Tennis Warehouse Playtest: KSwiss Speedtrac Shoes

TW Staff

Administrator
Attention Talk Tennis Members:

Exciting news! We have our first shoe playtest in several years. We have a very limited number of KSwiss Speedtrac in men’s and women’s sizes. This playtest is for USA Talk Tennis members only.

If you are interested in applying, please send an email to discussadmin@tennis-warehouse.com with the following information (please no extraneous comments):

Application period closed. Chosen participants will be notified via email by Tuesday, May 9th.

If you are selected, you must reply to our confirmation email and confirm that you are able to perform this playtest.

We select playtesters based on a number of factors, including past performance on playtests, user history and postings in topics similar to playtest category.

*** Your review is due by June 16th by 5 pm PST.***

Posting a full review by the deadline is necessary to remain in good standing for future playtests. Reviews lacking sufficient effort will resort in disqualification from the playtest program.

Please use the following to write your review:

Tennis experience/background:
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Current shoe:
How many hours did you play with the shoe?
Normal Size:
Playtesting Size:

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
-arch support:
-stability/support:
-ventilation:
-sole durability:
-toe durability:
-traction:
-weight:

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

We encourage a lively discussion on KSwiss shoes. We will remove extraneous posts, e.g., “email sent”.

Thanks,
TW Staff
 
Last edited:

Thibb

New User
I have not used a speed shoe in a while. I would love to try these. Low to the ground, light, booty for great lock/support. For a KSwiss shoe they look great. Also a fair price point.
I was thinking the same thing. This is the best looking KSwiss shoe I have ever seen. They look like they would compare to a asics gel res in looks and feel.
 

kvan

Semi-Pro
I was thinking the same thing. This is the best looking KSwiss shoe I have ever seen. They look like they would compare to a asics gel res in looks and feel.
Looks more like a court FF competitor to me, especially with the booty construction and silhouette. I’m currently enjoying the ultrashot 3s, but worry about toe durability on the speedtracs.

Interested to see how these would perform as a match day shoe.
 

Chairman3

Hall of Fame
I'm most curious about the fit as Kswiss typically have a wider toebox which has caused me to shy away.
For a speed shoe, I'd think they might be a little more medium to narrow
 

Dberger820

Rookie
I got my email! Excited for this play test. Haven’t ever worn KSwiss before and like the speed oriented shoes. they look fantastic.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
The Speedtrac playtest shoe just arrived. Very light and comfortable. Length is true to size. My usual size fits perfectly. Doesn't feel like there will be any break in period required at all. I can't detect any hot spots applying pressure to any of the toes. The forefoot fit isn't as wide as the other KSwiss offerings such as the Ultra Shot 3, Hypercourt Express 2, original Big Shot, Big Shot Lites or the adidas SoleCourt Boost but it's more roomy than the Nike GP Turbos, Court Ballistec 3.3, adidas Barricade 7 & 8s. Heel cup is neither too wide or too narrow. My 3/4 length hard orthotic fits just fine. Shoes with a narrow heel cup can sometimes prevent the orthotic from seating properly. I had some discomfort with the CB 3.3s due to the narrow width preventing good level seating of the orthotic. I'll have a chance to wear them for 7 hours on the court tomorrow.

This is the colorway I received.
https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/KS...ipop_Mens_Shoes/descpageMSKSWISS-KMSTWBL.html
rs.php
 
Last edited:

Chairman3

Hall of Fame
Still jealous of those selected, was looking forward to comparing to my regular hardcourt shoe, the Ubersonic 2. (Always a bridesmaid*)
Since those are scarce, I am looking forward to the reviews for these.

*joking, I am very grateful for the playtests I have been selected for previously
 

Fed Kennedy

Legend
The Speedtrac playtest shoe just arrived. Very light and comfortable. Length is true to size. My usual size fits perfectly. Doesn't feel like there will be any break in period required at all. I can't detect any hot spots applying pressure to any of the toes. The forefoot fit isn't as wide as the other KSwiss offerings such as the Ultra Shot 3, Hypercourt Express 2, original Big Shot, Big Shot Lites or the adidas SoleCourt Boost but it's more roomy than the Nike GP Turbos, Court Ballistec 3.3, adidas Barricade 7 & 8s. Heel cup is neither too wide or too narrow. My 3/4 length hard orthotic fits just fine. Shoes with a narrow heel cup can sometimes prevent the orthotic from seating properly. I had some discomfort with the CB 3.3s due to the narrow width preventing good level seating of the orthotic. I'll have a chance to wear them for 7 hours on the court tomorrow.

This is the colorway I received.
https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/KS...ipop_Mens_Shoes/descpageMSKSWISS-KMSTWBL.html
rs.php
Dogger what is your go to shoe at the moment?
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Dogger what is your go to shoe at the moment?
Too many different shoes in the closet at the moment. Wilson Rush Pro 3.0s, Barricades, GP turbos, hypercourt expresses, ubersonic 4, and Lacoste AG LT21 Ultras…I spend alot of time on the court so I’m currently rotating between a pair of barricades, SoleCourt boosts and GP turbos. Don’t have a “go to” shoe so to speak.
 

Fed Kennedy

Legend
Too many different shoes in the closet at the moment. Wilson Rush Pro 3.0s, Barricades, GP turbos, hypercourt expresses, ubersonic 4, and Lacoste AG LT21 Ultras…I spend alot of time on the court so I’m currently rotating between a pair of barricades, SoleCourt boosts and GP turbos. Don’t have a “go to” shoe so to speak.
I switched from Gel Res 8s to Barricades. Wish I had done it sooner. For some reason I thought I needed the tank shoes but the Barricade is so much more responsive.
I’m on this playtest too so I’m stoked to try a fast feeling shoe
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
I switched from Gel Res 8s to Barricades. Wish I had done it sooner. For some reason I thought I needed the tank shoes but the Barricade is so much more responsive.
I’m on this playtest too so I’m stoked to try a fast feeling shoe
The latest Barricade no longer feels like a super heavy duty durability shoe like the old versions used to be. But then again, they aren’t that durable anymore either. Lol.
 

colan5934

Professional
Got mine in this morning. Same colorway as @mad dog1...wish it was the Corridor off-white tone, but who am I to complain? They're a little more snug in the toebox compared to the Resolution 9 and Court FF3 I've been wearing lately. A little low-volume on the height up there. Seems like it will break in, though, and move with my foot. It doesn't hug my skinny ankle as much as I want, but I'll see how they perform on court later today!
 

