Thoughts on Revolve Spin

[Blitzball]

First Impressions:

I got my new Blade CV 18x20 strung with green Revolve Spin at 52lbs two days ago and have hit with it for close to two hours now. I've used regular Revolve many times, and I'm surprised with how similar Revolve Spin feels to it.

Revolve Spin is slightly less powerful than regular Revolve. Snapback has been almost as good as well, but there is more bite on the ball thanks to the shape of the string. Slightly more control as well, but that's to be expected with the lower power. It feels crisp, but I think the orange and white Revolve string I've used in the past offered a more direct crisp feel whereas this string is more, erm, plush? Not extremely soft feeling, however.

So after 2 hours of testing, Revolve Spin feels and plays exactly how you'd expect: Revolve string that's been shaped to add more spin, which then engages in the typical pros and cons of shaped strings. Mind you, the spin isn't mind-boggling, just slightly better (at least when the strings are fresh). More to come.

 

[scotus]

If you have an extra set, let us know how a hybrid of Revolve Spin mains and Revolve crosses plays.

 

[danbrenner]

This is great stuff as reg Revolve is my fav string of 2016. What sticks out to me is the amazing snapback properties that it has. Please write back in a few days after you have used the string a few times and let us know how it compares to regular evolve. Because regular revolve was great is great so if the shape string Where is out too quick or has a negative property to it please let us now I am excited to use this new string

 

[dimkin]

This is great stuff as reg Revolve is my fav string of 2016. What sticks out to me is the amazing snapback properties that it has. Please write back in a few days after you have used the string a few times and let us know how it compares to regular evolve. Because regular revolve was great is great so if the shape string Where is out too quick or has a negative property to it please let us now I am excited to use this new string

Do you feel the snapback is due to the coating?

 

[danbrenner]

Do you feel the snapback is due to the coating?

Probably but not only I'm sure what's inside it has something to do with it as well either way snapback is something that is a serious thing to consider as most of these shape strings just do not have it

 

[dimkin]

Probably but not only I'm sure what's inside it has something to do with it as well either way snapback is something that is a serious thing to consider as most of these shape strings just do not have it

the reason I was asking as I was trying to figure out if it's due to mains or crosses ... cause if it's due to crosses, hybriding with a shaped string (like Zo Verve or Solstice Power) would be easy

 

[danbrenner]

the reason I was asking as I was trying to figure out if it's due to mains or crosses ... cause if it's due to crosses, hybriding with a shaped string (like Zo Verve or Solstice Power) would be easy

No. That's not it. It has to be able to snap back on itself to be for real

 

[SpinToWin]

the reason I was asking as I was trying to figure out if it's due to mains or crosses ... cause if it's due to crosses, hybriding with a shaped string (like Zo Verve or Solstice Power) would be easy

Both mains and crosses play a role

 

[SCRAP IRON]

the reason I was asking as I was trying to figure out if it's due to mains or crosses ... cause if it's due to crosses, hybriding with a shaped string (like Zo Verve or Solstice Power) would be easy

Gamma Zo Verve is NOT a shaped/edged string. It has a certain texture that allows for more spin than a regular round co-poly. Check out the string again and read about its characteristics.

 

[Zavist]

From Tennis Industry Magazine: " Gamma Zo Verve is a unique co-extrusion polyester string that combines two types of material. At the core is a softer, more elastic, and resilient red polyester. Embedded around the periphery of the red core are three sections (on 120-degree centers) of a stiffer black material that has a higher molecular weight. The black sections stand out slightly from the red core, giving Zo Verve an innate texture in the form of longitudinal ridges".

A quick look at my Gamma catalog shows the drawing of ZV's shape and it is not like their Poly Z or io strings that have the classic round shape. So whether it's called shaped or textured, it's ridges give it more grip than a classic smooth round string.

 

[Matthew Lee]

Where did you get Revolve Spin

 

[Doc Hollidae]

First Impressions:

I got my new Blade CV 18x20 strung with green Revolve Spin at 52lbs two days ago and have hit with it for close to two hours now. I've used regular Revolve many times, and I'm surprised with how similar Revolve Spin feels to it.

Revolve Spin is slightly less powerful than regular Revolve. Snapback has been almost as good as well, but there is more bite on the ball thanks to the shape of the string. Slightly more control as well, but that's to be expected with the lower power. It feels crisp, but I think the orange and white Revolve string I've used in the past offered a more direct crisp feel whereas this string is more, erm, plush? Not extremely soft feeling, however.

