despite being questionable about ones. Still, calling out an agenda against him, making him the victim and saying he’s being withheld from success is just dirty and delusional
 

FrontHeadlock

Hall of Fame
Lol, not at all. If it were Nadal who were missing on big tournaments because of vaccination stance, I’d be calling nonsense the same. I actually kind of respect Djokovic’s courage to stick to his beliefs, despite being questionable about ones. Still, calling out an agenda against him, making him the victim and saying he’s being withheld from success is just dirty and delusional

It's not an agenda against Djokovic in particular, just like my hypothetical wouldn't be an agenda against any player. It could just be a rule for anyone entering.

We'd still disagree with it, just like nobody should agree with this nonsensical "vaccine" rule in the U.S. that literally nobody cares about.

And again, I say this as someone who doesn't like Djokovic, and who is excited at the thought of a summer without him on court because I'm so tired of watching him.
 

Underdog

Professional
It's not an agenda against Djokovic in particular, just like my hypothetical wouldn't be an agenda against any player. It could just be a rule for anyone entering.

We'd still disagree with it, just like nobody should agree with this nonsensical "vaccine" rule in the U.S. that literally nobody cares about.

And again, I say this as someone who doesn't like Djokovic, and who is excited at the thought of a summer without him on court because I'm so tired of watching him.
Feel free to disagree, mate. Doesn’t change the rules and doesn’t change the fact that this rule only hurts him because he chooses so. The governments ans tourneys are not holding him back, he is.
 

FrontHeadlock

Hall of Fame
Feel free to disagree, mate. Doesn’t change the rules and doesn’t change the fact that this rule only hurts him because he chooses so. The governments ans tourneys are not holding him back, he is.

Agreed. Just like the producer isn't holding the chaste actress back, she is.
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
Saying those are backward regulations are solely your opinion. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s obviously not an agenda against Novak. If he had gotten vaxed, it’d be fine.
It’s a completely different story to that of gay athletes. First cause being gay is not a choice, second he is not facing jail time in an obscure, abusive country, he’s just facing an entrance blockage. You went completely over the top there.

I live in Canada but have 2 other citizenships. There are tangible differences that make Canada and Australia specifically draconian societies. It doesn't help we have abysmal voter turnout and general understanding of politics (mostly unions voting due to 1 policy, etc).

Switzerland, Estonia, Sweden, these are countries on the cutting edge.

America is just trash for public education and archaic government beaurocracy, etc.

So yeah, Novak has a choice but the tour yhis year is a joke for a lot of reasons
 

Underdog

Professional
I live in Canada but have 2 other citizenships. There are tangible differences that make Canada and Australia specifically draconian societies. It doesn't help we have abysmal voter turnout and general understanding of politics (mostly unions voting due to 1 policy, etc).

Switzerland, Estonia, Sweden, these are countries on the cutting edge.

America is just trash for public education and archaic government beaurocracy, etc.

So yeah, Novak has a choice but the tour yhis year is a joke for a lot of reasons
I’m not saying the tour is kind of messed up this year, but 90% of what people’s been claiming to be Djokovic injustice is his choice backfiring.
 

Winner

Professional
The answers in this thread by BGod and FrontHeadlock are just mind-boggling.

To compare

the obligation to get vaccinated (in the midst of a global health catastrophe with millions of deaths) to enter a country
with
structural discimination and sexual assault

is simply disgusting and that's just for the lack of a better word.

It's another example that some people have really left common sense behind in this pandemic.
 

tudwell

G.O.A.T.
Right now it's quite hard to see anyone besides RAFA. If Alcaraz GOATs at some more Masters, he might challenge for it, especially if Nadal somehow fails to win the US Open. Think Med's too far behind. Would need a total Murray 2016 situation to be in the running. Tsits historically sucks in the second half of the season, so I don't think he's a viable threat regardless of being number two in the race at the moment.
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
The answers in this thread by BGod and FrontHeadlock are just mind-boggling.

