SaritaUTHorns said:If we're including women here too then I'd say Kim Clijsters.
Oh yes, I forgot about Mauresmo. I agree with you. Clijsters and Mauresmo.Datacipher said:Yes, for current women Mauresmo probably deserves a mention as well.
SaritaUTHorns said:If we're including women here too then I'd say Kim Clijsters.
what does that mean?driger said:pete sampras. he won many slam events, but never a grand slam.
mishadude said:It means he never won all four slams in the same calendar year, ie. what is referred to as the "grand slam".
pound cat said:driger, I htink 95% of the people on this board use the term Grand Slam to mean 1 Slam event, which I assume is the meaning used by the originator of this thread because he said Henman, and others who said Fernandez, Mauresmo, Pioline, Philipousis, Coria none of whom could have won a GRAND SLAM (4 in a year)
He would have won the in 96 but the streaker disturbed all focus on the match.rhubarb said:Mecir, Corretja, possibly Henman.
You must be jesting with Washington. What else did he do apart from Wimbledon 96 final?
SMASHER said:MaliVai Washington. He could never get overthat hump. Knee surgery did not help either. Plus, he was in the generation with Sampras, Agassi, and Courier.