Fed Kennedy

Legend
First impression:
Light, soft, comfortable. Forefoot lacing looks heavily influenced by Vapor 9.
Slimmer looking shoe than my Barricade. Rides higher off the ground with more cushion but still good court feel.
I’m not sore after 3 consecutive days playing.
Foot is not locked down as snug as barricade. Overall feels like a less serious, less protective shoe.
 

colan5934

Professional
First impressions here. Used them in the gym to break them in and then took them to a hitting session.

Pros:
+ Comfortable
+ Light and bouncy
+ Aerodynamic: quick moving forward…not as good side to side.

Cons:
– lacking lateral stability for me: not terrible but I’m used to more feedback and catch from my shoes.
– they ran a little hot for me. I didn’t notice until I took them off, but it was 65 here yesterday. They might be a sweaty mess in mid-summer.

Looking forward to more time with these. The traction is responsive, and the cushioning gives some extra bounce with excellent protection. Lots of cushion for its weight. Considerably more than my Vapor Pro 1s. I could definitely coach in these or use them in the gym at least. I went back to my Court Ff3s after 30 minutes because I felt lateral stability and launch was lacking. I will spend more time with them though!
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
First impressions here. Used them in the gym to break them in and then took them to a hitting session.

Pros:
+ Comfortable
+ Light and bouncy

+ Aerodynamic: quick moving forward…not as good side to side.

Cons:
lacking lateral stability for me: not terrible but I’m used to more feedback and catch from my shoes.
– they ran a little hot for me. I didn’t notice until I took them off, but it was 65 here yesterday. They might be a sweaty mess in mid-summer.

Looking forward to more time with these. The traction is responsive, and the cushioning gives some extra bounce with excellent protection. Lots of cushion for its weight. Considerably more than my Vapor Pro 1s. I could definitely coach in these or use them in the gym at least. I went back to my Court Ff3s after 30 minutes because I felt lateral stability and launch was lacking. I will spend more time with them though!
What I bolded are the exact same impressions I've had so far.
 

appdach96

Rookie
First impressions after a 2 hour clinic - no break in for me- super light and comfy- the ladies run short so I do go up 1/2 size and fits almost perfect - I do have to cinch the shoelaces more than normal but overall great first impressions!

kT
 
Attention Talk Tennis Members:

Exciting news! We have our first shoe playtest in several years. We have a very limited number of KSwiss Speedtrac in men’s and women’s sizes. This playtest is for USA Talk Tennis members only.

If you are interested in applying, please send an email to discussadmin@tennis-warehouse.com with the following information (please no extraneous comments):

Application period closed. Chosen participants will be notified via email by Tuesday, May 9th.

If you are selected, you must reply to our confirmation email and confirm that you are able to perform this playtest.

We select playtesters based on a number of factors, including past performance on playtests, user history and postings in topics similar to playtest category.

*** Your review is due by {check back soon}.***

Posting a full review by the deadline is necessary to remain in good standing for future playtests. Reviews lacking sufficient effort will resort in disqualification from the playtest program.

Please use the following to write your review:

Tennis experience/background:
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Current shoe:
How many hours did you play with the shoe?
Normal Size:
Playtesting Size:

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
-arch support:
-stability/support:
-ventilation:
-sole durability:
-toe durability:
-traction:
-weight:

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

We encourage a lively discussion on KSwiss shoes. We will remove extraneous posts, e.g., “email sent”.

Thanks,
TW Staff
Hello TW, when is the shoe review due? Overall very grateful to be a part of this!
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Tennis experience/background: NTRP 4.0 C; spend a lot of time on the court coaching

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): All court, aggressive baseliner looking to draw the short ball to come in to attack/volley

Current shoe: I go through outersoles in one to two months so I always have 2 or 3 pairs of shoes in the rotation that I alternate between. In the current rotation at the moment are:

  • Adidas Barricade
  • Adidas SoleCourt Boost
  • Nike GP Turbo
New shoes waiting to be put into service

  • Nike GP Turbo
  • Adidas Barricade
  • Adidas Ubersonic 4
  • KSwiss Hypercourt Express 2
  • Wilson Rush Pro 3.0
  • Lacoste AG-LT21 Ultra
How many hours did you play with the shoe? 20

Normal Size: 9.5

Playtesting Size: 9.5



Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort/fit:
3/5 Cushioning is very good especially for a lightweight shoe so they’re comfortable on impact. Fit is medium all the way through the shoe from heel cup to toe box. I would have liked a slightly wider toe box at the tip (more on this below). The uppers are quite soft and pliable with no hard plastics digging into any part of the foot so they feel comfortable for walking, however, when moving aggressively on the court, the upper doesn’t hug, flex and move with the foot which surprised me given the bootie construction. My heel almost came out of the shoe a few times when attempting to change directions abruptly. Also, I experienced some rubbing and pressure on the medial side of my big toes. The irritation is worse on the right foot. After spending 5 hours coaching in them in one day, the right toe was sore. The K-Swiss Hypercourt Express offers a wider fit in the toebox The adidas Barricades offer a similar width toebox, but the shape around the top fits my toes better. So far after 20 hours, the midsole has still retained all of the new cushioning properties. The midsole does not feel compressed and worn down.

-arch support: N/A I use a ¾ length hard orthotic so arch support was fine. The heel cup was wide enough to accommodate the orthotic and allow it to seat properly. I have had shoes with narrow heel cups where the orthotic would not sit completely flat.

-stability/support: 3/5 With the Speedtrac being a lighter weight speed shoe, I was not expecting great stability and support. If you’re a really, aggressive mover or a bigger, heavier player, you may need more upper support. Outersole stability was very good. I never felt my foot coming close to rolling over, but since the uppers did not hug and move with my feet, I also never felt that locked in support when changing directions or making hard cuts.

-ventilation: 3/5 Ventilation for the Speedtrac was ok. It was on the warm side for me in the 50-80 degree temperature. I was expecting a cooler shoe given the light weight.

-sole durability: 5/5 Excellent! This is where I have been pleasantly surprised. After 20 hours of play, the outersoles are showing far less signs of wear than my adidas Barricades or SoleCourt Boosts at the same stage! The Barricades and SCBs were already beginning to bald on the lateral edges of both shoes while the medial side of the right shoe were already beginning to bald as well after 20 hours of wear. The only seem to be 10-15% worn so far.

