tennisislife4622
Rookie
I as wellI also had a pea sized fleck of paint come off the throat at some point. It was the only second day i used it.
I as wellI also had a pea sized fleck of paint come off the throat at some point. It was the only second day i used it.
The whole point of a heavy frame is to finish points earlier. If you just play super flicky tennis with it, you're right, the advantage has been lost.Sort of, but if you're like me and sometimes play 2 or 3, 3 set singles tournament matches in one day against high school or early 20's "kids" in tournaments, in 100 degree plus Texas weather, a heavy racket can feel very um, heavy when serving for the 5th hour of the day of tennis playing.
Well, ok, if you are playing an equally matched, advanced, opponent or multiple, in singles, in one day, please give me some details how a 12 ish plus racket guarantees the points will be over more quickly that you won't get tired of lugging that stick around for, say, 4-5 hours of singles. Do you promise it will equal swift victories lol?The whole point of a heavy frame is to finish points earlier. If you just play super flicky tennis with it, you're right, the advantage has been lost.
This is the worst troll bot response I've ever seen on these threads. Honestly, something needs to intervene here.Well, ok, if you are playing an equally matched, advanced, opponent or multiple, in singles, in one day, please give me some details how a 12 ish plus racket guarantees the points will be over more quickly that you won't get tired of lugging that stick around for, say, 4-5 hours of singles. Do you promise it will equal swift victories lol?
I'm serious, you are saying a heavy racket means quicker points because a lighter racket means you have to flick shots back and the points are longer? Without taking into account level, style of play, any variables? You are promising that if someone has a heavier racket the points will be over more quickly, well, with wins I suppose too. I'm not trolling, but if you are playing 4.5 singles and up, and your opponents are equal level, I don't think the tactic to preserve energy and win more quickly is to grab a heavier (12.5 oz and above per say) stick, not for everyone and if it helps a certain type of player, will it make a match be over, say , 30 minutes faster, an hour, 2 hours more quickly? If so, teach me, I want that!This is the worst troll bot response I've ever seen on these threads. Honestly, something needs to intervene here.
This is the worst troll bot response I've ever seen on these threads. Honestly, something needs to intervene here. Not responsive to the current situation!
OK HAL 9000, this conversation can have no legitimate purpose!I'm serious, you are saying a heavy racket means quicker points because a lighter racket means you have to flick shots back and the points are longer? Without taking into account level, style of play, any variables? You are promising that if someone has a heavier racket the points will be over more quickly, well, with wins I suppose too. I'm not trolling, but if you are playing 4.5 singles and up, and your opponents are equal level, I don't think the tactic to preserve energy and win more quickly is to grab a heavier (12.5 oz and above per say) stick, not for everyone and if it helps a certain type of player, will it make a match be over, say , 30 minutes faster, an hour, 2 hours more quickly? If so, teach me, I want that!
Not even, if I see your disgusting talk on here again, will crush you. That's a promise!All right, back to the Tour talk then
The whole point of a heavy frame is to finish points earlier. If you just play super flicky tennis with it, you're right, the advantage has been lost.
Ok, now I think I am being "trolled" or fooled maybe, lol, I did take the bait though, good one.Not even, if I see your disgusting talk on here again, will crush you. That's a promise!
Well, ok, if you are playing an equally matched, advanced, opponent or multiple, in singles, in one day, please give me some details how a 12 ish plus racket guarantees the points will be over more quickly that you won't get tired of lugging that stick around for, say, 4-5 hours of singles. Do you promise it will equal swift victories lol?
Other than being wrong, surereally dude. i mean... nothing wrong with fuzzys opinion.
So, I've played, like I said, with heavy sticks, Pro Staff RF, Vcore 330, great for a doubles match, but for my serve, to really bring it in singles after about 5 hours of singles in 100 plus degree weather it just gets too heavy. The concept is that a heavy stick like those would make the points finish faster, well I serve and volley anyway, is .5 or .6 ounces going to reduce the time of winning points or the amount of strokes needed to win a point to such a degree that I'm going to notice this change? No way, I don't think there is any player out there that would have a switch from a 11.5-11.9 ounce to a 12.5 plus ounce racket and have that make a significant difference in length of matches when they are playing an evenly matched opponent. But, I do get the general concept of heavier balls, heavier rackets, etc.No racket guarantee's anything, it's up to the player. Generally speaking heavier rackets hit a heavier ball, what's hard to understand about that concept? If you're a defensive player who likes longer rallies then go with a lighter racket, if you're an offensive player who likes to keep points short go a bit on the heavier side.
