tennisplaya
Rookie
Nadal switch draws?? my opinon he has an easy draw
He already got a bye into the second round
really, when did that happen? did his first round opponent already withdraw?
Nadal switch draws?? my opinon he has an easy draw
He already got a bye into the second round
Nadal switch draws?? my opinon he has an easy draw
He already got a bye into the second round
yeah he did for some strange reason probably fearreally, when did that happen? did his first round opponent already withdraw?
yup, recommending racquets and strings to other posters who want help is really insulting:shock:
42 out of 53
You forgot to add 43 out of 56!
1727 of 1727
1727 useless posts, almost enough for a book of useless information
yeah he did for some strange reason probably fear
To answer your original question, yes, Federer has the easier quarter. But, the quarterfinals of an entire draw is not as important as what happens in the semifinals and finals.
The fact that Federer will have to play Djokovic, or somebody who BEAT Djokovic in the semifinals(assuming he makes it), makes the draw as a whole more difficult than Nadal's.
I fail to see how you "owned" vtmike.
ownership= because the NO answers(like mine) reflect people's perception of Nadal's comfort with ANY draw. They do not reflect an easy of draw as the poll intended.Hope its clear for you now.
Anyways, 1/4 final draw is important too.They don't all just get a free pass to the semis. Federer would be ecstatic not to have Wawrinka in his 1/4 for example, as Wawrinka beat him well on the same type of REAL clay recently.I'm certain Federer would not swap his 1/4 for anyones. If you dont get past your 1/4, the semi draw is irrelevant.
I agree with that part. I agree that no matter who is in his draw, Nadal is going to make it into the final.
To the second part, I know that the QF means something, but it is not as important as the SF or F. The farther it gets into a tournament, the quality of players increase. In the SF and F, where the top 4 players of the tournament are shown--Federer has it worse. That is why I believe Nadal wouldn't switch his draw. Because even if there isn't a big chance, going against Djokovic before the finals isn't preferable.
Nole better not let everyone down by losing before the semis
Not for long. Djokovic will be number 2 after Wimbledon imo.
Not really. Djokovic has a lot of points to gain in Wimbledon and Fed has a lot of points to defend. Also I expect Djokovic to be in the finals of RG and not Fed. Lots of stuff happening in the next 6 weeks.I don't think so. I think it is more wishful thinking on your part than anything else.
Simple question to all those who say that Nadal has a tougher draw than Federer...
Would Nadal trade his draw with Federer?
If your answer is YES :-? Then please explain
If your answer is NO, then just stop with all the "conspiracy against Nadal" crap!
Don't want an answer which goes something like "Umm player X would want to trade places with Fed for the 1st round, trade places with Murray for second round, with Djokovic for third round, then Nadal again for QF etc...."
Just a simple YES or NO...
Not really. Djokovic has a lot of points to gain in Wimbledon and Fed has a lot of points to defend. Also I expect Djokovic to be in the finals of RG and not Fed. Lots of stuff happening in the next 6 weeks.
I don't think so. I think it is more wishful thinking on your part than anything else.
i notice lots of people talking about *quarters*, lots of talk about federer and nadal, and very few people answering the question.
there are two players who have the confidence, and have shown the skill, to take down nadal on clay. they're long shots, but they're the only two you'd even consider betting on doing it. they're federer and djokovic. nadal is apart from federer because of seeding, and djokovic because of the draw. any amount of second tier fodder (and i'm sorry, but when you're talking nadal on clay, that's all ferrer, wawrinka etc are to him) would gladly be taken over the possibility of playing djokovic for 5 hours in the semi-final.
so, to answer the OP's QUESTION, which is being avoided in discussion, it's clear that nadal will be, not relieved (he is heavy favourite in any clay match he plays, he fears no one), but pleased, to have avoided djokovic. 5 hours of djokovic could have killed him for the final. as i said above, he is one of two players who have any legitimate shot at winning a match against nadal on clay.
Not for long. Djokovic will be number 2 after Wimbledon imo.