-toe durability: 5/5 Excellent! Toe durability under and in front of the big toe has also been excellent. I’m seeing far less wear than expected given the number of hours I’ve put on these outersoles.

-traction: 5/5 Traction has been great. I have not experience any issues slipping on the court.

-weight: 5/5 This is a very light and fast feeling shoe.



General reaction/comments on overall performance:
3.5/5 The K-Swiss Speedtrac is a handsomely designed shoe.The highlights of this shoe are the traction, sole durability and light weight. They feel light and allow you to move fast. It was the fit and support of the upper that let the shoe down. I would love to see K-Swiss improve the fit and support and take a potential hit to weight while retaining the outersole durability and traction.
 

colan5934

Professional
Tennis experience/background: Played in college. Was ranked for part of a season. Now play 5.0 when I play formally which is not often. I do coach ~8 hours a week.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Aggressive Baseliner. I'm most content slapping balls from the back of the court and looking to come forward off of a weaker ball. I don't mind trying my best Djokovic impression sliding out of the corners on defense either.

Current shoe: Asics Gel Resolution 9 and Court FF3 but have used Vapor Pros, Court FF2, Solution Speed FF, Barricades, Vapor Cage 4, GP Turbo, and others in the past 18 months or so.

How many hours did you play with the shoe? ~20

Normal Size: 9.5

Playtesting Size: 9.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
4.5/5 -- I was expecting these to be comfortable just because that seems to be the vibe for KSwiss, and I was correct. They're very well cushioned for the weight - much better better than Vapor Pros and Ubersonics for me. The uppers are soft and pliable, so much it might be a detriment...but more on that later. I had less achey feet coaching for 3-4 hours in these than I do with my Resolution 9s, so this Surge midsole definitely delivers on its promises. Whether it holds up over time remains to be seen. I did find the toebox small at first, but the upper is so flexible it doesn't matter much for me.

-arch support: 2/5 -- The arch in these is not placed well for my foot. I may be biased because the Gel Resolution 9 arch and last seem tailor made for my foot shape, though. I did not feel like my arch was cradled well in these, and though they have a pretty beefy shank and light weight, they felt like it was all me getting off the ground with no snap or help from the shoe. I didn't have pain or fatigue, but I believe once these start to lose some resiliency in the foam I will have to toss an OTC orthotic in or bear the consequences.

-stability/support: 2/5 -- I was left wanting here. They're...just OK. On my first wear, I really felt myself slipping over the sides of the shoe. I thought the uppers just needed some break-in to mold to my foot. On subsequent wears, I experienced the same thing. Though the traction is quite grippy, I was quite hesitant to cut hard out of the corners or slide for fear of slipping out of the shoe or spilling over the midsole. The uppers seem to be too soft and supple and stretch more than they should to support my foot. I have a narrow-ish foot and did use some heel lock lacing with slight improvement, but the bootie construction combined with the soft overlays still led to some insecurity. Maybe a higher volume foot would do better than my narrow-side-of-medium feet and skinny ankles. I've had other bootie-type shoes like the Vapor Knit, Vapor Pro, Ubersonic 2/4, and Head Sprint Pro SFs do quite well for me. With those, the uppers provided plenty of support as they were more rigid and had a limit to how much the knits stretched...or they were reinforced with a fit frame like Vapors. Sadly, that was not my experience with the Speedtrac.

-ventilation: 3/5 -- for the light weight and amount of mesh on the shoe, I expected better. My feet were pretty sweaty after use, and temps never reached above 75 degrees during my playtesting. I didn't notice this while they were on, and they certainly weren't bad. I'd be cautious using these in hotter weather, as I have a tendency to get some blisters when it's really hot and the shoe holds onto moisture, even in well ventilated shoes like Ubersonic 2s or Vapors.

-sole durability: 4/5 -- for the weight class, these are 5/5. Slight balding after the time I've used them on court. All other shoes in this weight class that I've used fall short of the Speedtrac here. For me, it's still not as durable as a Resolution, Vapor Cage 4, or the like, but it's top class for lightweight shoes.

-toe durability: 5/5 -- no issues here. The toe bumper is robust and comes up high without getting in the way. I'm not a huge test for this anymore since I switched from a pinpoint to platform stance on serve, but the toes are basically spotless. Just some light scuffing from dragging my back foot on backhand slices from the corner.

-traction: 4.5/5 -- I wish these had a little more give to slide when I want, but apart from that, the traction is brilliant if I assess it in isolation. When I look at the shoe as a whole, the traction almost gets in the way. The sole sticks when I want it to stick...so they got that right. But, the uppers do not hold my foot well enough when I'm cutting hard. So, the shoe stops, but my foot keeps going. Am I going to roll an ankle or have my foot stick but jam my hip/low back? It sure feels like it.

-weight: 5/5 -- super light. Super fast. They're great if I'm sprinting forward. They don't quite get up off the ground quickly, but once you're going they go fast. It feels more like a running shoe than a traditional tennis shoe on my foot which is great for coaching and some casual hitting.

General reaction/comments on overall performance: 2.5/5 -- I was really disappointed with the Speedtrac. KSwiss definitely got some things right here: weight, traction, aesthetics, durability, comfort. Yes, my average rating between the categories is 3.75/5; however, the detriments weigh more heavily for me than the positives. For me, the uppers are much too soft and flexible to consider this as an option for anything more than coaching or casual hitting. Playing in these at pace will inevitably lead to me either slipping out of the corner or sticking when I should slide, torquing or jamming my hip and low back where I already have a chronic injury. I'm curious to see how this shoe evolves, though. An addition of a plastic frame around the lateral edge of the midsole/upper junction (Ultrashot 3) or a lateral clip/claw (Hypercourts) could make a world of difference here while keeping comfort and speed at a premium.

If you're a social player who wants a cool looking shoe, a recreational doubles player who doesn't have to cut out of the corners that often, a serve and volleyer, or a coach wanting something light and comfortable? This could be a good option for you. I think if I had a wider, meatier ankle I would have gotten more security out of the uppers and liked these more. I still think support would have been a little wanting, but they'd probably be better. There's definitely potential for the Speedtrac to be a wonderful speed-focused shoe with some changes. I'm curious if KSwiss will improve these in coming years.

