i know that Wimbledon is changing and that they are slowing down the grass (which is entirly stupid, i mean, why change the surface just becausr the style of the game is changing? I mean, then it would force people to come in and the slam would be harder to win, makes guys like borg winning it from the baseline an achivement, rather then nowadays)
Not that federer sucks for not going in, he does, and it normally works. He has an all-court game.
but why change the properties of this grandslam to beneift baseline rallies? It used to be a S&V surface and it should because in order to win, you should be AT LEAST volley somewhat decent. now, you could get away with not doing that by just standing at the baseline and that defeats the purpose of going in at all.
as for Nadal, his high top spin game just doesnt come across to be as a "Winning Grass Game".
Isnt the best game for playing on grass:
- Big serve
- Good Volleys
- Slicing the ball by keeping it low
- Hitting alot of drop shots
- Good movement
Now movement isnt as big of a problem for most players who havent played on the surface people like it is on clay. But Big servers and Good Volleyers can take advantage of the baseliners alot more because of how much behind the baseline that they are.
Nadal is a legit good player, dont get me wrong, what he has done in the past 2 years is what most guys want in a career, but i dont feel he has the game enough to do well at wimbledon.
But what i can say thats positive is, He simpily wants too.
He wants to win wimbledon more then anything and that desire is rare from a guy from spain, and i feel he might go all the way ONE DAY, once he learns how to use the grass to his advantage, bulk up his serve and volley better, then he will have a shot, but for now, he is just trying to find his way on the grass for the time being.