So after 2 hours of testing, Revolve Spin feels and plays exactly how you'd expect: Revolve string that's been shaped to add more spin, which then engages in the typical pros and cons of shaped strings. Mind you, the spin isn't mind-boggling, just slightly better (at least when the strings are fresh). More to come.

Can you compare it to Hyper G?

 

[Blitzball]

Where did you get Revolve Spin

I work at a tennis shop and we get all of our racquets through Wilson. We got some Revolve Spin reels a while back.

Can you compare it to Hyper G?

Sorry, I've never used Hyper-G, but I do have an update on the string. After playing another few hours with it, I'm still really enjoying the string. Mind you this is the green colorway. I'm a 4.0 player who hits with good pace, and I'm surprised there isn't more notching so far. I think it's the string's coating that helps retain that snapback quality as with the original Revolve string. Tension maintenance is looking solid. It might feel a tad less, erm, soft? than the original, but otherwise the bite I'm getting is making me a believer.

 

[Babolix]

Who else tested it and could report his sensations about it ? Does the magic lasts longer than with the original Revolve ?

 

[SCRAP IRON]

I played with Revolve Spin two weeks ago, and I must say that I was disappointed. You must realize that I had a very good experience with the original Revolve, so I was expecting good results. What I found is the same crisp comfort but erratic results as well as too much power. I am playing USTA matches so I could not afford to wait and see if the string would settle in and as a result I may get dialed in! Poly in general has a break in period and perhaps pre-stretching would help, although I am reluctant to pre-stretch because I have never tried. I simply went back to a thin gauge of Solinco Revolution which at 50 lbs has always been consistent for me fresh off a new string job. I also found great results and playability with Gamma Zo Verve strung at 46-48 lbs. I have tried at least 20 different polys on the market so I definitely know what I like, but as most of you on this forum I am willing to try new offerings every now and then. I would like to ask if any 4.5-5.0 player has tried Y-Tex Quadro Twist in a full bed and has enjoyed its characteristics. It seems that it would have sufficient snapback because the edges of this square-shaped string are not sharp like Tour Bite or Black Code 4S. Thanks and enjoy your tennis...

 

[Babolix]

I played with Revolve Spin two weeks ago, and I must say that I was disappointed. You must realize that I had a very good experience with the original Revolve, so I was expecting good results. What I found is the same crisp comfort but erratic results as well as too much power. I am playing USTA matches so I could not afford to wait and see if the string would settle in and as a result I may get dialed in! Poly in general has a break in period and perhaps pre-stretching would help, although I am reluctant to pre-stretch because I have never tried. I simply went back to a thin gauge of Solinco Revolution which at 50 lbs has always been consistent for me fresh off a new string job. I also found great results and playability with Gamma Zo Verve strung at 46-48 lbs. I have tried at least 20 different polys on the market so I definitely know what I like, but as most of you on this forum I am willing to try new offerings every now and then. I would like to ask if any 4.5-5.0 player has tried Y-Tex Quadro Twist in a full bed and has enjoyed its characteristics. It seems that it would have sufficient snapback because the edges of this square-shaped string are not sharp like Tour Bite or Black Code 4S. Thanks and enjoy your tennis...

You seem to be a original/regular revolve specialist ! Great, I have some questions !
How long its great playability lasts ? Some say the spin disappear quickly, does it ? Which gauge / colour did you use ? I play long fast strokes on a Ps100 (new) Do you think it's a good set up ? So Revolution is more consistent and has a better duraiblity / long playability ? (If you can say more about Revolution, it would be great !) Have you tried Hyper G ? Could you compare both ?

 

[SCRAP IRON]

You seem to be a original/regular revolve specialist ! Great, I have some questions !
How long its great playability lasts ? Some say the spin disappear quickly, does it ? Which gauge / colour did you use ? I play long fast strokes on a Ps100 (new) Do you think it's a good set up ? So Revolution is more consistent and has a better duraiblity / long playability ? (If you can say more about Revolution, it would be great !) Have you tried Hyper G ? Could you compare both ?