Edit: I'm curious what Mark from @TW Staff has to say about these. He did the video review solo and seemed to like them more than me. Very possible these were a good fit for his foot and thus these issues I experienced were not present for him.
 
Last edited:

appdach96

Rookie
Tennis experience/background: Played juniors, took 20 years off and now I am a 4.5 that plays mostly doubles.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I have a big serve and like to set up my partner. Come to net but after working a point from the baseline.

Current shoe: I rotate shoes, my current fav/go to shoes are Adidas Ubersonic 4, KSwiss Ultrashot and Adidas Ava Court

How many hours did you play with the shoe? ~25

Normal Size: 7

Playtesting Size: 7.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort:
4.5/5 Like most KSwiss shoes, these were comfy right out of the box. They had a plush feel, especially considering how light they are. The uppers are super soft which was nice for my foot, which is wider at the top than at the heel. I can also wear these on match day, no issues with the heaviness or anything like that. I had no break-in with this shoe.

-arch support: 2.5/5 the arch support did not do well for my almost flat foot, it hurt after the first day playing in them. I had to take out the insoles and put my own in to make it comfy. Once I did that my feet were happy & once again I was happy with this shoe.

-stability/support: 3.5/5..I play mostly doubles on omni courts...I felt safe and comfy in this shoe moving side to side as well as up & back. I will say I felt like I had too much room at times moving side to side and that worried me a bit. I have rolled my left ankle one too many times...I ordered up 1/2 size and it fit perfect length wise but a little too wide at the heel. Once I put my own insole in it fit better but I still needed to really cinch the laces down, which I do not need to do in my other go to shoes.

-ventilation: 4/5 it has still been on the cooler side here in NC which is unusal so these felt good...my feet did not get hot or overly wet with sweat while wearing these. I think the mesh helps.

-sole durability: 4.5/5 the bottom of the sole still looks almost brand new. The sand on the omni courts can wear a sole down fairly quick but these are holding up really well.

-toe durability: 4.5/5 I am a toe dragger on my serve and my forehand....there is some wear showing but overall it is holding up well.

-traction: 4.5/5- I feel like these had great traction but I only played on Omni courts with them...I did slip some but i felt like it was the court and too much sand, not the shoe itself.

-weight: 5/5, this shoe is very light and fast....even putting my own insole in did not change the weight very much, if at all.

General reaction/comments on overall performance: 3.8/5 I overall enjoyed this shoe, but it began to stretch almost too much in the uppers. For the price I would not purchase them again. I will wash them and try to shrink back to the orignal fit as I did enjoy that and have several league matches coming up that I would like to try these out in. I am thankful to TW and KSwiss for the chance to wear/try these shoes. They will be put into my rotation since I mainly play doubles. Thank you again for this opportunity.
 

Dberger820

Rookie
Tennis experience/background: I am a 4.0 male who likes playing singles but find myself playing doubles more as I get closer to 40. I have been playing since I was a kid and play 3-4 times a week, all on hard courts. As I live in Ohio, I play indoors a majority of the year but was able to put some good hours on this shoe outdoors as well due to the recent great weather.
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
I am a baseline player who is not known for speed, but can utilize it to my advantage during matches especially moving towards the net to dig drops shots. My forehand is my biggest weapon and I will try to find it every shot if possible. I tore my ACL a few years ago, so having a shoe I feel confident to move in is very important to me.
Current shoe:
I have played with the ASICS Speed FF2 for the past few years. Before that I rotated between Nike Vapor 9.5s and different ASICS Gel Resolution generations. I was very excited to see how KSwiss’s speed shoe would match up to two very well respected speed shoes from other brands. I have NEVER worn KSwiss shoes for tennis before this playtest.
How many hours did you play with the shoe?
Roughly 30 hours
Normal Size:
11
Playtesting Size:
11

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
Out of the box, this shoe was absolutely fantastic. I gravitate towards ASICS for their cushioning and I would put the Speedtrac shoes right there with the Speed FF2 and a step ahead of the Vapor 9.5s. I did run into two issues that ultimately made this a pretty uncomfortable playtest. The first issue was my right shoe on the inside, just in front of the drag protection the shoe caved (as seen in the picture posted by Fed Kennedy comparing the KSwiss and Adidas above) and caused a blister on my big toe. The left shoe had the same conformity, but my left big toe was unbothered. I found that if I wore Nike Elite socks with extra padding in the forefoot, it was enough to protect my toe. The second issue was the lack of padding in the tongue/lace design. This is also an issue that plagues the Speed FF2s so I always put round laces in. The flat laces caused the top of my feet to bruise, I believe from not having much stretch. This means they were very locked down! Another huge plus of the Speedtracs was the wider toebox than both the Vapor and Speed FF2. While I would sometimes jam my toes when lunging for balls, I never experienced any jamming with these.
-arch support:
No issues here. I do not seem to ever have arch pain in any shoes I wear and this held true with the Speedtracs.
-stability/support:
For a speed oriented shoe, these were the most stable I have ever used. They feel low to the ground like the Vapor 9.5, but I never get the slight rolling sensation I get with those shoes. They just simply felt planted all the time. For baseline play, this was fantastic!
-ventilation:
This was another highlight of this shoe. Even with needing to wear heavier padded socks than I typically do, these shoes breathed easier than my Speed FF2s. Playing indoors and outdoors I never felt like my feet were overheated.
-sole durability:
Another top mark for a speed oriented shoe. After 30 hours, even on abrasive outdoor courts, there was no visible wear to the sole. I am NOT a slider, so I unfortunately cannot comment on what that would do to the sole.
-toe durability:
No issue here. I drag my left toe when I serve and other than mild scratches, no wear to the rubber.
-traction:
At my indoor club, felt likes to build up on the court. This will cause me to slip a few times a match in my Speed FF2’s, even when they are fairly new. The traction on the Speedtracs were locked in from the first hit to my last. I do not remember a single time I slipped while wearing these shoes. Although not a traditional clay court outsole, I believe these would be a great option for people who play with the same shoe on both hard and clay.
-weight:
Very manageable. Similar to most other speed oriented shoes.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

Overall I would rate this shoe a 4 out of 5. The highlights for me were the traction, stability, room in the toebox, and durability. The issues I had were the abrasion from the shoe caving in on my right toe and the lockdown pain from the laces/lack of tongue padding. While I was able to fix the issue with the toe with wearing thicker socks, it is not always ideal. I will be swapping out the flat laces with round laces to see if that helps with the pain on top of the foot. While I enjoyed the shoes overall, I would not purchase them again until they figure out how to make the shoes not cave in on my big toes. These shoes have made me put KSwiss in mind going forward as I know they receive high praise on some of their legacy lines of shoes and I see them often around the club.