To compare

the obligation to get vaccinated (in the midst of a global health catastrophe with millions of deaths) to enter a country
with
structural discimination and sexual assault

is simply disgusting and that's just for the lack of a better word.

It's another example that some people have really left common sense behind in this pandemic.
Right now it's quite hard to see anyone besides RAFA. If Alcaraz GOATs at some more Masters, he might challenge for it, especially if Nadal somehow fails to win the US Open. Think Med's too far behind. Would need a total Murray 2016 situation to be in the running. Tsits historically sucks in the second half of the season, so I don't think he's a viable threat regardless of being number two in the race at the moment.

Nadal should not be favoured to win. Granted 17/19 didn't require tremendous form but he was better in those years. If Alcaraz wins Hamburg he'll be closer to Rafa than Murray was to Novak.
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
The answers in this thread by BGod and FrontHeadlock are just mind-boggling.

To compare

the obligation to get vaccinated (in the midst of a global health catastrophe with millions of deaths) to enter a country
with
structural discimination and sexual assault

is simply disgusting and that's just for the lack of a better word.

It's another example that some people have really left common sense behind in this pandemic.

In Canada the average age of Covid deaths was 79 when the life expectancy was 78. I mean, much older people just died in larger and faster numbers. That's a tragedy but not in the same sentence as 1919 or even the 50s-60s pandemics.

This was basically a super flu season.
 

Underdog

Professional
1 Slam shy when blocked from best while Nadal ended up winning it. Time will tell.
Not blocked. Chose not to participate.
It’s crazy how people go over the top to try and make Novak’s absences this year look like anyone’s fault but his. He chooses not to get vaccinated, it’s that simple. These people can’t have their guy miss a single tournament. Nadal has missed so many more due to involuntary issues and I don’t see people victimizing him that much.
if if if… doesn’t exist
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
I disagree. A lot casual fans remember AO not being played much until the 90s, Agassi having drug/motivation problems, Federer beating Roddick a lot early, del Potro getting lingering injuries and everyone will remember 2020-22 for Covid.

That Djokovic who likely owns all the records was blocked from many tournaments in 2022 will absolutely be remembered. Even
moreover if he ends 2023 as #1.
He won't, and let me remind you that your idol is perfectly beatable in Canada, Cincinnati and the US Open.
It's absurd to give someone "free titles," anyway.
:cautious:
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
1 Slam shy when blocked from best while Nadal ended up winning it. Time will tell.
Djokovic has 68 GS tournament appearances and he has won 21 titles, while Nadal has played 65 GS tournaments and he has 22 titles.
The Spanish player is more effective than the Serbian and that is a factual fact.
:cool:
 

Enceladus

Legend
It’s honestly unbelievable how people keep treating Djokovic as a victim this year. Sure, abolishing Wimbledon point hurt him A LOT, but that’s about it. He wasn’t deliberately banned from AO and UsO, he chose not to play in those tournaments. His no Vax stance is, of course, within his rights, but very stupid within itself. Even more stupid when costs him so much. People need to stop this delusional speech claiming he’s being robbed of AO and UsO points.
That said, I think it’s between Nadal and Alcaraz, depending on how many tournaments Alcaraz plays til the end of the year and how well Nadal does in the ones he end up playing, obviously. I trust Nadal to clinch it, tho
Stop reading after this sentence.