I have not tried Hyper G. As far as Revolution goes, you will enjoy the consistent response and good access to spin from the THINNER gauges- 17 or 18 gauge. They are neither high nor low powered which allows you to take big swings and not fear hitting long or have the ball land at the service line. You should do a side by side comparison with Wilson Revolve. Revolve seems to play better at tensions in the high 40s. My belief is that if you string in the mid 50s you will lose the benefits of these string like good snapback and spin. The Revolve, unlike the Revolution, is NOT a shaped string but it has spin potential similar to shaped/textured strings. It has a little different feel, but it is not harsh. You may find it very comfortable for a poly or you may find that you don't enjoy the plastic like feel. It is a good string however that you can get 8-10 hours of play because it doesn't really notch as do the shaped polys. You may also find that you like the slightly higher launch angle if you hit with decent topspin. Hit for at least a half hour with the Revolve so that they may "settle" and then the consistency will come. I can't comment too much on the durability of these strings because I cut them out after three or four matches. Hopefully this helps a little in your determination.

 

[Babolix]

Ok. So I could try a 17 or 18 Revolution or a Revolve (16L?) @ 48/50lbs ?
8/10 hours, It's a bit short, I would have expect twice that.

I also talk about that on another thread so scuse me for the double : I m looking for a confort/controle and spinny string like the revolve who could last (hopefully) 10/15 hours (could it be more?) with more o less the same playability. My tests brought me to YPTP. Have you tried it ? And which one do you prefer for which reasons ? I fear YPTP to lose tension more quickly no ?

 

[SCRAP IRON]

Ok. So I could try a 17 or 18 Revolution or a Revolve (16L?) @ 48/50lbs ?
8/10 hours, It's a bit short, I would have expect twice that.

I also talk about that on another thread so scuse me for the double : I m looking for a confort/controle and spinny string like the revolve who could last (hopefully) 10/15 hours (could it be more?) with more o less the same playability. My tests brought me to YPTP. Have you tried it ? And which one do you prefer for which reasons ? I fear YPTP to lose tension more quickly no ?

I have tried several Yonex strings, but unfortunately I have not used the original PTP. I will say this, because it is on the softer side of the spectrum, you won't get the playability duration that you would from a stiffer string. That is why I would suggest Gamma Zo Verve. I cut it out of my primary racket so that I may continue to try new strings. I played 12 sets with Gamma Zo Verve and I didn't notice any drop off in play. It is somewhat low powered, which is a plus because it plays well at lower tensions like 46-48 pounds. It feels comfortable and has more than enough spin potential. It is definitely a string that I could consider to be my "go to" string in the future just as soon as I am done sampling a few others like Weiss Cannon Ultra Cable.

 

[Babolix]

I have tried several Yonex strings, but unfortunately I have not used the original PTP. I will say this, because it is on the softer side of the spectrum, you won't get the playability duration that you would from a stiffer string. That is why I would suggest Gamma Zo Verve. I cut it out of my primary racket so that I may continue to try new strings. I played 12 sets with Gamma Zo Verve and I didn't notice any drop off in play. It is somewhat low powered, which is a plus because it plays well at lower tensions like 46-48 pounds. It feels comfortable and has more than enough spin potential. It is definitely a string that I could consider to be my "go to" string in the future just as soon as I am done sampling a few others like Weiss Cannon Ultra Cable.

Ok. As the TW review said PTP has a good playabilty duration (83/100), I thought that, even for a "soft" (not so soft in fact, it feels a little, somewhat, stiff at first) poly, it would go for weeks... I ve some strung now, I will try it soon. Will you try it soon ? Some say it's a bit like revolve, with longer or smaller life...
Ok for Gamma Zo Verve ! I d read good thing about it, but it's really expensive ! Average price for a reel but it's half the length... Could you discribe your feels about it, a bit more ? I'm interested

 

[SpinToWin]

Ok. As the TW review said PTP has a good playabilty duration (83/100), I thought that, even for a "soft" (not so soft in fact, it feels a little, somewhat, stiff at first) poly, it would go for weeks... I ve some strung now, I will try it soon. Will you try it soon ? Some say it's a bit like revolve, with longer or smaller life...
Ok for Gamma Zo Verve ! I d read good thing about it, but it's really expensive ! Average price for a reel but it's half the length... Could you discribe your feels about it, a bit more ? I'm interested

I think that Kirschbaum Pro Line X is an interesting option for a longer lasting string in the same ballpark as those you mention. It produces less spin than Revolve though IMO. The price is a plus though.

