Everybody has a different feeling and experience when it comes to equipment. So, if the 93P is not for you... then it's good you found out. You tried and found that what you currently play with suits you better... that's great (at least for you) as 1) you don't need to buy another racquet; 2) you confirmed your previous choice was a good one for you and you can remove that doubt and keep using it.
Was there anything you did like about the 93P?
I will just quote your comment and answer everyone
I liked the spin potential and how fast it swung through the air.
And regarding the power level, I lacked pace. I managed to hit to the baseline consistently, but it lacked pace and court penetration. Conditions were tough, only 10 degrees, clay and quite wet, so the balls were really heavy. But once I switched to my PS97S after an hour I didn't struggle with pace, so it was the racket, not the conditions.
Regarding a comment about the weight. My racket of choice swings heavier and feels heavier, so the weight of the 93p wasn't the problem. I also used to play the PS90 and the RF97, I generally like heavier rackets.
And I'm also not the typical modern player. I play a strong eastern forehand and a weak eastern one-handed backhand. Use slice and dropshots, so more like an all-court player. No idea what my USTA rating is, but based on clips and texts I've seen and read solid 4.0.
But I agree, was good to see that the 93p isn't for me, saves money and tames my racketaholism
Thanks to everyone though!