The Official Angell Users Club

zalive

Hall of Fame
No issues whatsoever, I was actually very pleasantly surprised.

I've had TC100 sticks in the past that felt like they needed more mass in the business end for volleying, so I recently started using a TC100 RA63 in the 4 points headlight 300 gram (unstrung) configuration, very pleased with it thus far, playing more doubles than singles lately and it volleys very well, and my fellow players tell me my serve has regained some pop they hadn't seen in a while from me. Had been using somewhat heavier setups recently but had trouble finding a racquet with enough head mass but that also allowed good racquet speed on serve, this one combines those virtues.

Its perfect for volleying and i honestly don’t think I have played a better volleying stick. I can volley from anywhere on the court and my sensation on both depth and direction feels somehow just right. Off your shoe lace, half volleys or ripping top spins are all very dialed in with this frame.

Thanks guys. This all sounds really good, better than I expected.
 

zalive

Hall of Fame
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?

I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut

Useful thing for regulating launch angle is tension. Tried stringing crosses tighter than mains? It provides a lower launch angle, at the cost of some spin. If you usually string mains tighter even tension on mains and crosses does some job too. And if you like ample power, keep the mains tension low. Say, 21/22 kg. As for string, I like SPPP (Poly Plasma). Gives a bit higher power than a usual modern poly with some great playability.
 

SpinToWin

Talk Tennis Guru
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?

I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut

How's the power?

And in the past, 17 gauge polys give me an unpredictable response and high launch angle. I really like the control of 16.

How about giving Signum Pro Firestorm a try?
 
@Backhanded Compliment. As I read in another thread that you are a former user of the Prestige Youtek IG MP, how would you compare to the Angell TC97 16x19 which is my current racquet? Others who have experience of both feel free to chip in too.
I haven't used the TC97 but Im pretty sure the IGMP just doesnt have the same spin potential as a TC97 16x19 I also used the YTPrestige Pro for windy days and would have used it all the time but it just was a bit stiff for my taste. TC95 solved that... I just love how heavy even a simple rally ball can be.

Yes I am getting tired of low power in my frames. Not just my Angells, but all. Recently strung my Dark Drive with full Hawk and it's low powered...even for a Dark Drive. So I'm expanding my horizons and trying to add power without sacrificing durability and control. I am okay with losing spin. I hit too spinny with shaped polys anyways.

Something like yonex poly tour pro will have a little more power than RSlyon. In fact I really loved YPTP crossed with scorpion on my old Pacific frame. Your cross will effect power a bit if you want to get more lively a response.
 

Aiquc

New User
SW strung on TC95 16x19 63ra 27in long?
SW change with different weight/balance set ups?
Paul answer directly this type of questions on Instagram/Twitter/Facebook?

Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X mediante Tapatalk
 

DJ-

Hall of Fame
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?

I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut

Tried full bed origin ? I have used it as a cross with poly mains and it plays very powerful..... You could even try hyper G m origin X
 

beltsman

G.O.A.T.
Useful thing for regulating launch angle is tension. Tried stringing crosses tighter than mains? It provides a lower launch angle, at the cost of some spin. If you usually string mains tighter even tension on mains and crosses does some job too. And if you like ample power, keep the mains tension low. Say, 21/22 kg. As for string, I like SPPP (Poly Plasma). Gives a bit higher power than a usual modern poly with some great playability.

I'll check it out. Thanks. Is that your starting tension or your actual court tension?
 

zalive

Hall of Fame
I'll check it out. Thanks. Is that your starting tension or your actual court tension?

I'm more a control player than a power player, so I typically put a string bed in the middle ground of power and control. Currently I use even tension on both mains and crosses on most setups. I use round profile strings except when on 18x20 mains, on which even the roughest triangle shaped polys play with good predictability. Tension depends on a setup and it's specs, currently using 21/21 kg on Head 18x20 MP's, 25/25 kg on 16x15 PS95s, and in between tensions for 16x19 MP's. As for crosses tighter than mains, I used to do this when using a shaped poly on mains on a 16x19 racquet. It helped control a lot, you can significantly lower the launch angle down. Usually 1 kg tighter on crosses should do the trick, though few times I've used 2 kg tighter crosses when using shaped poly mains.
 

beltsman

G.O.A.T.
I'm more a control player than a power player, so I typically put a string bed in the middle ground of power and control. Currently I use even tension on both mains and crosses on most setups. I use round profile strings except when on 18x20 mains, on which even the roughest triangle shaped polys play with good predictability. Tension depends on a setup and it's specs, currently using 21/21 kg on Head 18x20 MP's, 25/25 kg on 16x15 PS95s, and in between tensions for 16x19 MP's. As for crosses tighter than mains, I used to do this when using a shaped poly on mains on a 16x19 racquet. It helped control a lot, you can significantly lower the launch angle down. Usually 1 kg tighter on crosses should do the trick, though few times I've used 2 kg tighter crosses when using shaped poly mains.