 

[Babolix]

I think that Kirschbaum Pro Line X is an interesting option for a longer lasting string in the same ballpark as those you mention. It produces less spin than Revolve though IMO. The price is a plus though.

Ok, I note this one too !

 

[Babolix]

To (try to) sum up what was said in this thread : Revolve spin (some seems to be disappointed, do you have more experiences to share ?), Zo Verve (expansive Do someoneelse tried it ?), Pro line X (less spin but good play duration), PTP (poor playabilty duration), Hyper G (waiting for your feedbacks), Solinco Revolution 18 (some bad points ?) !

 

[Zavist]

Zo Verve is worth every penny because it is spin friendly, consistent and durable. I have hit ZV and Revolve Spin side by side and for me there is no comparison. RS was toasty after 4-5 hours. ZV continues to be playable for me currently beyond 14 hours and counting.

 

[Babolix]

Zo Verve is worth every penny because it is spin friendly, consistent and durable. I have hit ZV and Revolve Spin side by side and for me there is no comparison. RS was toasty after 4-5 hours. ZV continues to be playable for me currently beyond 14 hours and counting.

Sounds like Zo Verve is the answer ! Have to think about it and try !!!
And what do you think of the Pro Line X option ?

 

[Zavist]

Sounds like Zo Verve is the answer ! Have to think about it and try !!!
And what do you think of the Pro Line X option ?

It depends on what you are looking for. PL X was not as spin friendly for me as Revolve or say Big Ace.
The only strings I've been waiting to try are Revolution 18 & WC Ultra Cable. My thoughts are if you are using a power frame, it will be tough to find a string better than ZV.

 

[Babolix]

I use the new babolat PS100. @ firt, I thought to string it with Revolve and then Revolve Spin but he frame came in PTP. I m afraid it dies too soon so I'm looking for some alternative with confort, spin, controle and (the major point) playability duration ! To sum up, an all around string with good tension maintenance / playability duration.

 

[Zavist]

I use the new babolat PS100. @ firt, I thought to string it with Revolve and then Revolve Spin but he frame came in PTP. I m afraid it dies too soon so I'm looking for some alternative with confort, spin, controle and (the major point) playability duration ! To sum up, an all around string with good tension maintenance / playability duration.

I've hit with Revolve a ton in the Blades and Burns. I liked it in those frames. In my PA I found RS too erratic and bouncy for my liking. Based on what you are looking for I'd say try Revolve, Zo Verve 17, Revolution 18, And although discontinued, Pro Supex Big Ace. Zo Verve and Big Ace seem to play much longer than all the others I've tried and have excellent spin potential.

 

[ZirkusAffe]

I think that Kirschbaum Pro Line X is an interesting option for a longer lasting string in the same ballpark as those you mention. It produces less spin than Revolve though IMO. The price is a plus though.

I don't want to highjack or get off main topic, but Pro Line X works best as full poly / hybrid (mains)/ or all the above? Just curious...
I've tried YPTP it was good in one stick and not so awesome in another (both full), then full Solinco Revolution which I loved, currently cyclone 19g.. and Pro Line X is next but I haven't decided if I go full or hybrid or maybe both (any suggestions would be appreciated) ...I should've tried Wilson revolve as well have to add to the string tour. typically it's going into a 16x19 pattern around 50-52lbs but I've tried 48 and 56lb full poly.

 

[warney]

I don't want to highjack or get off main topic, but Pro Line X works best as full poly / hybrid (mains)/ or all the above? Just curious...
I've tried YPTP it was good in one stick and not so awesome in another (both full), then full Solinco Revolution which I loved, currently cyclone 19g.. and Pro Line X is next but I haven't decided if I go full or hybrid or maybe both (any suggestions would be appreciated) ...I should've tried Wilson revolve as well have to add to the string tour. typically it's going into a 16x19 pattern around 50-52lbs but I've tried 48 and 56lb full poly.

I played with PLX full bed for whole year (in EXO3 Rebel 98). It's super durable, but provides very little spin. I found out after I started using shaped strings in the same racquet.
PLX could be great in terms of durability in ESP/spin effect racquets as full bed. PLX could work well in Gut-poly hybrid or shaped poly main hybrid as a cross. For hyrbid setup (POly/poly or Multi main/poly cross), I prefer regular Revolve over PLX as it snaps back better v.s. PLX.

