Ultimate racquet of choice - tournament players and/or coaches

Wheelz

Hall of Fame
Added weight without changing swingweight still feels like it adds weight behind the shot. I know there's also a trend for low weight and high static, but high static and lower SW also can have weight behind the ball.


TECNIFIBIRE TFight 315 RS 16x19 REVIEW
Millman's endorsed racquet. His personal specs from what I've found around are:
98", 349g, 317mm, 65ra, 334 SW. Amazing specs that even I could handle without preparation.

......

Compared to my TF40 315 16x19 (customized to 324g/30.5/292)
 
Last edited:

Boubi

Professional
Sounds quite nice.

How does it compare to the RS305?

Is it just different string pattern and specs or any other noticable differences?

How open/closed is the string pattern compared to an angell 95 16x19?
I will soon test speed pro/MP and solinco whiteout when it's available in Europe
Are they on your list ?
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Sounds quite nice.

How does it compare to the RS305?

Is it just different string pattern and specs or any other noticable differences?

How open/closed is the string pattern compared to an angell 95 16x19?
Sorry i noticed i skipped part 2 of your question :p angell is the most open pattern frame i played lol. Maybe babolats are same hahahah
 

veelium

Hall of Fame
I will soon test speed pro/MP and solinco whiteout when it's available in Europe
Are they on your list ?
You quoted the wrong guy I guess but he's written a lot about the speed pro earlier in the thread.
Edit: too late, also didn't know a new speed is coming soon
 

veelium

Hall of Fame
Finally got to test out the gravity pro yesterday. Windy conditions, fresh and very soft clay courts and a lower-level hitting partner so just first impressions.

Nice feeling racquet, specwise it came in nicely, 340g strung (including 2 overgrips). No clue about the swingweight yet but feels as or more manouverable as my 350g strung/300 unstrung swingweight tc95.
Came strung with some alu power (like) poly at a tension somewhat too high for me. If you swing hard and fast this is a great racquet for ground strokes, good control, decent spin for an 18x20, similar to an 18x20 blade. Felt like I could really smash forehands and they would still go in, mishit or not thanks to the big sweetspot although that could have been due to the relatively high tension for my standards. Big sweetspot but quite demanding, I'd hit a lot of balls short, might be easier with a lower tension though. Solid for slice, volley etc, not much to say there.

Felt less manouverable on serve and a bit underpowered but hard to judge well with the wind and string setup. But unlikely to turn into my favourite serving racquet.

Conclusion: I think it's too demanding for me on clay if I'd play high level opponents. Even though the sweetspot is huge, the thin beam doesn't make it too stable if you don't swing fast enough.
Great frame overall but I don't think it suits me that much, I'd probably prefer a slighty weighted up Gravity tour.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
TECNIFIBIRE TFight 315 RS 16x19 REVIEW
8c35c16ab861d71e39af02fae0887357

Millman's endorsed racquet. His personal specs from what I've found around are:
98", 349g, 317mm, 65ra, 334 SW. Amazing specs that even I could handle without preparation.
rs315.jpg


How does it play in stock form?

The closest frame I could compare it to would be Head Gravity Tour. At least my idea, expectations towards how Extreme Tour should play is more found in RS 315. What I mean is that the power lvl and forgiveness, stability really suits the description of Head Extreme line while Extreme Tour is in my opinion mislabeled as "extreme" where it should be something like "Prestige S" or "radical something"...

It's ready to play in stock form. Something I really appreciate in retail racquets. Mine came a bit heavier at 318g, 310mm which actually is also great :) First I strung it at 24kg/24kg with Mayami Big Spin as I heard it's a powerful frame and spin oriented so wanted to emphasise spin potential with 3-sided string and keep the power lvl lower by tighter tension..
So - I will repeat - Tecnifibre frames are IMO all starting from control-based idea and then designers tweak it into direction they want to market the frame.
At 24kg the power lvl was too low and frame felt a bit dead. It was ok but nothing stood out. I gave it to the student, he was actually very happy with the frame (he also enjoyed Tecnifibre IGA a lot but wanted something heavier). I revisited the frame after a month and wow. What a change. Tension for sure must have dropped and the frame came to life. It was much closer to the description you can find online. Power, forgiveness, spin. Basicly "Head Extreme" alternative under 98" and foam filled or if you want - it's kinda like a radical with speed combo.

Compared to my TF40 315 16x19 (customized to 324g/30.5/292) RS315 offers more power, similar spin, a bit more forgiveness but I would say the feel of forgiveness comes from the faster response. Millman is stringing his 16x19 TFight with Black Code 1.28 at very high tension so I guess his response is pretty dead :p
The launch angle is still pretty low so I didn't feel the need of putting thicker gauges. I would recommend stringing it lower than 24kg. Mayami Big Spin is rather on a softer side than Black Code so I was quite surprised with the response being so low powered. Let the frame breath and string it low !

If you are concerned about the stiffnes don't be. It feels closer to 65-66 ra frames. Most likely thanks to foam inside. I would still prefer a softer layap but mainly for my performance preferences rather than feel (I like longer dwell time).

Closest alternative:
Head Extreme Tour - RS315 feels less hollow in stock form, and is more stable. However I must give a point to Extreme Tour beam design. It's 22-23-21 but feels and looks actually thinner. I like the idea of it being more suitable to prestige line however it's weird to see it in the Extreme family (if we compare the performances).
RS315 is 23/23/22.5 and feels thicker for sure but maybe thats the reason why it's ready to play in stock form while Extreme Tour is screaming for more mass.
TF40 315 customized has thinner beam, longer dwell time, more control, less power, slightly more forgiveness and for my game I think it might be better but both are amazing. I think RS315 at 65ra (like Millman) would be amazing combo of something "very close" to TF40 315 but with different DNA.
Maybe Wilson Pro Staff actually? But It's been a crazy long time I last played with a Pro Staff family.

Rating: 7.0/10 - please give us version within 63-65 ra for slightly longer dwell time :) I wouldn't mind a slightly heavier SW but it's ok.

say hello (y) @dandan.tennis

rest of the frames
A-awesome review !!! Thanks.
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
Time to continue Speed week ! :)
Let me tell you that Head Graphene 360+ Speed Pro is the best version of this line ever !

I know only 2 players with Speed Pro 18x20. JJ Wolf and Illya Marchenko

ghows-OH-200909277-5bb4a566.jpg

illya-marchenko-of-ukraine-plays-a-forehand-in-his-first-round-match-picture-id1323533344


There is probably more of them outside top 100 who we can probably call "Djokovic effect" :) - very talented juniors who bought Speed just like me in the past and are actually rocking the tour now with the stick they are most used to.

But back to review....

It is the most comfortable speed ever but not noodle. It's very solid and offers lot of feedback given its 23mm thick. Impact is very clean and satisfying.

If I had to use one word for speed pro 360+ it would be - performance. This racquet is loaded with performance. 100" headsize with a more oval shape and 18x20 pattern captures almost all necessary assets for a pro racquet. I know the SW is around 330 but it wasnt too heavy. Faster than blade 18x20 or yonex vcore pro hd 18x20 ... Easy spin, easy acces to power, great on backhand. Well its almost a perfect racquet really !

so what's wrong with it?
I absolutely hate it's thickness and in this case its more the look than anything tennis related. Because If I close my eyes it actually doesn't feel like 23mm racquet. More like 21.5-22mm. But when I look at it I just feel old haha ! Do I need that much help from the racquet ? It feels weird looking at it xd And this can transition to my brain and this to my performance hah! So yes. It's almost a perfect racquet - for a modern player. Old school guys will feel a bit off.

One thing to mention - serves. I unfortunately didn't try serving with it. I heard that the thicker beam is akward on serve motions.

BTW I checked and youtek graphene speed pro (the one i started my journey with) was: 22.5/22.5/21.5

I think I would highly consider this racquet if they made it 22mm straight beam while retaining all the performance they packed in 360+ version. I imagine that 360+ version can be a bit tough for touch shots. It's a bit one trick pony stick with amazing groundstrokes. 22mm could offer more touch and feedback.

rest of the racquets (click)
say hello! (y) @dandan.tennis
Is this the TGT 293.2 Prestige (recent Prestige MP pro stock mold)?
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
I also think it is a good idea to add some more weight to your handle.

Earlier my Elevates also had that similar balance of 32.4cm. Lowering the balance to about 32cm made my serve motion feel more natural. Of course it is just preference and what you're used to.

BTW. Maybe I also should try the Doppio. ;) I only don't like the rectangular grip shape of PK. In the past I replaced my BA98s with Volkl S pallets and that was a hassle.
Doppio?
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
Time for the Head Graphene 360+ MP 18x20 review ! I don't know anyone using this frame (Karatsev is the strongest endorser) BUT I can see some young players in the future popping up with a prostock of this model.

z26783987Q.jpg


I tested every prestige MP from IG version (had even anniversary edition in my hands) so there was IG (innegra), Graphene, Graphene Xt and Graphene Touch. I think i didnt skip any names?

Innegra - great frame, fast but stable enough, suprisingly good spin potential, some users were reporting issues with elbow or wrist (not me)
Graphene - very demanding (they increased SW a lot on this one), the feel was a bit harsher. I know nobody that liked that frame. In fact most users at this point probably switched to Yonex Vcore Duel G which maybe was at that moment the closest thing to IG prestige (but needed more lead)
Graphene XT - kinda hollow feeling, it was a bit like innegra without the feel
Graphene Touch - It was a step into right direction. I know some Head sponsored coaches that were on the edge of switching their brand after 4 horrible years with prestige line (Graphene and Xt). Most were aiming at the Yonex Vcore line but Touch edition managed to keep some of them. In my opinion it was slightly anemic, required low tensions or some mods but the feel in my opinion was already nice. Of course if we compare it to competition frames back then it would fade out. At this point Wilson was already all over the place dominating with Blades. Yonex also took a big share out of Head's Hands (lol) - internet wasn't helping either. Most were still favouring IG line. HUGE problem for Head.

and here we are - 360+ MP. Or should we say Recuperation line?

Yes, this is my favourite edition and I like it even more than the legendary (not anymore!) IG / innegra. First of all in stock form I think the specs are pretty much spot on for me. Maybe I would prefer a slight (but very small) bump in SW but I guess it depends on quality control.

I was holding 6 different Prestige MP 360+ in my hands from different users and in different time. The first one (demo version in a store) felt the best to me. One was slightly too heavy and rest of them were the closest to each other and slightly faster than the demo version. I am very sensitive to specs but I would say the QC on prestige line is good and above average.

Performance - Prestige that is able to take out some Blade users from Wilson camp ? It's much more forgiving and spin friendly than previous versions. It's a frame that can be used by 4.0. Friends coaches noticed slight bump in power and spin (especially serves) with only a small drawback on volleys.

I think this is near perfect frame for somebody that in general prefers lower powered response but quite nice forgiveness and spin potential for 18x20 pattern. So far I was saying that all IG fans should try Dunlop CX200 Tour. Now I say pick 360+ graphene version.

Also right now If I had to change my current racquet of choice (Angell TC95 16x19 with 1.30 gauge strings) I would pick between Head Prestige 360+ MP or Tecnifibre Tfight RS305 and change the gauge to 1.25... maybe Blade V7 18x20 but haven't tried it yet.

What could be improved? That's the BIG question for Head and for the fans. I know many players that already stocked up with that edition in fear that Head will ruin their upcoming release.

I don't know the answer to this question. First because we need to respect the prestige line and the overall DNA of the racquet. It should remain control oriented with great touch and feel. It should still remain maneuverable and let more demanding players mod it a bit (probably leather +tiny amount of lead at 12"). I hope they will not increase the flex in the hoop that kinda shoots off the ball with a slight boost (Yonex Vcore 97 HD has it and its taking away the confidence). They could slightly (JUST SLIGHTLY) push the performance towards Speed Pro. Or just slightly add more plow. I would be surprised if they could manage to create something similar to 360+ but with even more spin potential and same control. That would be crazy good.

Why I haven't switched? First because I already have 3x customized angells. Second, because it's not any better. It's just as good just like Tecnifibre Tfight RS and probably Blade 18x20. BUT the main reason is that I currently play with 16x19 pattern which enables me to play good vs better players (if that makes any sense?). From difficult situations it's easier to hit amazing counter attacks. It's easier to serve a bomb and kick serves. Even if during practice I felt confident with Prestige I am not sure how it could affect my results.

Yes I have Tecnifibre RS305 in my bag (modified) and I do believe that 18x19 is the perfect meet in the middle. Why I haven't switched to RS305 ? Because I would have to modify all the purchased racquets to make it more HL and I am very OCD (I had maybe like 6 angells with very very similar specs but I couldn't compete with some of them because they felt heavier or lighter than my nr. 1) . I have one RS for fun hitting or to restart my brain.

I give it a 7.2 rating. Slightly more plow and spin potential would be appreciated. Otherwise the best Prestige I tested ever.

rest of the racquets (click)
say hello! (y) @dandan.tennis
Have you tried the IG though?
And the Head TGT 293.1 Pro Stock 16x19 ?
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Innegra is the timeline „technology”. So there were IG (innegra) speeds, radicals, prestige, extremes…

i played with IG speed and prestige. Prestige was better and speed was very unstable.
Ig line (innegra) was replaced by graphene line then xt line then touch line to 360 + and now auxetic. 10 years of tennis history :p before IG there was „youtek” something like that also great prestige frames. Before that I was too young to register the lines.
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
Innegra is the timeline „technology”. So there were IG (innegra) speeds, radicals, prestige, extremes…

i played with IG speed and prestige. Prestige was better and speed was very unstable.
Ig line (innegra) was replaced by graphene line then xt line then touch line to 360 + and now auxetic. 10 years of tennis history :p before IG there was „youtek” something like that also great prestige frames. Before that I was too young to register the lines.
Thanks but I am still confused lol It is getting into my HEAD, help! :)

Your Head Graphene 360+ MP 18x20, where do I find it? (BTW your reviews should contain specs imho. I don't even know if it's a 95.)...What's the latest model in that line?
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
Time for the Head Graphene 360+ MP 18x20 review ! I don't know anyone using this frame (Karatsev is the strongest endorser) BUT I can see some young players in the future popping up with a prostock of this model.

z26783987Q.jpg


I tested every prestige MP from IG version (had even anniversary edition in my hands) so there was IG (innegra), Graphene, Graphene Xt and Graphene Touch. I think i didnt skip any names?

Innegra - great frame, fast but stable enough, suprisingly good spin potential, some users were reporting issues with elbow or wrist (not me)
Graphene - very demanding (they increased SW a lot on this one), the feel was a bit harsher. I know nobody that liked that frame. In fact most users at this point probably switched to Yonex Vcore Duel G which maybe was at that moment the closest thing to IG prestige (but needed more lead)
Graphene XT - kinda hollow feeling, it was a bit like innegra without the feel
Graphene Touch - It was a step into right direction. I know some Head sponsored coaches that were on the edge of switching their brand after 4 horrible years with prestige line (Graphene and Xt). Most were aiming at the Yonex Vcore line but Touch edition managed to keep some of them. In my opinion it was slightly anemic, required low tensions or some mods but the feel in my opinion was already nice. Of course if we compare it to competition frames back then it would fade out. At this point Wilson was already all over the place dominating with Blades. Yonex also took a big share out of Head's Hands (lol) - internet wasn't helping either. Most were still favouring IG line. HUGE problem for Head.

and here we are - 360+ MP. Or should we say Recuperation line?

Yes, this is my favourite edition and I like it even more than the legendary (not anymore!) IG / innegra. First of all in stock form I think the specs are pretty much spot on for me. Maybe I would prefer a slight (but very small) bump in SW but I guess it depends on quality control.

I was holding 6 different Prestige MP 360+ in my hands from different users and in different time. The first one (demo version in a store) felt the best to me. One was slightly too heavy and rest of them were the closest to each other and slightly faster than the demo version. I am very sensitive to specs but I would say the QC on prestige line is good and above average.

Performance - Prestige that is able to take out some Blade users from Wilson camp ? It's much more forgiving and spin friendly than previous versions. It's a frame that can be used by 4.0. Friends coaches noticed slight bump in power and spin (especially serves) with only a small drawback on volleys.

I think this is near perfect frame for somebody that in general prefers lower powered response but quite nice forgiveness and spin potential for 18x20 pattern. So far I was saying that all IG fans should try Dunlop CX200 Tour. Now I say pick 360+ graphene version.

Also right now If I had to change my current racquet of choice (Angell TC95 16x19 with 1.30 gauge strings) I would pick between Head Prestige 360+ MP or Tecnifibre Tfight RS305 and change the gauge to 1.25... maybe Blade V7 18x20 but haven't tried it yet.

What could be improved? That's the BIG question for Head and for the fans. I know many players that already stocked up with that edition in fear that Head will ruin their upcoming release.

I don't know the answer to this question. First because we need to respect the prestige line and the overall DNA of the racquet. It should remain control oriented with great touch and feel. It should still remain maneuverable and let more demanding players mod it a bit (probably leather +tiny amount of lead at 12"). I hope they will not increase the flex in the hoop that kinda shoots off the ball with a slight boost (Yonex Vcore 97 HD has it and its taking away the confidence). They could slightly (JUST SLIGHTLY) push the performance towards Speed Pro. Or just slightly add more plow. I would be surprised if they could manage to create something similar to 360+ but with even more spin potential and same control. That would be crazy good.

Why I haven't switched? First because I already have 3x customized angells. Second, because it's not any better. It's just as good just like Tecnifibre Tfight RS and probably Blade 18x20. BUT the main reason is that I currently play with 16x19 pattern which enables me to play good vs better players (if that makes any sense?). From difficult situations it's easier to hit amazing counter attacks. It's easier to serve a bomb and kick serves. Even if during practice I felt confident with Prestige I am not sure how it could affect my results.

Yes I have Tecnifibre RS305 in my bag (modified) and I do believe that 18x19 is the perfect meet in the middle. Why I haven't switched to RS305 ? Because I would have to modify all the purchased racquets to make it more HL and I am very OCD (I had maybe like 6 angells with very very similar specs but I couldn't compete with some of them because they felt heavier or lighter than my nr. 1) . I have one RS for fun hitting or to restart my brain.

I give it a 7.2 rating. Slightly more plow and spin potential would be appreciated. Otherwise the best Prestige I tested ever.

rest of the racquets (click)
say hello! (y) @dandan.tennis
So this is the newer version of the IG Prestige Pro reviewed here: https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/racquet_reviews/HYIGPPreview.html ?
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame

Wheelz

Hall of Fame
I

I havent but i should. There was something that pushed me back but i should for sure. Didnt head drop it in auxecit line ? I know there was in 360+
it’s called the MP now. 18x19 thin beam. I came close to buy blind when the 360+ were heavily discounted somewhere local but picked up a speed pro. I’d be curious to compare.

 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Might have said this before but @galapagos you should check out the Head Auxetic Prestige MP-L. Great for customization, methinks.
oh its definitely on my list. Maybe one of my students will buy it oneday :p I wonder what's the "entry" level of this frame. Kinda like Head Extreme Tour ? Or maybe Speed MP? I'm not sure how should I look at that frame. It's light and has low SW, its 99" but it's a prestige with thin beam so maybe something like "advanced" players looking for more help?
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Angell TC97 16x19 REVIEW

Last Angell in my lineup. TC97 18x20 was kinda cool and I loved tc95 16x19 so why shouldn't I try tc97 16x19 right?

So as expected - it's pretty much same difference as switching from tc95 18x20 to 16x19. So tc97 16x19 is offering me more power than tc97 18x20, more spin and slightly more forgiveness. It's still a power that has to be unlucked but it's there waiting for you to hit clean and then the ball gets that small kick (that I actually don't like).
So TC97 16x19 was the hardest to control for me. Yes, even tc100 was somehow easier. I guess I just got used to the flex of D-beam angells.
Funny enough, if we compare the response between tc95 and tc97 16x19 I would say they like slightly different strings. To my surprise I experienced lower launch angle with 1.25 stiffer string like Mayami Magic Twist (good combo) vs softer 1.30 Signum Pro Firestorm where in tc95 63ra it was the opposite.

More stable and forgiving than tc97 but with less feel and control. There is something cool in tc95 beam shape. It's super slim like a hot model from LA :p Feeling under your hand is so sublime. Argh....It's really hard to find anywhere else.

But of course tc95 has some temper ;p That's where tc97 could be better- more understanding and dialed to your needs in bad days. Are we still discussing racquets?

Overall the added power, thicker beam (at least the feeling of it being thicker) and stiffer feel made me say goodbye to tc97. On top of that I liked tc97 18x20 more than tc97 16x19 and from tc95 I prefer 16x19 to 18x20.... I guess it's up to power/control combination.

I think industry has improved enough to the point where tc97 is a bit out-dated. I would like to see a softer version of TC97. That's also why I prefer K7 Lime. It's pretty much a tc97 2.0 but you can't adjust your specs with the order so you are missing some of the angell experience.

if you want something similar yet different I would suggest Tecnifibre RS315, Yonex Vcore 95, Head Extreme Tour and Tecnifibre TF40 16x19. Out of this 4 I would say Yonex Vcore 95 has that similar "kick boost" when you hit the good spot which I know is kinda addictive. Extreme Tour is the racquet with biggest potential but in stock form it's almost a garbage for advanced players (too empty, anemic, unstable), RS315 is really close in performance to the point where I could say it has similar things to improve (but has much better launch control/tighter spin), TF40 16x19 is much much much more control oriented, kinda prestige frame with 16x19 pattern.
Out of all the racquets mentioned TF40 16x19 315 is my favourite for that ultimate control HOWEVER I admit - it needs some lead as well !

RATING 6.7/10
rest of the frames (click)
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Another practice with RS305 (customized) this time black code strung at lower tension 22/21. Compared to 23 i am getting better spin and feel without adding too much power. Black code really likes lower tensions.
i had exact same setup in TF40 16x19 315 (but customized)

RS305 vs TF40 - more forgiving, more power, more stable but a bit lower launch angle and less spin potential. I am serving better with RS305. I am attacking better with TF40 (more confidence that my acceleration will translate into spin) and defending better with RS305.
Slices are much better with RS305. On neutral groundstrokes its easier to keep the ball deep with RS305.

Both are great. Hard to say which one I like more. Next string: Tecnifibre Razor Code for direct comparison to Black Code. From what i remember i should get even more comfort, more power, more forgiveness. In Iga frame its working amazing actually…


__________________
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:

bertrevert

Legend
RS305 vs TF40 - more forgiving, more power, more stable but a bit lower launch angle and less spin potential. I am serving better with RS305. I am attacking better with TF40

by that reckoning I would suggest yr stats wld be better with the 305, it just would add up, and sounds like that would be the better weapon. (Now I know it's not all stats/winning there is also the sheer enjoyment factor to allow for.)
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
by that reckoning I would suggest yr stats wld be better with the 305, it just would add up, and sounds like that would be the better weapon. (Now I know it's not all stats/winning there is also the sheer enjoyment factor to allow for.)
I actually pick frames mostly for the stats :) I would say TF40 is better vs worse players that want you to dictate the point. As soon as I am pushed back it's easier to come back with RS305. Both have actually great touch


__________________
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:

TimePlease

Semi-Pro
I actually pick frames mostly for the stats :) I would say TF40 is better vs worse players that want you to dictate the point. As soon as I am pushed back it's easier to come back with RS305. Both have actually great touch
I've found exactly the same thing with the TF40 (previous edition). It can be a bit sluggish against good opponents and fast incoming balls, but when you're forced to dictate the point, its stability and reliable precision make it one of the best weapons I have for those situations.
 
RS 305 definitely less power. But I guess it's related to specs and string pattern rather than frame itself. RS305 is slightly softer and more control-oriented (much less "explosive" response). I prefer RS305 but I have to customize it closer to RS315 specs (make it more HL)
are you still getting on with the diadem elevate? or have moved on from it--were there any benefits to it over the rs305 and tf40 ?
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
are you still getting on with the diadem elevate? or have moved on from it--were there any benefits to it over the rs305 and tf40 ?
Moved on to TF40 315 as it was closer to my specs. Less mods needed. Elevate However kicked out prestige from my bag. Currently have 3 frames in a bag angells, TF40 and RS305 :)
Hmmmm benefits. Maybe in stock form Elevate is slightly more „ready” to play where TF40 needs that mass imo. At the end both needed lead for my competitive matches. TF40 offers more spin

________
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:

galapagos

Hall of Fame
It doesn't sound like a Pro Staff, which is a low powered players' racket with a thin 21mm beam
Same weight, same balance, almost same headsize, same swing weight, similar stiffness (66 ra vs 69 ra but foam filled). Thickness might be the deciding factor but I would say target players are similar. In the past there were thinner tfights. They tweak it from time to time.

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
Moved on to TF40 315 as it was closer to my specs. Less mods needed. Elevate However kicked out prestige from my bag. Currently have 3 frames in a bag angells, TF40 and RS305 :)
Hmmmm benefits. Maybe in stock form Elevate is slightly more „ready” to play where TF40 needs that mass imo. At the end both needed lead for my competitive matches. TF40 offers more spin
Interesting combo, have similar options in mine: RS300, Elev305, Tecni LTD (for arm healing) and now finishing with the setup of Bab PS VS 2022, honorable mention TF40 line. Strings are all hybrids as std set up.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Interesting combo, have similar options in mine: RS300, Elev305, Tecni LTD (for arm healing) and now finishing with the setup of Bab PS VS 2022, honorable mention TF40 line. Strings are all hybrids as std set up.
I did try RS300 las weekend. Complete review to come later but to be honest I think most will enjoy IGA more :)
 

kailash

Hall of Fame
Moved on to TF40 315 as it was closer to my specs. Less mods needed. Elevate However kicked out prestige from my bag. Currently have 3 frames in a bag angells, TF40 and RS305 :)
Hmmmm benefits. Maybe in stock form Elevate is slightly more „ready” to play where TF40 needs that mass imo. At the end both needed lead for my competitive matches. TF40 offers more spin

________
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
TF40 315 (16x19) is excellent; early to judge, but right away goes to my all time top 5 list!

Every area is good; control, power, serves and slices. Feel wise, not as good as the Prestiges, VCore Pro 97s or Blades, but good enough and I can live with that. Rarely missed any shots today!
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
TF40 315 (16x19) is excellent; early to judge, but right away goes to my all time top 5 list!

Every area is good; control, power, serves and slices. Feel wise, not as good as the Prestiges, VCore Pro 97s or Blades, but good enough and I can live with that. Rarely missed any shots today!
for me it is better than Vcore Pro 97 and Prestiges (but I had to customize my TF40). Sweet spot is maybe a bit smaller but seems to be very responsive/grabby but at the same time the frame is very low powered so you actually crave that extra response. It's what I wanted to get from Angell TC97 basicly. Faster response but in a very control oriented/low powered way which overall give you the sensation of longer dwell time anyway. It's like whenever I try to hit faster it will translate into spin. Great frame, could have slightly bigger sweet spot but that's the thing with frames like this.
I can't imagine playing with 1.30 gauge in TF40 16x19 (unles a very soft one like firestorm). Better chances with 1.25, maybe even 1.20 and string max 22 kg :p
However I admit that strings I tried so far were on a control oriented side anyway - black code and tour hex. Now I wonder how would Razor Code perform in it.
 

veelium

Hall of Fame
At least try it... you won't regret.
If I find a used one for a decent price I'll get one but tecnifibres are kinda rare here.
Also doing too well with the gravity pro for now, still undefeated with it and won a tournament :)

I'm not so keen on demoing, takes me too long to really judge frame.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
If I find a used one for a decent price I'll get one but tecnifibres are kinda rare here.
Also doing too well with the gravity pro for now, still undefeated with it and won a tournament :)

I'm not so keen on demoing, takes me too long to really judge frame.
your choice is great too. Thats for sure :) I think I will try to hunt down new Princes :p
 

RockWizard

New User
So the reviews here have definitely put the new TF40s on my watch list as I look for a new racquet. Is there any reason to believe that the 305 model with a leather grip would be much different to the stock 315?
 
Top