Thank you to Tennis Warehouse and KSwiss for allowing me this opportunity to try out these shoes. I love when new gear comes out and getting the chance to be the first person around wearing them was fun and I enjoyed sharing information about them with others on court.
 

jmnk

Hall of Fame
K-Swiss Speedtrac Review

Tennis experience/background: I have been playing tennis for about 30 years starting in my 20's. Never played as a junior. I play singles almost exclusively - as in I would rather practice serves than play doubles. I used to play 4.5 USTA league years ago but these days I play really only non-USTA tournaments (sporadically). Judging from the results against currently ranked players I'm still at 4.5 level on a good day.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I am a baseliner with my game being based on grinding. Compared to other players of similar level I would think my backhand is above average, and my return of serve is the worst. I'm not a serve & volley player - but once I'm at the net I'm comfortable there. Fairly reliable first and second serve. I play on hard courts as well as har-tru, indoors and outdoors.

Current shoe: Yonex Eclipsion 3 for har-tru, Yonex FusionRev 4 for hard courts. It seems Yonex shoes somewhat agree with my feet the best, although the current models are not the greatest. But I'm not married to anything - I've played in Yonex, Adidas, Nike, K-Swiss. For reference - for me the best shoe ever was Yonex SHT 305 - a perfect blend of weight, cushioning, fit, stability, although not the most durable.

How many hours did you play with the shoe? about 20 hours

Normal Size: 9.5 Sometimes I need to go to size 10 as I'm wearing inserts.

Playtesting Size: 9.5 The shoes seem to run maybe just a bit long - although for me it was perfect as I need room for inserts.

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
4.5/5 I loved them from the first time I put my feet in them. You know that feeling when you wear the shoes for the first time and you immediately feel there will be no problems? - that was the feeling I got. No break in needed at all. I love glove-like design with no separated tongue. The heel area is sturdy but perfectly wraps around my foot. No pinching anywhere. Sole is just right hardness, isolates the feet from the hard courts but does not feel too hard either. That was a very pleasant change from Yonex FusionRev 4 - on that Yonex shoe the sole is too soft and while it is comfortable while walking it really is not suitable for running on hard courts. The shoe is very well designed shape-wise, the toe area is just the right width. I was a bit worried it would be as wide as KSwiss Hypercourt shoe that I have as well - that Hypercourt is just too roomy in the front. But Speedtracs are just perfect.
AJFCJaX1BRVQw3gBJgiu_2u7D-HbnmPnH59y-ftTGc-NiIl56KYlYwgvF5NAzbFTgFVVUutCt2Op4LQMwP93_psga9z-JEeN-j__h7v1aY2VTWC2rVQjsM1N2rhoxNuar_WuNjNKwBoNTDUzLtno2r1uk9XvpA=w500-h1029-s-no
AJFCJaXozu5tY16itvVCW6vKgx3IHuop1Sd0ebbEw3ZXdjSaMrq7jik7-XY2HbvSnAbsIj-3k8XAiExd_nDqbmZ7JNCTqrf0KGxZUhH-asUxUfBxVWEWpTBsTIhBLFk2FocoK9CODFENdhbamygpg-neMmQYkg=w500-h1029-s-no

comparison vs K-Swiss Hypercourt, Yonex FusionRev 4 and Yonex Power Cushion SHT ProEx (which I loved)


-arch support: 4/5 - I no longer ever play without additional inserts so as long as the inserts fit nicely into the shoe I'm fine. And they do here. The original Speedtrac inserts are rather thin though. And there's no rigid/sturdy material shaped to support the arch in the mid-foot area you would find on some shoes so you may want to use third-party inserts if you have problems with your arch.

-stability/support: 5/5 - no problems detected here. The sole is fairly wide giving a feeling of a very solid contact with the ground. After lacing and cinching the foot was well protected and stayed in place, no slipping, no rubbing up and down in the heel area.

-ventilation: 3/5 - the shoe is made mostly from synthetic material although it has a mesh-like thingy on the top front. I was expecting a bit better ventilation because of that but it seems that mesh is mostly for looks and maybe less for function. So a slight dig here. But it's not like I was sweating in them either.

-sole durability: 4/5 - hard to say yet as I do not go through the shoes that often anyway, and I just played 20 or so hours in them. I see no signs of wear on the soles yet. Should be fine.

-toe durability: 4/5 - also too early to judge. There's no extra protection in the toe area (not that I would need it anyway).

-traction: 5/5 - No complains at all. Shoes were not slipping on the courts. And the foot was not slipping inside the shoes either. I would not change a thing.

-weight: 5/5 - just great. Mine (size 9.5) came just at 340g, although the left one was 10g heavier. Given the comfort and support they provided, this is remarkable it is such a light shoe.

AJFCJaURAfFRHSGVh1tJRFaJjAZTnsz02obPja0ywiAayPtUPY1jiJnKdBLl8UjPxnD0BeY88YhtTc64GHGlRR40X7YhHIKSUltyqcGG0b3ieQTZBfIZDgZavrDuVivizHodVl1ALtVzW1nlqI4KHKstrpIgGw=w500-h1029-s-no
AJFCJaU4FpE3krBwyc1AoR9_zpWvROcxDtJPqo8PcQPG-hhJjJh3oH2awuSc3SanJEVkLZ_mO8f-8HE8Yxl5N79Z7EGwqTXKqwP1pSAL9qkeJP0ZQO6Up6te_PZ-d6FZ29Av5q7qEl1qVy527dNcHkuozi6bMQ=w500-h1029-s-no


General reaction/comments on overall performance: 5/5 -In addition to all the good things mentioned above. These are great looking shoes. I mean my daughters do not allow me to have any say in any fashion related matters - but they said so themselves. They have very nice extra color touches here and there, look way better than a plain white shoes. I like sole construction - it bends in just the right place for me, but it is sturdy in the mid-foot area, and provides great cushioning on the hard courts. My only complain would be the lacing: the eyelets are not reinforced with anything and there's significant friction between the laces and the shoes. So when you pull on the laces at the top they do not snug the foot because the laces just wont slide, you have to pull/lace at each eyelet. (not sure if I'm explaining it correctly). I'm also a bit worried that those eyelets may break. These shoes are light, very comfortable, provide great cushioning - KSwiss has a winner here. Felt very safe chnaging direction, running left to right, no issues. And it seems they do add that burst of speed when needed - how else would I be able to get to that dropshot :)
 
Last edited:

Chace

Hall of Fame
KSwiss Speedtrac Shoe Review

Tennis experience/background:
I am in my mid forties. I started playing tennis around age 14. My rating is a 4.5 or a TW Talk Tennis 2.5

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): My playing style is an all courter. Mostly rely on my serve and forehand, as well as my foot speed. I will come to the net when the opportunity is there.

