The most beautiful picture in Tennis history

Standaa

G.O.A.T.
You seem to be quite familiar with the technicalities of Fed’s BH - this one from earlier is interesting don’t you think?

roger-federer-of-switzerland-hits-a-backhand-to-rafael-nadal-of-spain-picture-id524095980



It can’t be a topspin.

But it doesn’t look his usual slice either - the backswing looks more like Graf’s.

8159e76b2e2e74d311073fd492d704af.jpg


What do you think?

Why do you think the shot in the picture can’t be a topspin BH? It looks like a finishing point of the backswing right before he starts to swing forward. If you look at his right arm, it’s flexed. It’s the same as in this video, if you put it at 0.5x speed, you can see the exact same stance at 0:07.

 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
Why do you think the shot in the picture can’t be a topspin BH? It looks like a finishing point of the backswing right before he starts to swing forward. If you look at his right arm, it’s flexed. It’s the same as in this video, if you put it at 0.5x speed, you can see the exact same stance at 0:07.


Sorry, extremely poor phrasing. Blame @Azure for distracting me with moobs.

I meant to ask if you thought it was a top spin. It’s not a high def capture angle we often get to see with the Federer BH.

But you’ve already answered it, including footage. Makes total sense!

Thanks!
 

Azure

G.O.A.T.
Never got the appeal. Her left arm looks weird after the follow-through. I much prefer how Fed keeps his arm straight and lets it go behind his back. I also prefer the way he prepares and the way he keeps the head of his racquet high and upright during his backswing to what Henin does.
Federer's is more lucid for sure but Henin's is more like Wawa's. I always thought Henin opened up and rotated her torso for the shot in the perfect way. Forget the left hand. Look at the arc her backhand makes. It's perfect.
 

Azure

G.O.A.T.
That kinetic chain is a thing of beauty.
One should consider her height too. Federer at around 6'2 is at the perfect height. Henin at 5'6 is not. All the balls to her backhand were well over shoulder height. It was amazing to see her neutralise those vicious balls to her. We know the difficulty Federer has when the same happens to him.
 

Azure

G.O.A.T.
Haven't seen her play live but the BH mechanics remind me vaguely of Gasquet, if we're drawing ATP comparisons.
I have so many taped WTA matches! I miss the competition and variety ttoday. Until 07 was for me the best time to watch women's tennis.

Gasquet's backhand again does not have the sting. It's aesthetically beautiful but not as effective as Fed's or Wawa's
 
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
I have so many taped WTA matches! I miss the competition and variety ttoday. Until 07 was for me the best time to watch women's tennis.

Gasquet's backhand again does not have the sting. It's aesthetically beautiful but not as effective as Fed's or Wawa's
Hmm. Maybe not with enough regularity... and it takes too long to set up... but when he gets in place and times it right, he uncorks massive, massive bombs.

EDIT: Quality here pretty terrible, but check out this one at 0:27.


Same shot, better video quality:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
Are you actually being serious? If so, never debate anything about technique here again as you've just proven how clueless you are.

Fed's backhand here is clearly a pretty standard topspin backhand. The racquet head is already dropping from its original, higher, starting point. He's out wide and got plenty of time so is taking a big wind-up. The fact he's using his topspin backhand grip might have been the most obvious clue here.

Seriously. :cool:
You seem to be quite familiar with the technicalities of Fed’s BH - this one from earlier is interesting don’t you think?

roger-federer-of-switzerland-hits-a-backhand-to-rafael-nadal-of-spain-picture-id524095980




It can’t be a topspin.

But it doesn’t look his usual slice either - the backswing looks more like Graf’s.
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
Are you actually being serious? If so, never debate anything about technique here again as you've just proven how clueless you are.

Fed's backhand here is clearly a pretty standard topspin backhand. The racquet head is already dropping from its original, higher, starting point. He's out wide and got plenty of time so is taking a big wind-up. The fact he's using his topspin backhand grip might have been the most obvious clue here.

Seriously. :cool:

For what it’s worth I agree with you. The grip is a sure tell.

I preferred the way @StANDAA delivered it though.

Why do you think the shot in the picture can’t be a topspin BH? It looks like a finishing point of the backswing right before he starts to swing forward. If you look at his right arm, it’s flexed. It’s the same as in this video, if you put it at 0.5x speed, you can see the exact same stance at 0:07.


Either way, consider me a bit more informed!
 

Azure

G.O.A.T.
Hmm. Maybe not with enough regularity... and it takes too long to set up... but when he gets in place and times it right, he uncorks massive, massive bombs.

EDIT: Quality here pretty terrible, but check out this one at 0:27.


Same shot, better video quality:

This is exactly like suarrez Navarro's. Good one.
 

Standaa

G.O.A.T.
Federer's is more lucid for sure but Henin's is more like Wawa's. I always thought Henin opened up and rotated her torso for the shot in the perfect way. Forget the left hand. Look at the arc her backhand makes. It's perfect.

I honestly can’t see much difference between the way Henin and Fed open up for the shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann

Ann

Hall of Fame
Why do you think the shot in the picture can’t be a topspin BH? It looks like a finishing point of the backswing right before he starts to swing forward. If you look at his right arm, it’s flexed. It’s the same as in this video, if you put it at 0.5x speed, you can see the exact same stance at 0:07.

Beautiful
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
Your agreement isn't necessary. It is so blatantly obvious he is hitting a topspin backhand you literally could have made just as poor an argument that he'd just hit a forehand into the back wall while looking the other way.

This is one of those rare moments on the internet when someone won’t take yes for an answer, isn’t it?

One of the most important things I’ve learned from the internet is that there is no ‘them’ out there. It’s just an awful lot of ‘us’.

Please find a way to work with my agreement of what you wrote, as difficult as this may seem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
holy **** if i tried to do this i'd faceplant on the grass.

It’s often how I feel when I look at these pictures of the pros.

Just once.

Just one time.

Just for one groundstroke I would love to be able to make contact with a ball with that level of commitment.

I want to know what that kind of self confidence feels like on a tennis court.
 
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
It’s often how I feel when I look at these pictures of the pros.

Just once.

Just one time.

Just for one groundstroke I would love to be able to make contact with a ball with that level of commitment.

I want to know what that kind of self confidence feels like on a tennis court.
What happens when you try?
 
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
I am unable to try.

There is always that little kernel of doubt that I can make contact with a ball with absolute and total conviction.
What if you try to do it in increments? [I'm sure a coach has taken a similar approach with you.]

Like what if you can do little things in the process of the groundstroke with absolute mastery (or at least work toward that)?

Maybe it's your footwork/getting into position. Maybe it's watching the ball right into the strings. Maybe it's relaxing your muscles to achieve ultimate fluidity.

And even those can be broken down into component parts.
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
What if you try to do it in increments? [I'm sure a coach has taken a similar approach with you.]

Like what if you can do little things in the process of the groundstroke with absolute mastery (or at least work toward that)?

Maybe it's your footwork/getting into position. Maybe it's watching the ball right into the strings. Maybe it's relaxing your muscles to achieve ultimate fluidity.

And even those can be broken down into component parts.

It’s why I love tennis. You need to problem solve at a wonderfully introspective level.

That’s the thing. As I improve I gain more confidence. With confidence comes conviction.

It’s a journey.

I love the journey.
 

Indigo

Professional
Please guys don't turn this thread into farce. OP didn't say you should make everything a satire and irony.
 
Top