No issues whatsoever, I was actually very pleasantly surprised.
I've had TC100 sticks in the past that felt like they needed more mass in the business end for volleying, so I recently started using a TC100 RA63 in the 4 points headlight 300 gram (unstrung) configuration, very pleased with it thus far, playing more doubles than singles lately and it volleys very well, and my fellow players tell me my serve has regained some pop they hadn't seen in a while from me. Had been using somewhat heavier setups recently but had trouble finding a racquet with enough head mass but that also allowed good racquet speed on serve, this one combines those virtues.
Its perfect for volleying and i honestly don’t think I have played a better volleying stick. I can volley from anywhere on the court and my sensation on both depth and direction feels somehow just right. Off your shoe lace, half volleys or ripping top spins are all very dialed in with this frame.
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?
I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?
I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut
How's the power?
And in the past, 17 gauge polys give me an unpredictable response and high launch angle. I really like the control of 16.
I haven't used the TC97 but Im pretty sure the IGMP just doesnt have the same spin potential as a TC97 16x19 I also used the YTPrestige Pro for windy days and would have used it all the time but it just was a bit stiff for my taste. TC95 solved that... I just love how heavy even a simple rally ball can be.@Backhanded Compliment. As I read in another thread that you are a former user of the Prestige Youtek IG MP, how would you compare to the Angell TC97 16x19 which is my current racquet? Others who have experience of both feel free to chip in too.
Yes I am getting tired of low power in my frames. Not just my Angells, but all. Recently strung my Dark Drive with full Hawk and it's low powered...even for a Dark Drive. So I'm expanding my horizons and trying to add power without sacrificing durability and control. I am okay with losing spin. I hit too spinny with shaped polys anyways.
RS Lyon at 57/57lbs (26/26Kg) in the TC95 16x19. Plenty of power and spin.Open question to everybody: strings and tension of your Angell?
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?
I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut
Useful thing for regulating launch angle is tension. Tried stringing crosses tighter than mains? It provides a lower launch angle, at the cost of some spin. If you usually string mains tighter even tension on mains and crosses does some job too. And if you like ample power, keep the mains tension low. Say, 21/22 kg. As for string, I like SPPP (Poly Plasma). Gives a bit higher power than a usual modern poly with some great playability.
I'll check it out. Thanks. Is that your starting tension or your actual court tension?
I'm more a control player than a power player, so I typically put a string bed in the middle ground of power and control. Currently I use even tension on both mains and crosses on most setups. I use round profile strings except when on 18x20 mains, on which even the roughest triangle shaped polys play with good predictability. Tension depends on a setup and it's specs, currently using 21/21 kg on Head 18x20 MP's, 25/25 kg on 16x15 PS95s, and in between tensions for 16x19 MP's. As for crosses tighter than mains, I used to do this when using a shaped poly on mains on a 16x19 racquet. It helped control a lot, you can significantly lower the launch angle down. Usually 1 kg tighter on crosses should do the trick, though few times I've used 2 kg tighter crosses when using shaped poly mains.
Yes but is that your stringing tension or your actual on-court tension? Is that what you're setting the machine at, or what you let it settle to?
@Backhanded Compliment. As I read in another thread that you are a former user of the Prestige Youtek IG MP, how would you compare to the Angell TC97 16x19 which is my current racquet? Others who have experience of both feel free to chip in too.
Tried full bed origin ? I have used it as a cross with poly mains and it plays very powerful..... You could even try hyper G m origin X
try weisscannon scorpionOkay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?
I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut
What string pattern? Multis didn't work for me in open pure aero. Frayed and notched very fast.
Prestige MP is much lower in power and much lower in spin. Its directional and depth control is about the same as TC97. The only place it is better are touch shots.
Prestige Pro -- is an entirely different matter. It is slightly above TC97 in power, much higher in manoeuvrability, and much easier to generate spin with. Easier to change directions, and easier at the net.
Because of speed, it also produces much better serves for me: more variety and speed.