Novak isn't blocked from playing tournaments. He decides he doesn't meet the requirements to play them, he doesn't follow the rules. It is his choice to not play them. In addition, this reads like the 1000 points are only cancelled for Djokovic. They are cancelled for everybody.
Since when is it part of the tennis rules to be vaccinated against covid? :unsure:
 

Enceladus

Legend
Djokovic has 68 GS tournament appearances and he has won 21 titles, while Nadal has played 65 GS tournaments and he has 22 titles.
The Spanish player is more effective than the Serbian and that is a factual fact.
:cool:
Nadal missed some Grand Slam events not because of injury, but because of a bruised ego and cited injury as the official reason. Example - Wimbledon 2009, he was rocked by his first loss at RG.
:cool:
 

Enceladus

Legend
Since when a player has a crown and goes against the mandates of an independent government?
:unsure:
In such a situation, the country is not a suitable host for an open tennis tournament. It violates the ethos of the Open era, which is the participation of ALL players who, according to the rules of tennis, ensure their participation.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
In such a situation, the country is not a suitable host for an open tennis tournament. It violates the ethos of the Open era, which is the participation of ALL players who, according to the rules of tennis, ensure their participation.
And that your idol played in a tournament that prohibited players of a certain nationality, was it suitable?
:notworthy:
 

Enceladus

Legend
And that your idol played in a tournament that prohibited players of a certain nationality, was it suitable?
:notworthy:
The ban on Russian tennis players was also not correct, this season is spoiled by politics. But it must also be said that Medvedev, Rublev and others didn't pose as much of a threat to Nole at Wimbledon as Nole did to Rafa at AO.
 

Underdog

Professional
Since when is it part of the tennis rules to be vaccinated against covid? :unsure:
Since in order to actually play tournaments you need to enter the countries where such tournaments are played. Countries have always had border entry rules. Just because your guy doesn’t want to follow such rules, it doesn’t make them political nonsense much less personal agenda against him.
I could say since 2020 cause Covid hasn’t always been around also, but that would be an exaggeration.
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
Right now it's quite hard to see anyone besides RAFA. If Alcaraz GOATs at some more Masters, he might challenge for it, especially if Nadal somehow fails to win the US Open. Think Med's too far behind. Would need a total Murray 2016 situation to be in the running. Tsits historically sucks in the second half of the season, so I don't think he's a viable threat regardless of being number two in the race at the moment.
I think Med will make a run at it… and it depends on Rafa’s health whether he can hold him off.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
The ban on Russian tennis players was also not correct, this season is spoiled by politics. But it must also be said that Medvedev, Rublev and others didn't pose as much of a threat to Nole at Wimbledon as Nole did to Rafa at AO.
But it is that the GS are "open" to all kinds of players, regardless of political bias, regardless of the tennis talk and its results.
If people put an asterisk on the winner of the Australian Open 2022, they should also do the same for the Wimbledon champion this season.
:notworthy:
 

Underdog

Professional
And that your idol played in a tournament that prohibited players of a certain nationality, was it suitable?
:notworthy:
That’s actually wrong, imho. Completely different from Djokovic vax issue too.
Russian and Belarus players have absolutely nothing to do with their countries invading Ukraine. It’s not like they’re involved in politics or actively supported war. Rublev actually showed to be openly against it.
People failed to realized they would be playing an individual sport where they defend themselves and not their country. I’d be fine if they blocked Russia and Belarus from a Davis Cup or Atp Cup edition, but banning players was stupid. This year’s Wimbledon was full of stupidity and Djokovic and the banned players fans are rightfully upset.
 

Enceladus

Legend
Since in order to actually play tournaments you need to enter the countries where such tournaments are played. Countries have always had border entry rules. Just because your guy doesn’t want to follow such rules, it doesn’t make them political nonsense much less personal agenda against him.
I could say since 2020 cause Covid hasn’t always been around also, but that would be an exaggeration.
The requirements of the countries for the enter are not always correct. See the South Africa Open in Johannesburg, where for a certain period of time couldn't play black tennis players because of the apartheid regime.
 

vex

Legend
Novak blocked from 8,000 points, 2,000 points suspended and another 1,000 cancelled (Shanghai).

I mean, this actually is somehow worse than 2020.

But ATP Race is:

Nadal-5620
Tsitsipas-3965
Alcaraz-3910
Ruud-3110
Zverev-2700
Medvedev-2575


Honestly Zverev has no shot based him coming back from injury no sooner than USO if that. Ruud is just, let's not kid.