 

[ZirkusAffe]

I played with PLX full bed for whole year (in EXO3 Rebel 98). It's super durable, but provides very little spin. I found out after I started using shaped strings in the same racquet.
PLX could be great in terms of durability in ESP/spin effect racquets as full bed. PLX could work well in Gut-poly hybrid or shaped poly main hybrid as a cross. For hyrbid setup (POly/poly or Multi main/poly cross), I prefer regular Revolve over PLX as it snaps back better v.s. PLX.

thanks for the input, good to know.. I'll probably try it in a hybrid and see how I like it.

 

[SpinToWin]

thanks for the input, good to know.. I'll probably try it in a hybrid and see how I like it.

I'll disagree in regards to the other poster's comments on PL X's spin. I find the string pretty spin friendly, espeicllay for a round poly. There's noticeable ball grab, a higher launch, and (as a result) fairly easy depth. Add a crisp and direct yet comfortable response and you have a great all rounder that lasts.

 

[dimkin]

I am planning to give Zo

I'll disagree in regards to the other poster's comments on PL X's spin. I find the string pretty spin friendly, espeicllay for a round poly. There's noticeable ball grab, a higher launch, and (as a result) fairly easy depth. Add a crisp and direct yet comfortable response and you have a great all rounder that lasts.

PLX vs PLII vs MP?

 

[Babolix]

I am planning to give Zo

Waiting to read your feedback on this one !

 

[fjcamry]

I am planning to give Zo

PLX vs PLII vs MP?

I have plx in youtek speed pro 18x20 in full bed and pl ll in hybrid as the cross with plx in mains (53lbs /54lbs). I think the plx is best as full set up, pl ll in the crosses as hybrid. The pl ll provides better snap back because is most elastic co poly on market according to reviews . Pl x is a good crisp / comfortable co poly as full bed. However I am trying both strings in a syn gut / co poly hybrid where I like syn gut as the mains due to feel ,pace,spin , depth. I'm looking to add the plx and pl ll in the crosses for their directional control . Will post my results in a week or 2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fjcamry]

I'll disagree in regards to the other poster's comments on PL X's spin. I find the string pretty spin friendly, espeicllay for a round poly. There's noticeable ball grab, a higher launch, and (as a result) fairly easy depth. Add a crisp and direct yet comfortable response and you have a great all rounder that lasts.

This has been my experience too with my youtek speed pro 18x20 with plx in full bed @53lbs. I've been playing with this setup for 1.5 yrs. I'm going to stick with the 17l gauge in a hybrid with 17 g syngut mains and co poly crosses . Two things that I'm looking for is : 1. Directional control from the crosses , 2. Better control on backhands when late. ( that include better slices )

And that's the reason why I like syn gut in the mains because I can get more topspin on my serves after feeling more touch and comfort from the syn gut .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[dimkin]

Waiting to read your feedback on this one !

I've used it once, and liked it ...
Was a little turned off by the price

 

[SpinToWin]

PLX vs PLII vs MP?

Well most of the difference between these polys lies in their stiffness IMO. I haven't ever tried PL II 16 in my current frame though, so I can only speak in regards to Pro Line Rough.

Max Power is the stiffest, most rigid string, and therefore you can feel the ball compress more on the stringbed. The feel is the most direct and crisp, yet vibrations are fairly low. For me this string needs a minimum racquet head speed and/or swingweight + twistweight in order to unlock its spin potential, as you need to exert more force on the string to displace it (due to its rigidity). When you take huge cuts at the ball the string can produce some nasty spin, however slower swings tend to be somewhat flatter. The launch angle hence is a function of the swingspeed, though I would say it has one of the flatter launches on slower strokes and a fairly high launch on faster strokes.

PL X to me is best described as a more lively Max Power with a slightly softer, more forgiving feel and more ball grab. Even on slower strokes you can feel the strings grab the ball and launch it high. Of all these strings it has the consistently highest launch IMO. This makes it somewhat easy to place the ball deep, and makes it quite suitable for people who play modern topspin strokes IMO, though it didn't groove with my flatter shots, which tended to sail long. The feel remains direct (good pop off the stringbed), yet more muted than Max Power, which makes the string more comfortable (and forgiving I find). However, good pop off the stringbed along with a somewhat muted feel tends to give me trouble locating the ball.