Current shoe: Mizuno Enforce Tour

How many hours did you play with the shoe? 15-16 hours

Normal Size: 11.5
Playtesting Size: 11.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
The shoes are really comfortable. No break in required. Definitely more comfortable than the Nike Vapor Pros and Mizuno Exceed Tour 4. Nice cushioning in the heel and forefoot. The uppers of the shoe are very flexible/pliable. I would say my foot is on the narrow side. Overall fit of the shoe was very nice.

-arch support: No issues or problems with the arch. I would say my arch is medium to maybe slightly on the high side. No arch pain at all.

-stability/support: This is where I thought the shoe was a little lacking. I realize that a speed shoe isn't going to be as stable as a Gel Resolution or Barricade. The upper was a little too pliable. On hard cuts and movements, it felt like the upper of the shoe flexed too much. It did not hug my foot enough. With that being said I never had any issues with rolling my ankle or anything like that, I just felt like my foot wasn't locked in when it came to hard cuts and movements and I think that is due to how flexible the upper is.

-ventilation: I'd say the ventilation for the Speedtrac is average. It's been in the upper 80s to low 90s and humid where I am at, which is typical for Fl. For a speed shoe I was expecting the ventilation to be a little better but honestly with how hot and humid it is in Fl your feet are going to sweat and I typically need 2 pair of shoes when playing in the summer months.

-sole durability: Excellent for a speed shoe. Much better than say a vapor pro. I typically buy shoes that have an outsole warranty because I mostly play on hardcourts and wear them out in 50-60 hours of play.

-toe durability: Excellent! No issues here. I am not a big toe dragger. Very little wear after the 15-16 hours of play.

-traction: Excellent traction. I am not much of a slider. I would say the the combination of the excellent traction and how flexible/pliable the uppers are makes it feel like your foot isn't locked in when making hard cuts.

-weight: The shoes are very light. Fast feeling shoe. A shoe i could use all day. I think a coach would find these shoes very comfortable and a nice option when on court all day feeding balls.

General reaction/comments on overall performance: Overall a very nice looking shoe. The shoe is very comfortable, light weight and fast feeling. Excellent traction. The negative is the upper is a little too flexible which I feel leads to a lack of stability and I just feel like my foot isn't locked in on hard cuts and movements. Thank you TW and KSwiss!
 

FoldingChair

Semi-Pro
Tennis experience/background: Now 4.0 former 4.5. Club tennis in SoCal during University and 4 years varsity high school. Now I hit 2x per week with my friends

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Doubles pretty exclusively, strong return game and rely upon volleys and touch at net

Current shoe: Mizuno Wave Enforce Tour
How many hours did you play with the shoe?: 15 give or take a few hours either direction
Normal Size: 10.5
Playtesting Size: 10.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:
For a speed shoe it was more comfortable than a vapor pro 1 which I have extensive exp with. Not even close to the wave enforce tour though. There was enough cushioning where I didn’t feel like my knees were in constant pain like with the vapor pros. I’d say 3/5 for comfort.
-arch support: i have a normal width foot with a normal/medium arch. The bottom of my feet felt ok here. I feel like the shoe was solid in this regard, a 4/5.
-stability/support: This was where I thought the shoe could’ve been better. I thought the uppers had a bit too much flex. I understand it’s a speed oriented shoe but moving side to side and making explosive cuts was a thing where I had to constantly think about the shoe in the back of my mind. The vapor pros, for as much flak as I give those, have better lateral stability. A 2/5.
-ventilation: From what I understand, Kswiss have never been the best ventilated shoes. My feet were running hot for sure. Not terrible but not good by any means. A 2.5/5.
-sole durability: Good here, I like to move a lot. Feet going as much as I can. Minimal wear on the sole from what I could tell. Surprising for a speed shoe! 5/5
-toe durability: I’m very prone to wearing out my toes of my shoes before the rest of the sole. There was a bit of wear happening, not too bad. But still surprising for a speed oriented shoe. A 4.5/5.
-traction: No slip and slide action here. It was a shame though as I felt the traction was there but the shoes actual stability and lateral support of the uppers were not. To me that sounds like impending doom to an ankle. But the traction was good. Not vapor x good but good. 4/5
-weight: Light weight and speedy. It’s a speed shoe, duh haha. I never put it on a scale but it’s lighter than my mizunos. A 4/5.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

Everyone’s mileage varies of course but to me this was an ok shoe. It performs well in some aspects and not so great in others. But for me, I’ll take a stable, comfortable, breathable speed shoe over a durable speed shoe one any day. An ok shoe for me. Thank you for the opportunity to participate.
 
