So don’t get me wrong - there’s no way a guy who was a match away from CYGS is going quietly into the night. I personally think he’ll be in a position to win multiple Slams in the next few years and agree with your post for the most part. And at age 35, nothing is guaranteed.
just talking on a high level which is why I quoted this part of your post: what if we wake up in 2024 and Djokovic is on 20 Slams? That’ll mean that, barring injury (which would be noble and not his fault) or god forbid missing Slams due to vaccines (which he likely won’t but LOL) the arguable GOAT of the sport will have spent his twilight years as a whipping boy to Sascha Zverev, Daniil Medvedev or even worse someone like Sinner or Tsitsipas. luckily for him and his fans, 21 Slams looks like a near certainty now. But getting locked out of Club 21 by Medvedev and Zverev? Think about that. How embarrassing. Losing a few to them will happen, it’s reality. But never winning another Slam would be a travesty.
Hard to make a GOAT case if he never wins another Slam, in that context. And yes I know old age gets everyone, but it would be absolutely embarrassing if Medvedev/Zverev/Tsitsipas keep him completely locked out from winning Slams. They aren’t mugs but come on, they aren’t exactly world beaters or ATGs, and in my eyes Novak is a significantly better player. I think he needs a slam at age 35/36 to have a real case. Roger got his.