Well I mean the pool is small here.
Cedric Pioline, Todd Martin, Miroslav Mecir, Kevin Anderson, Robin Soderling, Steve Denton
I might be missing one.
And yes, the question might as well be if Kevin Anderson is the worst 2-time finalist.
And Corretja. Tony Roche made 3 finals in the open era without winning one, though he won one in the amateur era.Forgot about Mark Philippoussis.
Yes, I was about to add Corretja and I think that's about it as far as the OE is concerned.And Corretja. Tony Roche made 3 finals in the open era without winning one, though he won one in the amateur era.
But Denton is the worst. No titles, CH #12 and those finals were in the MM AO.
Funny to have discussions like this. It’s sort of like arguing who is weakest person to bench press 500lbs.Denton seems like the clear "winner" here.
SchuetlerWorse player to make 1 final? Berdych? Phillippoussis? Baghdatis? González? Puerta?
Martin VerkerkWorse player to make 1 final? Berdych? Phillippoussis? Baghdatis? González? Puerta?
Mecir is the best, Soderling a close second.Well I mean the pool is small here.
Cedric Pioline, Todd Martin, Miroslav Mecir, Kevin Anderson, Robin Soderling, Steve Denton
I might be missing one.
And yes, the question might as well be if Kevin Anderson is the worst 2-time finalist.
Mark made two slam finals... Lost a US Open final to Rafter.Worse player to make 1 final? Berdych? Phillippoussis? Baghdatis? González? Puerta?
as surprising as it may sound, it's not kevin anderson !
steve denton didn't even win a single title...
Remove FedrStronk era
Mecir is the best, Soderling a close second.
Steve Denton is the worst easily since he never won a title. Ever.
Kevn Andr is way better than him.
Worse player to make 1 final? Berdych? Phillippoussis? Baghdatis? González? Puerta?
Worse player to make 1 final? Berdych? Phillippoussis? Baghdatis? González? Puerta?
Forgot about him. Yes corretja was better than SoderlingI'll put my plug in for Corretja being the best or at least close to Mecir.
Juan GisbertJohn Marks.
aha KAndyman for sure, although Todd Martin might be there are well
Pioline was unlucky to meet Sampras on both occasions (Wimby and USO) he was a fantastic player on his day
Tood Martin? Martin was actually a very good player but had some bad luck with quite a few injuries in his career.
Pioline and Anderson are pretty much on par as far as I'm concerned. Yes Pioline could be great, but frankly so can Anderson and I rank Anderson opponents at least as high as Pioline's. AFTer this Wimbledon Anderson has gained a lot of respect from me for how he beta Federer and Isner. Despite those tough matches he still could've (actually should've) won the 3rd set against DJokovic in the final.
Soderling more or less on par with philipoussis, although the latter at least made 2 finals on different surfaces.
Denton takes it for worst of the bunch.
So basically for me the ranking would be:
Corretja~Mecir
Martin~Soderling~Philipoussis
Pioline~Anderson
Denton
Not sure about Curren, I never saw him play. Based on his achievements I suppose he should be just above Denton, but maybe he was much better than his achievements tell us.
Tood Martin? Martin was actually a very good player but had some bad luck with quite a few injuries in his career.
Pioline and Anderson are pretty much on par as far as I'm concerned. Yes Pioline could be great, but frankly so can Anderson and I rank Anderson opponents at least as high as Pioline's. AFTer this Wimbledon Anderson has gained a lot of respect from me for how he beta Federer and Isner. Despite those tough matches he still could've (actually should've) won the 3rd set against DJokovic in the final.
Soderling more or less on par with philipoussis, although the latter at least made 2 finals on different surfaces.
Denton takes it for worst of the bunch.
So basically for me the ranking would be:
Corretja~Mecir
Martin~Soderling~Philipoussis
Pioline~Anderson
Denton
Not sure about Curren, I never saw him play. Based on his achievements I suppose he should be just above Denton, but maybe he was much better than his achievements tell us.
Forgot about him. Yes corretja was better than Soderling
LOL Pioline and Anderson on par and Corretja = Mecir
proof you don’t know a thing about tennis - why do you bother posting on a tennis forum then??
Soderling wayyyyy better than the clay specialist
plus Sod has the distinction of beating Nadal at the FO. That match he played was unreal. I think he would have beaten anyone that day.Soderling had one more title off of clay than Corretja, with Corretja winning WTF (beating Sampras in the SF), Indian Wells, D.C. (beating Agassi in the final), and Indianapolis (beating Agassi in the final).
LOL Pioline and Anderson on par and Corretja = Mecir
proof you don’t know a thing about tennis - why do you bother posting on a tennis forum then??
Without clay Soderling would have no claim to fame.Soderling wayyyyy better than the clay specialist