PL Rough ( = PL II Rough AFAIK) is my favourite of the bunch and noticeably softer than the others. What I love is the string's pocketing, an attribute the others strings lack, as it gives me good feedback on my shot, which inspires confidence on a shot by shot basis. Often times poly strings which pocket the ball well tend to be erratic, but not so here, it remains predictable and controllable, even on very fast swings. The launch is consistently lower, yet the access to spin isn't low, which makes it easy to manipulate the ball I find. The highlight with this string are aggressive drives through the court, which tends to be my preference. The other strings (particularly PL X I think) are more well suited to WW forehands where the spin dips the ball back into the court with a more extreme arch (though Max Power certainly is more versatile than PL X).

Not sure if I've forgotten anything, but I'm writing up full reviews for my playtest thread in the next few days anyways

 

[Babolix]

Interesting ! Thx for this report on Kirschbaum strings.
Which strings do you prefer for your flatter strokes ? does Revolve could suit you ? Maybe less than Rs Lyon ?
Also for this type of game, what do you think of control/textured strings like Solinco Tourbite, Hyper G or maybe Tecnifibre BC 4S ?

 

[ZirkusAffe]

Awesome info on all strings.. going to try PLX full first low 50's in a 16x19.. maybe even in the Vcore 330 with the tighter pattern which I've only gone full poly in and I've liked it always.

 

[SpinToWin]

Interesting ! Thx for this report on Kirschbaum strings.
Which strings do you prefer for your flatter strokes ? does Revolve could suit you ? Maybe less than Rs Lyon ?
Also for this type of game, what do you think of control/textured strings like Solinco Tourbite, Hyper G or maybe Tecnifibre BC 4S ?

Revolve is great for the first few hours for me (2-4 at most)... then it launches the ball.

Haven't tried RS Lyon, but its reportedly poor spin doesn't appeal to me

For a flatter game I will recommend round strings every single time. Shaped polys tend to be too erratic for flat games imo. I've got max power 1.25 in my Dunlop R Sport and that frame is super predictable and accurate on flat strokes.

 

[Babolix]

Revolve is great for the first few hours for me (2-4 at most)... then it launches the ball.

Haven't tried RS Lyon, but its reportedly poor spin doesn't appeal to me

For a flatter game I will recommend round strings every single time. Shaped polys tend to be too erratic for flat games imo. I've got max power 1.25 in my Dunlop R Sport and that frame is super predictable and accurate on flat strokes.

Ok ! I note that too !
So what is your(s) go-to string(s) ?

 

[SpinToWin]

Ok ! I note that too !
So what is your(s) go-to string(s) ?

Switching to Pro Line Rough 16 now. Just ordered a reel

 

[fjcamry]

The plx is available as 17L (1.20mm) just in case you don't know this . I found it on **** and it's coming from Poland. I'm using it in my crosses with the 17g syn gut in the mains . I'm using a youtek speed pro 18x20 57lbs/53lbs after using the plx 16g in a full bed after 2 yrs now, but syn gut for 6 yrs in my Jr and HS tennis days.

Update : just hit serves with the syn gut main and plx crosses . The serves are dipping with a lot of kick and slice from the syn gut mains / sharp with pace and sharp with directional control from the plx crosses . I'm getting no vibration and am not using a vibration dampener . I'm getting a lot of feedback from the syn gut mains plus the higher ball path with sharp angles from the plx crosses. The kick and slice is from the syn gut mains and I'm getting tons of dip like the full bed syn gut .

Update 2:

Just came back from match night . Played 2 sets of doubles 5-7, 6-7 (5-7) over 2.5 hrs long. I had used the 17g syn gut mains with 17L (1.20) plx crosses . I like this set up because of the comfort and finesse of the syn gut but also the crisp and tall ball path of the plx . Plus tons of spin and depth and pace from the predictable plx . This definitely is my setup from here on out. I just keep a hybrid of 17g syn gut mains and pL ll 17g crosses as a backup for its pocketing and a full bed syn gut 17g in a 3rd frame for a reference racquet. These 3 racquets stay in my bag . I have a 4th frame by the stringing machine . These are all youtek speed pro 18x20.

Update 3:

After playing doubles clinic 1.5 hrs today with the pl ll 17g hybrid in crosses I can say that this string has it all . From spin , power, control , comfort , it kept me confident with the pocketing to swing differently depending on the shot and the drives are the shining aspect of the string . It keeps the ball consistently low and in doubles this is a must .