So, I've played, like I said, with heavy sticks, Pro Staff RF, Vcore 330, great for a doubles match, but for my serve, to really bring it in singles after about 5 hours of singles in 100 plus degree weather it just gets too heavy. The concept is that a heavy stick like those would make the points finish faster, well I serve and volley anyway, is .5 or .6 ounces going to reduce the time of winning points or the amount of strokes needed to win a point to such a degree that I'm going to notice this change? No way, I don't think there is any player out there that would have a switch from a 11.5-11.9 ounce to a 12.5 plus ounce racket and have that make a significant difference in length of matches when they are playing an evenly matched opponent. But, I do get the general concept of heavier balls, heavier rackets, etc.
You'd be surprised if I said the Tour seems heavier to me than the 330 and RF seem because they are both head light enough to trick me. I play decently with the Ezone Tour but am selling mine right now (look for it and bid on it if you like), mainly just because I don't like the balance.Heavier racket will equal faster serves which means more aces/unreturnable serves (shorter points) assuming you can swing it, but in your case it tires you out so there's no advantage for you.
But RF 97 and Vcore 330 are much heavier rackets than the Ezone Tour, In my opinion no adult male 20-35 years old should feel a 330 gram racket is too heavy, IMO, but I guess that depends on technique. If you don't have efficient strokes you'll find these rackets heavy I suppose.
Btw why are you playing 5 hours of singles in 100 degree weather? Sounds crazy to me. Anyone would be tired after 5 hours of singles, but you don't choose your racket based on that.
Respectivefully disagree. I hit with the Vcore 330 and like grinding out 3 hour matches at 4.5. I like the heavy racquets because they give me better control, and I can swing out without fear of overhitting like I do with a stiffer, lighter racquet. And You can still serve big with something like the 305 gram pure strike- don’t need a heavy racquet for that.No racket guarantee's anything, it's up to the player. Generally speaking heavier rackets hit a heavier ball, what's hard to understand about that concept? If you're a defensive player who likes longer rallies then go with a lighter racket, if you're an offensive player who likes to keep points short go a bit on the heavier side.
I also had a pea sized fleck of paint come off the throat at some point. It was the only second day i used it.
Any idea why so many paint issues? I don't have these issues on the DR or the 2018 ezone. Is this a common problem with the 2020 Ezone line?I as well
Respectivefully disagree. I hit with the Vcore 330 and like grinding out 3 hour matches at 4.5. I like the heavy racquets because they give me better control, and I can swing out without fear of overhitting like I do with a stiffer, lighter racquet. And You can still serve big with something like the 305 gram pure strike- don’t need a heavy racquet for that.
My 4 DRs and my V Core Pro paint jobs are very high quality. Hope it’s not a new trend with their QC.Any idea why so many paint issues? I don't have these issues on the DR or the 2018 ezone. Is this a common problem with the 2020 Ezone line?
You'd be surprised if I said the Tour seems heavier to me than the 330 and RF seem because they are both head light enough to trick me. I play decently with the Ezone Tour but am selling mine right now (look for it and bid on it if you like), mainly just because I don't like the balance.
Well, I grew up playing in 100 degree weather so it isn't too bad really and it's the only way I can challenge myself physically with long extreme exercise, I don't have whatever it takes mentally and probably physically to run a marathon or do long distance cycling etc., so tennis is how I can push myself further and I don't even mind it that much. I'm actually choosing my racket based on this though, whatever small advantages I lose with the weight when playing doubles or just 1 match a day I can make up for that, I don't think I'm going to lose a match based on having only an 11.5 ouncer etc. etc.
Respectivefully disagree. I hit with the Vcore 330 and like grinding out 3 hour matches at 4.5. I like the heavy racquets because they give me better control, and I can swing out without fear of overhitting like I do with a stiffer, lighter racquet. And You can still serve big with something like the 305 gram pure strike- don’t need a heavy racquet for that.
Yes, forgot to mention me even older Yonex's like the VCORE tour 89, etc....My 4 DRs and my V Core Pro paint jobs are very high quality. Hope it’s not a new trend with their QC.
