Top players need money. This is their livelihood.
But it's fair to cancel an entire season?
Certain people are still discussing this as if it's June of 2019 and we're living in a perfect world, a perfect world where no one should be forced to be the slightest bit uncomfortable or make sacrifices. That's not reality. Sporting events across the globe have and are moving to months and times they normally don't take place in.
The very top players do not actually "need the money," at least not for quite some time. The players hovering outside the top 50 to top 100 or lower absolutely need the money. Of course everyone wants to get back to playing professional tournaments, but I strongly believe that Federer, Nadal, and perhaps quite a few others view the possibility of chaotic, altered tournaments without fans as a big disadvantage to them. Both Fed and Rafa have made comments that suggest as much.
I didn't say the entire season should be cancelled. However, I'm not a big endorser of maneuvering specific key tournaments around just for the sake of playing them. In my opinion, the tennis calendar should not be altered. If a tournament cannot take place in its traditional time slot and venue without major alterations, then it should not be played in 2020.
Yes, I realize the entire world has been thrown off and has been forced to make changes, but tennis is different than the NBA, MLB or European soccer. I believe professional golf has rearranged its schedule to try to play each of its four majors, but even golf isn't a perfect comparison to tennis.
It's a huge deal to suddenly ask players to show up after a six month break and play two grand slams on different continents and different surfaces with virtually no traditional build up tournaments. Perhaps moving the U.S. Open later in the fall and changing the venue to Indian Wells, as one proposal suggested, would make some sense, but again, it would only work if other American hard court events were moved accordingly to lead in to it. Due to climate considerations, that may not be feasible.