Crocodile
G.O.A.T.
Every now and again when I do some racquet testing I usually end up buying some racquets and keeping them so I can make comparisons on certain metrics that I want to research.
Sometimes I may even buy an old new stock racquet that I really like and add them to a collection.
However at some stage in my collecting I start to think that it’s dead money sitting in the cupboard or better frames are out there and so I sell them off like a purge to get some cash and perhaps either buy a newer frame or divert the funds to other projects.
A year later I can sometimes realise that I shouldn’t have sold some of the frames I because they have either become very rare to find in the condition I had them for, or they were very unique or realise they were really good racquets or beautifully designed or painted frames.
Problem arises when you realise that you can’t take them with you to the next world and other family members wouldn’t appreciate them anyway so you ponder why you even collect. I know people who have bought every version of an RF including the Laver Cup versions or every colour way of a Volkl
C 10 or Rossignol F200. Some actively search out for every version of a 1980’s Hi Ten Snauwert or Dunlop 200g. Even if a $200 frame doubled in value it’s not going to make a huge difference to your finances unless you have many to sell and you probably could have put your money into something better. Still we engage in this activity because we like racquets and tennis. There is also this movement towards minimalism where you try to live light so if you decide to move it’s a lot easier. I thought maybe I could limit myself to a set number and not exceed that limit.
Anyone have any thoughts about this ?
Sometimes I may even buy an old new stock racquet that I really like and add them to a collection.
However at some stage in my collecting I start to think that it’s dead money sitting in the cupboard or better frames are out there and so I sell them off like a purge to get some cash and perhaps either buy a newer frame or divert the funds to other projects.
A year later I can sometimes realise that I shouldn’t have sold some of the frames I because they have either become very rare to find in the condition I had them for, or they were very unique or realise they were really good racquets or beautifully designed or painted frames.
Problem arises when you realise that you can’t take them with you to the next world and other family members wouldn’t appreciate them anyway so you ponder why you even collect. I know people who have bought every version of an RF including the Laver Cup versions or every colour way of a Volkl
C 10 or Rossignol F200. Some actively search out for every version of a 1980’s Hi Ten Snauwert or Dunlop 200g. Even if a $200 frame doubled in value it’s not going to make a huge difference to your finances unless you have many to sell and you probably could have put your money into something better. Still we engage in this activity because we like racquets and tennis. There is also this movement towards minimalism where you try to live light so if you decide to move it’s a lot easier. I thought maybe I could limit myself to a set number and not exceed that limit.
Anyone have any thoughts about this ?