Finally someone with some sense. Djokovic can gain points in RG and Wimbledon. We'll see if it's enough.No, he's not saying that. Djokovic has no points to defend. If he reaches the semis, which is quite probable, he may gain enough points to become number 2. Of course this may be impossible if Federer wins Wimbledon.
Let's just wait and see.
Finally someone with some sense. Djokovic can gain points in RG and Wimbledon. We'll see if it's enough.
Djokovic reached the RG semis last year. Sure, he can beat that this time by reaching the final, but let's be honest, the chances for him to win it are slim, and that's assuming he passes Federer in the semis.
As for Wimbly, true, he does have many points to win, but he can also lose points before Wimbly (he needs to reach the Halle final to make up for the Queens points he'll lose). Djokovic is yet to prove himself as a great grass player, so far his results do not fit his ranking.
After Wimbly - Djokovic will lose the points of the Olympics (way more than Federer), plus he has to defend semis at Canada and Cincy, while Federer basically has no points at all to defend at Canada and Cincy, as he lost 2nd/3rd round at each event.
I just doubt Djokovic can keep his current form until the end of the season, based on what we've seen in 2007, 2008.
Djokovic reached the RG semis last year. Sure, he can beat that this time by reaching the final, but let's be honest, the chances for him to win it are slim, and that's assuming he passes Federer in the semis.
As for Wimbly, true, he does have many points to win, but he can also lose points before Wimbly (he needs to reach the Halle final to make up for the Queens points he'll lose). Djokovic is yet to prove himself as a great grass player, so far his results do not fit his ranking.
After Wimbly - Djokovic will lose the points of the Olympics (way more than Federer), plus he has to defend semis at Canada and Cincy, while Federer basically has no points at all to defend at Canada and Cincy, as he lost 2nd/3rd round at each event.
I just doubt Djokovic can keep his current form until the end of the season, based on what we've seen in 2007, 2008.
Darn vt, can we use maybe?
It would be a good idea to swap because he wouldn't have that many claycourters in his half. That would guarantee him being fresh for the semis. And if he had an easy time of it he would have enough reserves to get past Djokovic.
So, if I can only answer yes or no. My answer is yes.
That's a good sensible post...I don't agree with it but I like the way you put your point across without any flaming & insults...refreshing change...
^^^ I feel sorry for you...
so you concede that Federer wouldn't swap his cakewalk draw? I see.
Do I think would swap his draw with Nadal? Yes he would! He has Djokovic in his half...why won't he?
Do I think would swap his draw with Nadal? Yes he would! He has Djokovic in his half...why won't he?
So can federer at RG and wimbledon if he wins at eitherFinally someone with some sense. Djokovic can gain points in RG and Wimbledon. We'll see if it's enough.
He will be number 1 if he does because he then holds 3 of 4 slams including his US open title which he still is defending points from last year. If he were to just win Wimbledon or RG then he would be a couple points behind because of the master shields nadal has collected this seasonJust a question...IF Federer does happen to win both the French and Wimbledon beating Nadal in the finals in both of them...will he get really close to Nadal at #1?
I agree with 2, 4, 5, and 6. 1 was a wild prediction, 3 was up for 30 seconds before it got corrected, and 7 I had some fun with in that thread. lol
After thinking carefully about it, I'm gonna say yes. Federer's quarter is the biggest joke I've ever seen. The only difficulty in Fed's draw is Djoko. That's only one player. Now Djoko's quarter is much harder than Fed's, which means there is a chance that Djoko would either get upset before the semi or make the semi after tough matches, so not fresh. I'm gonna add to that the fact that I found Murray impressive vs Chela and having a weak quarter, in form Murray is practically guaranteed to make the semi and my final decision is yes, Nadal would be extremely lucky to have Fed's draw.Dancing around the question will not help...Just answer yes or no...I noticed you haven't voted yet...
^^^ Alright fair enough...Even though I don't agree with your reasoning, I respect your opinion...
I'm pretty sure Djokovic will get to the Semis so I say no.