I will try reversing the plx to the mains with the syn gut in the crosses. I think maybe the plx will shine more as the main string

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Babolix]

I was reading some reviews, thoughts, tests...
The theoric result gives Luxilon 4G as better tha Revolve for spin, durability, soft feels, comfort and control ! (Of course, the price is x2)

And, SpinToWin, it seems to be a great option for flat strokes!!!
Who knows 4G and could compare it to Revolve ? Does it deserve the price ?

 

[SpinToWin]

I was reading some reviews, thoughts, tests...
The theoric result gives Luxilon 4G as better tha Revolve for spin, durability, soft feels, comfort and control ! (Of course, the price is x2)

And, SpinToWin, it seems to be a great option for flat strokes!!!
Who knows 4G and could compare it to Revolve ? Does it deserve the price ?

4G sucks IMO.

Really dead, not comfortable, dents quickly and sucks for spin... The only thing it has going for itself is that it doesn't change over time, but it plays like a poly that has gone dead throughout, so why the heck would I pay 20+€ for it.

Less spin than Revolve
Less comfort
Less soft feel
Sort of more control I guess? Unless you like to control your shots with spin, cause this string sucks for that!
More durability.

If durability is all you want you can just put a full bed of kevlar in your racquet though.

 

[Babolix]

4G sucks IMO.

Really dead, not comfortable, dents quickly and sucks for spin... The only thing it has going for itself is that it doesn't change over time, but it plays like a poly that has gone dead throughout, so why the heck would I pay 20+€ for it.

Less spin than Revolve
Less comfort
Less soft feel
Sort of more control I guess? Unless you like to control your shots with spin, cause this string sucks for that!
More durability.

If durability is all you want you can just put a full bed of kevlar in your racquet though.

Oh s**t !!! lol I thought I've found the holy grail !!! With both quality of PTP, Revolve with durability... Me=Sad ! But as it 's so expansive, it's a good news that it's not a great string ! You make me save >20€ for the trial.
Can I bother you with one more question ? (I think I've already a lot of options to follow but it won't be the last one I ask you...Sorry ) So :
Have you tried Head Lynx and what do you think of it ? Compared to PTP and Revolve?

 

[SpinToWin]

Oh s**t !!! lol I thought I've found the holy grail !!! With both quality of PTP, Revolve with durability... Me=Sad ! But as it 's so expansive, it's a good news that it's not a great string ! You make me save >20€ for the trial.
Can I bother you with one more question ? (I think I've already a lot of options to follow but it won't be the last one I ask you...Sorry ) So :
Have you tried Head Lynx and what do you think of it ? Compared to PTP and Revolve?

Lively, spin friendly, crisp connected feel, forgiving… Pretty decent really. Loses its qualities rather fast and becomes unpredictable in my book though. It's a popular string with juniors in Head sponsored clubs around here.

Revolve offers more control and spin. YPTP offers more control, but I'm not sure about the rest of the attributes really.

 

[Babolix]

Ok, it confirm what I read.
For tension maintenance, playability duration and durability, what would you say ? Revolve > PTP > Lynx for you ?
I read the playtest thread about Lynx. Some say the tension is great for hours, weeks, decades (lol, but TW review says the same as you : not so great.
I like those types of strings but as I don't string myself so it could become expansive and so I need to have something that don't move too much for 15/20 hours or at least 10 and stay playable !
I see for some posts already that Revolve could be the answer, but I fear the way it changes along the time. (Break in period then good for 4 hours then tension loss then dry...)

 

[SpinToWin]

Ok, it confirm what I read.
For tension maintenance, playability duration and durability, what would you say ? Revolve > PTP > Lynx for you ?
I read the playtest thread about Lynx. Some say the tension is great for hours, weeks, decades (lol, but TW review says the same as you : not so great.
I like those types of strings but as I don't string myself so it could become expansive and so I need to have something that don't move too much for 15/20 hours or at least 10 and stay playable !
I see for some posts already that Revolve could be the answer, but I fear the way it changes along the time. (Break in period then good for 4 hours then tension loss then dry...)

I'd recommend trying some strings.

Revolve, PTP, and PL II (or Pro Line Rough if you wanna go down my route) are some good options, one of which is sure to suit you.