RaulRamirez
Legend
I'm seeing all these threads - and replies - built around the idea of "weak draws".
Most of these have been directed against Nadal .
There also seems to be a line of thinking that the powers-that-be have somehow conspired against Federer - arguably, the most popular player ever on the ATP (trying to wrap my head around that one).
So, how do you propose draws be set up? I'm envisioning a positive, solutions-oriented thread. Here are some specific questions to guide your answers. Some may elicit obvious responses.
You can either answer the questions or just propose a sound solution - if you think it's a problem currently.
1. Do you agree that players should be seeded based upon ranking?
2. If players are seeded based on ranking - how many seeds should there be -- 16, 32, even more than 32 (possibly 64)...less than 16?
3. Do you subscribe to the theory (used in all sports I can think of) that if you've earned a higher seed, than you should face an easier draw (on paper, anyway)?
4. Do you want a completely random draw, where anyone can draw anyone (so you can, in theory, get 1 v. 2 in the first round!)?
5. Do you like the range of seeds that are done currently, or would you want it seeded mathematically with no randomness?
6. Any other aspects to consider?
Most of these have been directed against Nadal .
There also seems to be a line of thinking that the powers-that-be have somehow conspired against Federer - arguably, the most popular player ever on the ATP (trying to wrap my head around that one).
So, how do you propose draws be set up? I'm envisioning a positive, solutions-oriented thread. Here are some specific questions to guide your answers. Some may elicit obvious responses.
You can either answer the questions or just propose a sound solution - if you think it's a problem currently.
1. Do you agree that players should be seeded based upon ranking?
2. If players are seeded based on ranking - how many seeds should there be -- 16, 32, even more than 32 (possibly 64)...less than 16?
3. Do you subscribe to the theory (used in all sports I can think of) that if you've earned a higher seed, than you should face an easier draw (on paper, anyway)?
4. Do you want a completely random draw, where anyone can draw anyone (so you can, in theory, get 1 v. 2 in the first round!)?
5. Do you like the range of seeds that are done currently, or would you want it seeded mathematically with no randomness?
6. Any other aspects to consider?
Last edited: