He has to be using a diff layup right? Why else would he text a black prototype frame?
Not because of that. There could be other reasons why he would use blacked out racket.
With Head, he used 238.3 which was not the layup offered to the public (.1 = MP; .2 = Pro; .3 = Waw).
Did you ever hit with the 238.3? I kind of wondered what the 3 is as I know the .1, .2, .4 and .5. Is it just a variant of the Microgel Prestige?
Warinka's racket is way too heavy for anybody with less than 5.5 rating. so SW of his frame will make you hit late every time.
Better to just buy from TW with stock specs. most amateur's optimal SW is around 320
Fedace, you obviously don't even lift. A 320 SW is nothing.
If I would post pics of Wawrinka's racket (last years), would you be able to know if it is retail or custom? I should be able to take pics in 2 weeks or so!
The reason why I think it's a custom layup is because I saw a listing for his racquet and it was blacked out. I'm thinking he was using a blacked put frame to test diff layups like rf. If he was using a retail, there would be No need to paint the frame black.
NadalGirl is reacting so that he or She won't be discovered. I thought Nadalgirl liked singles. very Clever,, Very Clever
I think I know which listing are you talking about...Listing you saw was for 97tour vcore blacked out supposedly wawrinkas I spoke with the owner and he is basically not even sure and cannot confirm it's his...
...basically whom ever sold him the racquet told him that it was wawrinka test racquet never used in match...also specs were way off from last known Stan specs which can happen when changing frames but unlikely IMHO...
In match play Stan is using 95d mold 100%
If I would post pics of Wawrinka's racket (last years), would you be able to know if it is retail or custom? I should be able to take pics in 2 weeks or so!
I think I know which listing are you talking about...Listing you saw was for 97tour vcore blacked out supposedly wawrinkas I spoke with the owner and he is basically not even sure and cannot confirm it's his...
...basically whom ever sold him the racquet told him that it was wawrinka test racquet never used in match...also specs were way off from last known Stan specs which can happen when changing frames but unlikely IMHO...
In match play Stan is using 95d mold 100%
And yes I think that is the same listing, however, he has been spotted using a blacked out yonex for a while. So my idea is he was testing out a layup.
The mold is a 95d forsure
right we don't even really know what he has. All these guys that say he has 95d are speaking from 2nd hand information source. They have never really seen or touched or examined his racket 1st hand......LOL
Please do. It will help.
He wraps the overgrip pretty close which adds thickness.
Here we go - some pics of Stan's racket (2013).
The only other Yonex I had that I could compare it to was a RD-8, which is marked as a 95 head size, so Stan's clearly looks smaller than that.
Let me know if you want pics of something specific.
The racket weighs 372g on my kitchen scale. More pics here: https://plus.google.com/photos/111778561398581771386/albums/6006965116448929905?authkey=CIv2kprN2eSkTw
Yep thats a lot of overlap and with a second OG to flare up butt. Yonex, please do something to the shape of the butt.
It's crazy, I had to resort using Wilson buttcaps to replace the Yonex ones.
Since when has he used a second OG? I'm pretty sure that P1 just puts a piece of thin-width medical tape around the buttcap to make it more pronounced.
it may just be me, but does the top of the head of Stan's racquet look slightly more rectangular than that of the 95D? :-?
That's according to frinton's post above...
That mark doesn't necessarily mean that he's using an overgrip though. I've gotten marks on my grips like that and I only use one overgrip.
I am just basing on what he has said, after all he's the one with the racquet.
And it does look like it.
Well, I do not have any other idea why that mark should be there, but the 2nd over grip was just my best guess. Any other explanation might be as valid.
Frinton, it sure looks like a 95D. Could you measure the beam width? An accurate measurement could all but confirm that it's a 95D mold.
The mystery remains, though - why discontinue a stick that was very popular and still used by YY's top player? The only thing I can think of is that the 95D, which seemed to hurt a lot of elbows in stock form, needs to be weighted up to truly arm safe.