tennisbuck
Hall of Fame
Just curious.. would like to see how many people actually think its better without him.
Just curious.. would like to see how many people actually think its better without him.
Worse. Anybody who says otherwise is a hater. I know this is a sweeping statement I'm making but it's no less true because of it.
it's a lot better without the nadal.Haters unusually silent?, half have voted "better" but only posts from people who votes "worse". Odd.
Anyway, it's obviously worse, like it'd be when any top player isn't playing. Not the same as saying a player is greater than the game.
worse, no question.. he's a fabulous player, just as Roger is..
why do people seem to feel the need to like one or the other when they are both so obviously awesome?
ppl are so strange
it's a lot better without the nadal.
... and i say this as a nadal hater !
How anyone can say its better without him is beyond me. 2nd most popular player in the sport, offers intriguing match ups with other players even if you don't like him personally.
Well, I don't like lying, injury faking, players who almost always have an alibi when they lose-I'm "funny" that way.
What do you think about my win-win proposal?
Just curious.. would like to see how many people actually think its better without him.
Nadal coming back is like a toilet that just won't flush.
amazingly accurate and subtle image !Nadal coming back is like a toilet that just won't flush.
It's called 2015I agree but at the same time I also miss seeing Nadal lose. I propose a win win scenario where Nadal comes back and goes onto a record breaking losing streak until he finally decided to retire after losing couple dozen matches in the row.
I think people wouldn't care as much as they do about Federer. I was watching Nadal-Tsitsipas match today at a sports bar and there was not a single person cheering for Nadal. When Tsistsipas was hitting winners, there was an eruption every time. We're talking about a 20 yo newcomer vs 17 time GS champion here. People in general doesn't find Nadal entertaining.
It's not unusual to see ppl root for the underdog/new blood in any sport. Everyone's been rooting against the Warriors and LeBron from making the finals over the past like 2 years now, and legit everyone outside of Massachusetts hates Tom Brady and the Patriots, and will root for any random team out there to knock them down. Overall, it's very normal in sports that unless you're a fan of the powerhouse team/player, everyone would usually want to see the underdog pull through over the Goliath continuing to dominateI think people wouldn't care as much as they do about Federer. I was watching Nadal-Tsitsipas match today at a sports bar and there was not a single person cheering for Nadal. When Tsistsipas was hitting winners, there was an eruption every time. We're talking about a 20 yo newcomer vs 17 time GS champion here. People in general doesn't find Nadal entertaining.
Nadal exists as we know him because of Federer.I think Nadal is much better for the sport then Federer. I am not a Nadal diehard but realistically and in terms of context, I am sorry he does no dance around like a ballerina but I think his image and throwout is more authentic and he is not a hypermarketing machine like Federer.
Federer is not good for the sport because everything revolves around him, Nadal does not have that mindset. Nadal is about winning but not trying to be a big star or take someone else's shine. He brings out the best in his opponents.
Great anal-ogy. Congratulations.People also voted Trump into office soooo...
Nadal exists as we know him because of Federer.
Think that through. No Federer = No Nadal.
Classic! Nobody cared about the peak years of the greatest player in the sport's history. Probably done here, no?Nadal would've happened regardless. Nadal is unique and he is his own person. Nadal brought intensity and gladiator mentality to the sport since Borg and you can't replicate that. Not many people care about the years of tennis when Agassi after retired except Federer fans. It boomed when Nadal started to come into his own around 2007. Nadal shook up the tennis world and made it more popular and gave them their golden age. It acclerated with Djokovic coming on board.
Fedal=Made money and made Federer's legacy better and stamped in tennis history.
Nadal rivilary has made Djokovic happened and a legend.
Nadal is overall better for the sport,he just brings out the best of his opponents.
LOL no lie, I just read this post with Toni's voice in my head due to the profile pic.Rafa means more to the game than maestro