Yes but is that your stringing tension or your actual on-court tension? Is that what you're setting the machine at, or what you let it settle to?
 

zalive

Hall of Fame
Yes but is that your stringing tension or your actual on-court tension? Is that what you're setting the machine at, or what you let it settle to?

Oh, it's stringing tension. IDK other details, I don't string myself, I guess it's just a regular stringing on a big Babolat machine... :)
 

Tennisist

Professional
@Backhanded Compliment. As I read in another thread that you are a former user of the Prestige Youtek IG MP, how would you compare to the Angell TC97 16x19 which is my current racquet? Others who have experience of both feel free to chip in too.

Prestige MP is much lower in power and much lower in spin. Its directional and depth control is about the same as TC97. The only place it is better are touch shots.
Prestige Pro -- is an entirely different matter. It is slightly above TC97 in power, much higher in manoeuvrability, and much easier to generate spin with. Easier to change directions, and easier at the net.
Because of speed, it also produces much better serves for me: more variety and speed.
 

saleem

Semi-Pro
Okay give it to me straight: what's the best string job for the TC100? Or the TC95?

I need:
- ample power. More than usual full poly bed.
- good around 50 lbs. I don't like spongy.
- not spongy!
- not shaped!
- consistent launch angle (and not extremely high)
- more spin than full sun gut
try weisscannon scorpion
 
Random leftover pics...

highres_269077262.jpeg


highres_268757603.jpeg
 

smirker

Hall of Fame
Prestige MP is much lower in power and much lower in spin. Its directional and depth control is about the same as TC97. The only place it is better are touch shots.
Prestige Pro -- is an entirely different matter. It is slightly above TC97 in power, much higher in manoeuvrability, and much easier to generate spin with. Easier to change directions, and easier at the net.
Because of speed, it also produces much better serves for me: more variety and speed.

Ok, thanks (I think!) maybe I should have gone with the pro but I do prefer an 18x20. Mainly play doubles so touch, feel and volleys are more important attributes in a racket than power.
 

stocchero

New User
Can anyone compare TC95 18x20 with Prince Textreme Tour 100P?
I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...

Very different frames, not an easy comparison

TC95 better on serves, more plowthrough, more spin (not much more)

Forgiveness, sweetspot, baseline power, turning defense to offense, all that the prince works better.

But the plowthrough... And prince sure makes you sweat less, because of the lower swingweight...

If I was to go tc95 again, I would go 16x19...

If I was to do a more direct comparison, I think maybe tc97 18x20 would feel more like txt 100p...

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

hklbkup

Rookie
I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...

Very different frames, not an easy comparison

TC95 better on serves, more plowthrough, more spin (not much more)

Forgiveness, sweetspot, baseline power, turning defense to offense, all that the prince works better.

But the plowthrough... And prince sure makes you sweat less, because of the lower swingweight...

If I was to go tc95 again, I would go 16x19...

If I was to do a more direct comparison, I think maybe tc97 18x20 would feel more like txt 100p...

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Thanks a lot.
 
Just finished leading my TC90 up and now it feels like home. At 14 ounces this thing rivals the feel of a Prestige Classic 600 or a Pro Staff 85.

I used 12 Sampras power-strips at 3 and 9 (1.5 oz.) and counter-balanced with 0.3 oz. of lead in the handle as well as a Wilson leather grip and two Pro Overgrips.

highres_269104559.jpeg


Compared to a classic...

highres_269105248.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I had them both, the tc95 in the 63 RA...

Very different frames, not an easy comparison

TC95 better on serves, more plowthrough, more spin (not much more)

Forgiveness, sweetspot, baseline power, turning defense to offense, all that the prince works better.

But the plowthrough... And prince sure makes you sweat less, because of the lower swingweight...

If I was to go tc95 again, I would go 16x19...

If I was to do a more direct comparison, I think maybe tc97 18x20 would feel more like txt 100p...

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Whats the average TC95 63RA (16x19) unstrung SW?

Enviado de meu ONEPLUS A3000 usando Tapatalk
 

beltsman

G.O.A.T.
Hit with my TC95 tonight w/ fb HDX Tour @ 48 lbs. Was somewhat underpowered and hard to get spin. Didn't play well with it. Will let the tension drop and see how it goes.
 
