Top 10 women players of all time at this point- where would you place Serena

[abmk]

I wonder how many majors he may win in 2003 or 2004!!!

he'd get beaten by agassi/nalbandian/roddick/el ayanoui @ AO 2003
he'd get beaten by ferrero/coria/verkerk/gonzales @ FO 2003
he'd get beaten by federer/roddick/phillippoussis/agassi @ wimbledon 2003
he'd get beaten by roddick/nalbandian/ferrero/agassi/hewitt/federer @ USO 2003


he'd get beaten by federer/safin/agassi/ferrero/nalbandian/hewitt @ AO 2004
he'd get beaten by gaudio/coria/nalbandian/kuerten & maybe even henman@ FO 2004
he'd get beaten by federer/roddick/ancic @ wimbledon 2004
he'd get beaten by federer/agassi/hewitt/johansson/roddick/henman @ USO 2004


so yeah, very clear : ZERO majors ...

every one of these majors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in strength than any of the majors than kodes won ....

 

[abmk]

anyways going off track in this thread ... I'm going to stop about that topic in this thread .. maybe in some other thread ....

 

[kiki]

he'd get beaten by agassi/nalbandian/roddick/el ayanoui @ AO 2003
he'd get beaten by ferrero/coria/verkerk/gonzales @ FO 2003
he'd get beaten by federer/roddick/phillippoussis/agassi @ wimbledon 2003
he'd get beaten by roddick/nalbandian/ferrero/agassi/hewitt/federer @ USO 2003


he'd get beaten by federer/safin/agassi/ferrero/nalbandian/hewitt @ AO 2004
he'd get beaten by gaudio/coria/nalbandian/kuerten & maybe even henman@ FO 2004
he'd get beaten by federer/roddick/ancic @ wimbledon 2004
he'd get beaten by federer/agassi/hewitt/johansson/roddick/henman @ USO 2004


so yeah, very clear : ZERO majors ...

every one of these majors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in strength than any of the majors than kodes won ....

I know you enjoy journeyman like Coria, ancicn,nalbandian,johansson,henman...Your post is so laughable.

Kodes won MORE titles than Roddick and Hewitt assembled.Sorry.

 

[kiki]

borg was a full 3 years from his grass court prime(76 onwards) in 73 and connors was yet to hit his peak ( next year ) ... nastase bombed out ...given his inconsistent self, not that surprising ...

70 AO - had ashe,newcombe,okker,ashe,smith
71 AO - had laver,rosewall,ashe,okker,roche,emerson,newk


the other AOs were pretty weak .... its a measure of desperation that you have to compare to that standard to defend wimbledon 73 ... again weakest wimbledon by far in the open era without a shadow of doubt ....

13 out of 16 seeds missing, 81 players missing ...

He reached two USO finals, beating the world´s nº1 player in each.He also beat a Nastase to be world nº 1 in their FO final, back in 71....Kodes was insanely great¡¡¡