I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...Can anyone compare TC95 18x20 with Prince Textreme Tour 100P?
Thanks a lot.I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...
Very different frames, not an easy comparison
TC95 better on serves, more plowthrough, more spin (not much more)
Forgiveness, sweetspot, baseline power, turning defense to offense, all that the prince works better.
But the plowthrough... And prince sure makes you sweat less, because of the lower swingweight...
If I was to go tc95 again, I would go 16x19...
If I was to do a more direct comparison, I think maybe tc97 18x20 would feel more like txt 100p...
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...
Very different frames, not an easy comparison
TC95 better on serves, more plowthrough, more spin (not much more)
Forgiveness, sweetspot, baseline power, turning defense to offense, all that the prince works better.
But the plowthrough... And prince sure makes you sweat less, because of the lower swingweight...
If I was to go tc95 again, I would go 16x19...
If I was to do a more direct comparison, I think maybe tc97 18x20 would feel more like txt 100p...
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Whats the average TC95 63RA (16x19) unstrung SW?
Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
Hard to say what the average is but mine is 302 and 303Whats the average TC95 63RA (16x19) unstrung SW?
Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
Do you use lead? Whats your strung sw?Hard to say what the average is but mine is 302 and 303
Whats the average TC95 63RA (16x19) unstrung SW?
Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
If you buy 2 rackets at the same time, they will have the same swingweights or it is random?I have/had one with rare unstrung SW291, and then four SW300 and one SW304.
Mid or MP?Just finished leading my TC90 up and now it feels like home. At 14 ounces this thing rivals the feel of a Prestige Classic 600 or a Pro Staff 85.
I used 12 Sampras power-strips at 3 and 9 (1.5 oz.) and counter-balanced with 0.3 oz. of lead in the handle as well as a Wilson leather grip and two Pro Overgrips.
Compared to a classic...
The SW on mines where 297 unstrung.Whats the average TC95 63RA (16x19) unstrung SW?
Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
I have asked Paul for the same SW, the delivery will take a bit longer as he waits for the right ones to pick from the batches to match.If you buy 2 rackets at the same time, they will have the same swingweights or it is random?
If you buy 2 rackets at the same time, they will have the same swingweights or it is random?
Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X mediante Tapatalk
Very small amount of lead 3&9 so strung SW ~ 333 and i string 1.25mm poly with a #33 rubber band for dampenerDo you use lead? Whats your strung sw?
Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
Again, I can’t tell you an average. I asked for my SW so able to get close to my targets. Managed to get TC100 63RA with SW just under 305. I think you’d be hard pressed to get SW for either TC100/TC95 under 295. I think lowish SW is around what I got.What about the SW of TC100 63 RA?
Again, I can’t tell you an average. I asked for my SW so able to get close to my targets. Managed to get TC100 63RA with SW just under 305. I think you’d be hard pressed to get SW for either TC100/TC95 under 295. I think lowish SW is around what I got.
Can only say about 70RA TC100 - mine is 285 sw. I asked to pick lower sw frame.
Mid or MP?
I was talking about the Head. Just picked up the MP version. I also have an Angell TC97.
That's the IG Prestige Mid, one of the best feeling frames I've ever used. I had it weighted to 13.2 oz. and it did everything well. So I think the Midplus version would be great especially when customized to your spec. But I've never actually used one.
Again, can't speak of averages just I got what I asked for SW wise in both TC95 and 100. My TC95s are 302, 303 and my 100 also 303. Any of the 70RA will generally be lower in SW then the 63RA framesSo, par with TC95 63 RA? I expected a bit lower average SW because of a bigger head size...yet if it's about there no complaint as it's expected that a 100'' will have some more power, being more a tweener type racquet.
So logically just like on TC95, stiffer option has a lower average SW too...
Again, can't speak of averages just I got what I asked for SW wise in both TC95 and 100. My TC95s are 302, 303 and my 100 also 303. Any of the 70RA will generally be lower in SW then the 63RA frames