Let's talk TC97s: 16x19 vs 18x20? Besides the average differences between the two patterns is there anything that's really stuck out to you guys? Are there big differences in feel between the two? I've only ever used the 16x19 and am interested in the 18x20. I love my TC95s but I'm still considering switching over to the box beam as I'm starting to realize how much I miss the "old school" feel and added punch in slices and volleys where the 95 is a little flaky. Imo the TC97 has much better feel than the 95 although the 95 is still better feeling than 99% of the commercial racquet market today. The reason it's my main stick right now is because of the pop I get from groundies and serves in case you're wondering why I'm not rocking 97s already. I remember the 97 16x19 to have this unique feel where I could feel the strings snap back upon contact with the ball, can anyone confirm this with the 18x20?
 

smirker

Hall of Fame
Just finished leading my TC90 up and now it feels like home. At 14 ounces this thing rivals the feel of a Prestige Classic 600 or a Pro Staff 85.

I used 12 Sampras power-strips at 3 and 9 (1.5 oz.) and counter-balanced with 0.3 oz. of lead in the handle as well as a Wilson leather grip and two Pro Overgrips.

highres_269104559.jpeg


Compared to a classic...

highres_269105248.jpeg
Mid or MP?
 

Georgo

New User
If you buy 2 rackets at the same time, they will have the same swingweights or it is random?
I have asked Paul for the same SW, the delivery will take a bit longer as he waits for the right ones to pick from the batches to match.
 

topspn

Legend
What about the SW of TC100 63 RA?
Again, I can’t tell you an average. I asked for my SW so able to get close to my targets. Managed to get TC100 63RA with SW just under 305. I think you’d be hard pressed to get SW for either TC100/TC95 under 295. I think lowish SW is around what I got.
 

4-string

Professional
After a few weeks playing the TC95 (but not exclusively) I must say that I like it alot. I struggle a little bit on second serves for some reason, but other than that it feels and plays great. Flat first serves are just ridiculous!

I am positive that I got the incorrect handle shape though. I ordered B, but this has to be A. I strung up a Head racquet last week, the shapes felt identical and much more rectangular than my Wilsons.

In any case, this one is a keeper for the build quality alone. It plays great too, so a no brainer really. :)
 

Jouke

Professional
If you want to know, take the basegrip off and look at what is written on the bare pallet. Does it say 4-H or 4-B?
 

zalive

Hall of Fame
Again, I can’t tell you an average. I asked for my SW so able to get close to my targets. Managed to get TC100 63RA with SW just under 305. I think you’d be hard pressed to get SW for either TC100/TC95 under 295. I think lowish SW is around what I got.

So, par with TC95 63 RA? I expected a bit lower average SW because of a bigger head size...yet if it's about there no complaint as it's expected that a 100'' will have some more power, being more a tweener type racquet.

Can only say about 70RA TC100 - mine is 285 sw. I asked to pick lower sw frame.

So logically just like on TC95, stiffer option has a lower average SW too...
 
I was talking about the Head. Just picked up the MP version. I also have an Angell TC97.

That's the IG Prestige Mid, one of the best feeling frames I've ever used. I had it weighted to 13.2 oz. and it did everything well. So I think the Midplus version would be great especially when customized to your spec. But I've never actually used one.
 
Last edited:

smirker

Hall of Fame
That's the IG Prestige Mid, one of the best feeling frames I've ever used. I had it weighted to 13.2 oz. and it did everything well. So I think the Midplus version would be great especially when customized to your spec. But I've never actually used one.

Thanks. Received my two mp's today. Lovely looking frames. Will add 3g at 3/9 in the first instance and maybe a leather grip. It will be interesting to compare to my TC97.
 

topspn

Legend
So, par with TC95 63 RA? I expected a bit lower average SW because of a bigger head size...yet if it's about there no complaint as it's expected that a 100'' will have some more power, being more a tweener type racquet.



So logically just like on TC95, stiffer option has a lower average SW too...
Again, can't speak of averages just I got what I asked for SW wise in both TC95 and 100. My TC95s are 302, 303 and my 100 also 303. Any of the 70RA will generally be lower in SW then the 63RA frames
 

zalive

Hall of Fame
Again, can't speak of averages just I got what I asked for SW wise in both TC95 and 100. My TC95s are 302, 303 and my 100 also 303. Any of the 70RA will generally be lower in SW then the 63RA frames

Don't worry, I understood. Just trying to guesstimate loud what's going on.

Perhaps a perfect thing would be to have a TC98 63 RA made on TC95/TC100 63 RA design principles, as a half way between the two, having precision somewhere in between, I really appreciate this head size. Would be easier. Back then I had to wait to get the finances right, but in the meantime I quit the idea of getting an 18x20 Angell because...my strokes are really made on open pattern racquets and it seems I bump into the wall of making the most out of 18x20 racquets, for me it's like benefits I can harvest cannot outweight the shortcomings. And since TC95 63 RA might be too hard a cookie for me...I guess it will be TC100 63 RA for me then.
 
Last edited:
Top