I believe your results, but it's strange, how did I get lucky, I've bought and sold a Vcore HD, Ezone 98+, Vcore 330, and an Ezone Tour 98 this year without any paint issues. Maybe I was lucky or you were unlucky, who knows?Yes, forgot to mention me even older Yonex's like the VCORE tour 89, etc....
Paint quality is superb on my 20 ezones.My 4 DRs and my V Core Pro paint jobs are very high quality. Hope it’s not a new trend with their QC.
Have a Osaka LE Ezone 98 coming for the wife, we will see how that paint is i guess?I believe your results, but it's strange, how did I get lucky, I've bought and sold a Vcore HD, Ezone 98+, Vcore 330, and an Ezone Tour 98 this year without any paint issues. Maybe I was lucky or you were unlucky, who knows?
My 4 DRs and my V Core Pro paint jobs are very high quality. Hope it’s not a new trend with their QC.
There no damage to graphite. it looks good. it took off the paint so it might acutally make the racket more head light now. use lead to cover up that areaI mean this is what I ended up doing
The top mark is literally where the red of our hardcourts has scraped into the PJ.
Have nothing even remotely similar on my Radicals which have seen far more use...
I got two of each. Both held up great.Hmmm, very high quality? What DR 98 color scheme you refer to - blue or lime green? Surface layer paint on the blue version chips way too easily, on the slightest hit. Even removing a head guard tape can chip the paint, it’s that bad.
I have a dr 98+ and maybe they fixed the quality but i have no chips....just a few scrapes where i am guessing my stringer slid it across something as they cannot be from playing as they are in the throat.Hmmm, very high quality? What DR 98 color scheme you refer to - blue or lime green? Surface layer paint on the blue version chips way too easily, on the slightest hit. Even removing a head guard tape can chip the paint, it’s that bad.
A local teaching pro in our area switched to the VCORE 98 over the winter. He taught outdoors all summer long, lots of long hours in the sun, and the paint on his racquet has disintegrated. The whole racquet basically flaked and peeled down to the red base coat. It looks like it has some sort of skin disease. So clearly Yonex has some work to do on their paint process. the VCore paint seems similar for the EZones, just different colors.
The only problem is NOWHERE HAS ANY DEMOS. TW, mid west, TE, none have any ezones. Sigh
The beam shape on this a basically a hexagon in the throat.Is someone able to compare this to the APD? I’ve tried various iterations of the APD/pure aero and the one thing that kept on coming up as an issue was the beam shape. Didn’t like it at all. Is the beam shape on this similar?
Ah cheers. Sounds pretty similar with that aerodynamic philosophy. May not be for me then with me eastern gripThe beam shape on this a basically a hexagon in the throat.
I think it could work. It wasn’t for me but I did like it okay. The muted feel is what I didn’t like. While the beam is a hexagon shape, it’s thinner in the throat than an APD. The beam on the Ezone does get noticeably thicker in the hoop. The string pattern on this is relatively dense and may work for you if you hit flatter.Ah cheers. Sounds pretty similar with that aerodynamic philosophy. May not be for me then with me eastern grip
I generally like to place a lot of lead and a heavy replacement grip(shock shield)on my racquets, do you think I should do the tour or standard ezone? I think the tour maybe, cause I can handle the extra sw, but the standard because it’s lighter in stock. Thoughts?That might be a clue to as how good it is! I had the Ezone 98 and just went ahead and pulled the trigger on the Tour. I have two Ezone Tours now!
I watched that earlier.
One of my pet peeves that he did in this video, and a lot of others do, is around 7m10, where he goes: "...at around 4pts HL balance, it's definitely a head heavy racket"...
Strung Weight: | 332g / 11,7oz |
Unstrung Weight: | 315g / 11,1oz |
Balance: | 32,99cm / 4 pts HL |
Unstrung Balance: | 32cm / 7 pts HL |
Swingweight: | 330 |
Stiffness: | 62 |
Strung Weight: | 320g / 11,3oz |
Unstrung Weight: | 305g/10,8oz |
Balance: | 32,39cm / 6 pts HL |
Unstrung Balance: | 31,5cm/9 pts HL |
Swingweight: | 317 |
Stiffness: | 64 |
Well tbh it's his perspective and compared to all the racquets in that range (heavy racquets), it's on the head heavy side.