Monfed with his usual Nadal jinxing crap. Fed does have a chance at Wimby. You're just being ridiculous.
he does come out with some crap true. But when reading it, think of how your "nadal won't make it past the quarters of any clay event and has no chance of winning Barca" stuff this year sounded just as ridiculous. Yes it did. You sounded as ridiculous as monfed.
:lol:
You also know Nadal isn't a mug and is one of the most talented players ever.Nadal is a mug and Fed isn't so I don't think it's ridiculous to say he won't win anything. Fed does have 17 slams and counting you know.
Plus Monfed only does it in a pitiful attempt at jinxing Nadal, who needs no help from him in being pathetic. He doesn't really believe any of the stuff he posts.
You also know Nadal isn't a mug and is one of the most talented players ever.
So a mug can win 11 slams and over 20 Masters?That's your opinion.
So a mug can win 11 slams and over 20 Masters?
Off clay Federer has beaten Djokovic two of the three times they've played this year. Including clay it's 3-2 to Djokovic.. Federer had a pretty lacklustre clay season this year - possibly a half-arsed effort to put more into Wimbledon and the short turnaround for the Olympics.Not that optimistic in honesty.
Federer might have a chance to pick up maybe one slam next year.
Federer cant seem to beat novak or nadal without completely outplaying them, which happens pretty rarely these days.
Cheezz, are we still talking about the same Fed who just made the WTF final barely a month ago? And who gave a good beating of Murray who was supposed to have his breakthrough year by a score of 6-2 in the 2nd set? How can you and other people see such a DRASTIC decline both physically and mentally from Fed in 2013 compared to 2012? Even on FO, probably his worst surface, he made SF in 2012, and lost to Djoker, very likely due to his previous long QF against DelPo. His new schedule was also lighter, so it's not like he's killing himself playing every single Master out there. IMO, Djoker represents the biggest thread to Fed. Murray, DelPo,Tsonga, and Berdieman (in that order) are in the second group who can give Fed some run for his money ONLY under the condition that they're ON and Fed is OFF on that given day. I have to wait to see Rafa before making any judgement. Either he's between Djoker and the 2nd group I mentioned, or below the 2nd group, based on how fast he gets back in his match-ready shape.I think after every year he will lose more and more consistency. He will still be incredibly consistent, but not enough to actually win the slams anymore. Perhaps he will post SF round results for the US Open and the AO, but I can't see that for Wimbledon or the FO.
You never cease to amaze me with your predictions!!!It's not looking good for Federer. If Nadal can tie Sampras this year, Nadal will have 14 (or 15) slams at the age of 27. And then Nadal can win Roland Garros for the next five years AT LEAST, taking him to 19-20 slams. All Federer will be able to do is try to retain his QF streak. Looks like a Santoro-like end for Federer... (although Santoro was more skilled than Federer)
Ask Nadal. Lol. Seriously, he wasn't always a mug, but he has definitely become one over the past few years.
Federer will still make deep runs in the slams, perhaps winning them (something could happen again in 2014?) but his overall consistency is starting to fade, just at a slow rate. It will come to a point where he loses in the QF stage of majors. At all of them. Might not be next year, but it's coming. Still, that's an impressive feat as nobody else, to my knowledge would have achieved that or been a lock for the QF round (at least) for years.Cheezz, are we still talking about the same Fed who just made the WTF final barely a month ago? And who gave a good beating of Murray who was supposed to have his breakthrough year by a score of 6-2 in the 2nd set? How can you and other people see such a DRASTIC decline both physically and mentally from Fed in 2013 compared to 2012? Even on FO, probably his worst surface, he made SF in 2012, and lost to Djoker, very likely due to his previous long QF against DelPo. His new schedule was also lighter, so it's not like he's killing himself playing every single Master out there. IMO, Djoker represents the biggest thread to Fed. Murray, DelPo,Tsonga, and Berdieman (in that order) are in the second group who can give Fed some run for his money ONLY under the condition that they're ON and Fed is OFF on that given day. I have to wait to see Rafa before making any judgement. Either he's between Djoker and the 2nd group I mentioned, or below the 2nd group, based on how fast he gets back in his match-ready shape.
To me, Fed will SF in every GS. Getting through and winning the final, that's another matter. All depends on how exhausting his SF win, his serve, the identity of his opponent, etc.
(although Santoro was more skilled than Federer)