Tennis experience/background: Played tennis in high school, JUCO, and my university's club team. At the moment I also coach a clubs and high schools
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I consider myself a counterpuncher, with some chip and charging mixed in. I by no means am aggressive or hit winners
Current shoe: Asics Gel Resolution 9
How many hours did you play with the shoe? 40 hours, with about 10 of those using them as normal every day shoes and 30 being on court
Normal Size: 10.5
Playtesting Size:10.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort: These shoes are lighter than most shoes, and are way more comfortable. I was able to use them with no break in period, as adidas barricades, nike vapors, and even the gel res 9s need some kind of break in. They are springily roomy, so if you have a wider foot like I do this shoes fits very well. However, if your foot is a bit more narrow it might be too roomy, especially in the toe box area.
-arch support: I don't really have a high arch foot, or flat footed either. I think for the average person the shoe is pretty soft and support did start to dwindle a bit, especially after heavy usage. I eventually replaced the insoles with some sportier ones that held up better. Support is average
-stability/support:For it being a lighter weight shoe, it was really stable. My complaint of some of the newer nike shoes is that it feels like you are "rocking" back and forth, and that is not present in these shoes. The toebox area is not curved upwards too much, and is stable when making sharp cuts all over the court.
-ventilation: Because the shoe isn't really heavy, It is also pretty breathable especially in the toe area. Right above the toe the material is really light, which allows for breathability. It is way more breathable than the Asics gel res 9 or the adidas barricades
-sole durability: If there was any downside to these shoes, it is the durability. The soles are average for a lighter weighted shoe, and lasted about 30 good hours. before you really could feel the loss of traction.
-toe durability: My #1 critique of this shoe is the toe durability Right above the toe area it is rather thin, and started to tear prematurely since the material is thin, much like nike vapors
-traction: Traction is good when the outsoles are in tact. Once the outsoles are wearing down, the tread starts to disappear and so does traction. I never really slipped since I don't make sharp cuts as often or slide, but was noticeable and expected
-weight: Shoes are lighter than the average shoe. I don't have a scale, but this is for sure not a tank of a shoe like the asics gel res or barricades

General reaction/comments on overall performance: Overall, this is a way better nike vapor, and has good room for wider feet. It is not a heavy duty shoe, nor does it try to be. My only complaint is that the cloth-like material used above the toes is too thin and causes the shoe to be worn in a bit quicker than normal. I would recommend these shoes to anyone who doesn't play as competitive or makes sharp cuts on the court. They are light enough to use as regular shoes and comfy enough to want to wear them off court as well.

As always thank you TW and thanks to K-swiss for the chance to playtest some shoes. I have never worn your tennis shoes, but now you have opened my eyes and will look into your line of products as they did hold up and are better than most nike shoes! (Yes, i said it). Thanks!
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Tennis experience/background: Played tennis in high school, JUCO, and my university's club team. At the moment I also coach a clubs and high schools
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I consider myself a counterpuncher, with some chip and charging mixed in. I by no means am aggressive or hit winners
Current shoe: Asics Gel Resolution 9
How many hours did you play with the shoe? 40 hours, with about 10 of those using them as normal every day shoes and 30 being on court
Normal Size: 10.5
Playtesting Size:10.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort: These shoes are lighter than most shoes, and are way more comfortable. I was able to use them with no break in period, as adidas barricades, nike vapors, and even the gel res 9s need some kind of break in. They are springily roomy, so if you have a wider foot like I do this shoes fits very well. However, if your foot is a bit more narrow it might be too roomy, especially in the toe box area.
-arch support: I don't really have a high arch foot, or flat footed either. I think for the average person the shoe is pretty soft and support did start to dwindle a bit, especially after heavy usage. I eventually replaced the insoles with some sportier ones that held up better. Support is average
-stability/support:For it being a lighter weight shoe, it was really stable. My complaint of some of the newer nike shoes is that it feels like you are "rocking" back and forth, and that is not present in these shoes. The toebox area is not curved upwards too much, and is stable when making sharp cuts all over the court.
-ventilation: Because the shoe isn't really heavy, It is also pretty breathable especially in the toe area. Right above the toe the material is really light, which allows for breathability. It is way more breathable than the Asics gel res 9 or the adidas barricades
-sole durability: If there was any downside to these shoes, it is the durability. The soles are average for a lighter weighted shoe, and lasted about 30 good hours. before you really could feel the loss of traction.
-toe durability: My #1 critique of this shoe is the toe durability Right above the toe area it is rather thin, and started to tear prematurely since the material is thin, much like nike vapors
-traction: Traction is good when the outsoles are in tact. Once the outsoles are wearing down, the tread starts to disappear and so does traction. I never really slipped since I don't make sharp cuts as often or slide, but was noticeable and expected
-weight: Shoes are lighter than the average shoe. I don't have a scale, but this is for sure not a tank of a shoe like the asics gel res or barricades

General reaction/comments on overall performance: Overall, this is a way better nike vapor, and has good room for wider feet. It is not a heavy duty shoe, nor does it try to be. My only complaint is that the cloth-like material used above the toes is too thin and causes the shoe to be worn in a bit quicker than normal. I would recommend these shoes to anyone who doesn't play as competitive or makes sharp cuts on the court. They are light enough to use as regular shoes and comfy enough to want to wear them off court as well.

As always thank you TW and thanks to K-swiss for the chance to playtest some shoes. I have never worn your tennis shoes, but now you have opened my eyes and will look into your line of products as they did hold up and are better than most nike shoes! (Yes, i said it). Thanks!
Just curious…how can you say it’s really stable when you also said you don’t make sharp cuts very often? A bit contradictory, no?
 

Fed Kennedy

Legend
Tennis experience/background: Grew up playing for fun, went to a bunch of camps, nothing too serious. Took soccer, baseball, snowboarding more seriously. As an “adult”, became daily tennis bum/raging racaholic from 2008-2017. Job promotion/baby/pandemic took me out of the game for a few years, started playing 3-4x a week again last year. I am currently playing in the 4.25 (contains 4.0-4.5 players) section of my local middle aged dad (™) league. I am 45 yo, 5 foot 11 190#.


Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):I have very consistent topspin shots and I generally grind out matches and rely on my athleticism over my tennis IQ, although recently I am experimenting with a more aggressive approach. I have a steady slice, a good but not great 1hbh and a reliable forehand. I have a good serve for my level and I can jam people with pace or slide one out wide. The limiting factors on my game are my quintessential Dad bod and overall absentminded Dadness, it is hard to beat a 4.5 who is 15 years younger than you when you are wondering between points if you need to pick up more Go-Go squeezes. I have seen matches pivot tragically based on whose turn it is to pick up from daycare.

Current shoe: Adidas Barricade size 11, Former Asics Gel Resolution 8 Wide user, had to switch because the inner lockdown laces were crushing my left foot and causing nueroma. Currently loving the lighter faster twitchier, wider (!) feel of the Barricade.

How many hours did you play with the shoe? Approx 25 hours
Normal Size: 11
Playtesting Size: 11

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort: I like the way the shoe fit right out of the box. It did not have quite as wide of a toe splay area as my Barricade, but there was no pinching. The forefoot lacing looks like an homage to the Vapor 9. Unlike other K Swiss shoes I have tried, the cushioning felt ample, not boardy or cheap. Overall the feel is very slipper like, almost a running shoe feel. The shoes feel light on the feet and weigh in about 28g less than a Barricade.