Alcaraz currently at QF of Hamburg could get 1300 behind Rafa. And given his youth could ein a lot from here to WTF.

I think Tsitsipas has a real chance but would be down to the wire if he won WTF.

And then of course Daniil. He's defending Canada and USO with additionally Cincy SF, Paris F and WTF runner. If he comes close to those points there's opportunity.

Obviously a lot rides on USO but Nadal is not above getting easy points at Paris and WTF if he's close to a clinch.
You’re counting Novak’s self inflicted career suicide as part of his “blocked” points lol?
 

Antonio Puente

Hall of Fame
Nadal missed some Grand Slam events not because of injury, but because of a bruised ego and cited injury as the official reason. Example - Wimbledon 2009, he was rocked by his first loss at RG.
:cool:

Nadal has always found it hard to bounce back from difficult losses. Following AO 2017, he won two of the next three slams and YE#1. Following AO 2012, he flipped the script and dominated Djoker for the next few years. Following RG 2021, he won his next slam after sitting out for 6 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH

Underdog

Professional
The requirements of the countries for the enter are not always correct. See the South Africa Open in Johannesburg, where for a certain period of time couldn't play black tennis players because of the apartheid regime.
Crazy how people compare the most outrageous stuff. Racism and public health measures are not the same thing, dude.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
Crazy how people compare the most outrageous stuff. Racism and public health measures are not the same thing, dude.
********** have lost all shreds of intelligence just to defend their idol.
They have no dignity.
:whistle:
 

Enceladus

Legend
Crazy how people compare the most outrageous stuff. Racism and public health measures are not the same thing, dude.
You don't see the similarities because you don't want to see them. Both are political interventions into sport, both believed to be correct by the host country's government. Here it is beautiful to see how you, the supporters of covid vaccination mandates, slip into using a double standard, when you are confronted with an unpleasant reality.
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
Back to back finals and 3 set losses for Carlos losing out on over 300 points as a result. Still a Final in Cad would help.

Again Nadal appears likely to only play Canada barring early upset and then USO. Alcaraz can pile up points at lower tournaments.
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
Still think it's Nadal's to lose at this point. Anyone that manages to pass him will have to get a Murray 2016 level finish to the season.
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
Still think it's Nadal's to lose at this point. Anyone that manages to pass him will have to get a Murray 2016 level finish to the season.

That statement both underrates what Murray did and overstates how ahead Nadal is now or his prospects moving forward.

A retread on Andy
Won Queens (500)
Won Wimbledon (2000)
Final at Cincy (600)
Quarters at USO (360)
Won Beijing (500)
Won Shanghai (1000)
Won Vienna (500)
Won Paris (1000)
Won WTF (1500)


Meanwhile if Alcaraz wins Canada he could overtake Nadal after USO and if not likely be playing for more points down the line.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
I mean, really guys, who has had the best season so far ?
Had it not been for injuries , Nadal would've probably added IW and a Wimbledon final to his already winning the first 2 slams.
He very possibly has a better clay season if not for the foot too. Yet even with all that , he's still been the best performer this season.
If he's fit for the USO and goes far , there's really no debate who's the rightful number 1.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
You don't see the similarities because you don't want to see them. Both are political interventions into sport, both believed to be correct by the host country's government. Here it is beautiful to see how you, the supporters of covid vaccination mandates, slip into using a double standard, when you are confronted with an unpleasant reality.
This is insane, and something else even worse.
 

Tshooter

G.O.A.T.
This is insane, and something else even worse.

“political interventions into sport,”:rolleyes:

Even if someone is convinced the CDC order is not premised on health concerns (not even faulty but good faith ones) and instead is convinced the CDC believes the border rules are not supported by any health concerns but are purely political (let’s ignore the cynicism of that belief toward the CDC health care professionals) it’s still not targeting sports.
 
Last edited:
Top