-arch support: I could tell right away that the stock insole was too flimsy for me to actually play tennis in, so I inserted my Superfeet orange. They fit seamlessly into the shoe with no hot spots. I like to have a firm arch support in my shoes. I am a former bartender and I once had a gnarly bout of plantar fasciitis so I always err on the side of a firm arch. The stock insole is your typical generic piece of lightweight foam.

-stability/support: the shoe is fairly stable considering how light, fast and comfortable it is. When I put my insole in, I felt solid and was able to play points comfortably. The issue for me is that the upper is so light and flexible that when my movement became aggressive, I felt like I was maxing the shoe out. For reference I am 5 11, 190#. The upper is just too soft to give you a really locked down protective feel. I like to feel locked in and protected when I am out there moving as fast as I can. It’s kind of like soft snowboard boots vs stiff snowboard boots. Soft is fine for going slow and playing around, but when you start moving fast and running over chunky uneven snow, you will feel more secure, smooth and protected with a stiffer boot. Again, I am a middle aged man playing on hardcourts, its not like I am aggressively sliding into every shot, but I could feel the shoe give slightly in a way I didn’t like when I was stretched deep to a corner and had to squash one back for example. It’s just not the racecar that the Barricade is.

-ventilation: it has been cold in SF this spring. Haven’t really noticed my foot overheating, although I did have a moment last week where I felt the shoe was becoming a little sweat soaked and the response was getting a little spongy. One thing that people might care about is that the sweat from my foot turned the mesh part of the upper into a kind of dingy yellow off white which is not the most attractive look. I don’t really care but this is why I usually buy darker colored shoes. I love a crisp white look in theory but I am too much of a slob to maintain it. Also I believe that white shoes and socks make me look 10 years older. It’s kind of Pete Carroll vibes and I’m not feeling Pete.

-sole durability: Durability seems excellent. Really impressed on this front, I tried to wear these every single time I played for the last month and they are holding up nicely. I will post up a pic. Far superior to Nikes that I have owned and on par with Barricades.

-toe durability: The toe area is well protected and the firm material covers the mesh well up onto the top of the foot. I have played a month in the shoes and see no sign or ripping or seam weakness. All the toe protection is glued/fused and not stitched and its holding strong.

-traction: Here is a little bit where the shoe lets me down. I feel like the rubber has good grip, but the combination of a slightly cushy sole and a soft upper makes the shoe not so trustworthy on slides and sticks. This is where that running shoe comfort is a double edged sword. I can’t really, really trust the response when I am moving at top speed, I feel like I am going to stick or highside a little bit and it makes me nervous. I get that it is a speed shoe and not a support shoe but beware if you are a really aggressive mover. I prefer the Barricade’s very low to the court feel, with the perfect herringbone pattern for aggressive hardcourt response and protection.

-weight: the shoe feels light and my size 11 weighed in at 381g. For comparison the Barricade is at 408 g. Overall the shoe does not fatigue my foot and I felt no soreness after playing. It is a lighter,faster, vaporish feel.

General reaction/comments on overall performance: Overall, I am stoked on the quality and performance of this shoe. For me, however, it does not feel like a “serious” tennis shoe. It is comfortable, well cushioned and good looking, however it lacks the quick twitch response and protective aspects that I would look for in a match day shoe. Because of the excellent cushioning, light weight and above average durability, I think it is a good choice for a mellow tennis player, or a good shoe for certain types of training. If you are very light on your toes, or just prefer a running shoe feel, these might appeal to you. Thabo Sefalosha plays NBA basketball in Nike Air Max 90s, he says it makes him feel fast and free. I’m definitely not that guy, I want the racecar response with locked in support that doesn’t crush my wide forefoot. I have a few blocks a week where I am just grooving my strokes, trying to play groundstroke games to 11 and these fit the bill perfectly for that and leave my feet feeling fresher than the super firm ride of the Barricade. However, if I am in a situation where I am going to be running down every ball, sliding and stretching for balls and pushing off with max effort, I will reach for a more responsive shoe. Obviously there is no holy grail with shoes and you always have to make tradeoffs with comfort, response and support. For me I wish I could take the light feel and comfort of these and marry them to the perfect court feel and slide/stick ratio of the Barricade. But that’s life. I am a Barricade guy until further notice. I do think the all black/off white colorways on these are sick and would consider those for coaching/casual chilling.
 
Tennis experience/background: I was a nationally ranked Jr. I teach 35+ hours on court a week.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I have an all around game. I like to hit every type of shot. I play mostly aggressive but I have good defense. I am an aggressive mover.

Current shoe: Asics Court ff , Nike Vapor Cage 4, Nike GP Turbo

How many hours did you play with the shoe? 30+

Normal Size: 10.5

Playtesting Size: 10.5


-comfort: 4/5 -- I am happy with the comfort. They feel great for coaching. I think they are the right balance of soft and firm.

-arch support: 4/5 -- I had no problems with the arch support. I played them stock and with orthotics. They are definitely better with orthotics but plenty good stock.

-stability/support: 3/5 -- Compared to my other shoes they are not nearly as stable but for a speed shoe I don't have any complaints. My feet feel good wearing these after being on court for as many as 10 hours in a day.

-ventilation: 4.5/5 -- I found them to breath much better then my other shoes. They could be slightly better for the weight class but no complaints. Even in 90 degrees I was happy.

-sole durability: 3.5/5 -- I think they will hold up ok. Not nearly as good as the cage 4s but I don't think any shoe can come close. An aggressive slider will go through them fast.

-toe durability: 5/5 -- I have no wear so far on the toe. They should hold up really well.

-traction: 4/5 -- I was able to move very fast. I was not 100 percent confident with super powerful movements like sliding but overall I am happy.

-weight: 4.5/5 -- Definitely light. I enjoyed the weight and balance of the shoe. Speedy

General reaction/comments on overall performance: 3/5 -- I found these shoes to be very avg. I never felt fully safe to slide or make explosive movements. But at the same time they were still really fast. Very comfortable standing in and overall I like the fit. I personally wouldn't buy these shoes for that price point but I am very happy I got to try them.
 
Top