If the level is 4 or 5 this racquet is enough but not higher
So you are saying that in their primes Pete Sampras and Ivan Lendl couldn't beat a modern 5.5 player using a Pure Aero?
It wasn't the racquet frame size that changed tennis, it was the polyester strings.
People are just so enamored with Nadal level topspin that they think its the only way to play. But there are pros winning with flatter shots like Del Potro. And to counter a lot of the topspin baseliners, you are seeing resurgence of slice and drop shots (all of which are easier to hit with frames like the 93P).
While I doubt we ever see pros dropping frame sizes to 93P levels again, plenty are still making a living with 95 sq in frames that are no wider than the 93P. Plenty of 4.5-5.0 senior level players using PS90's and 6.1 95's at our club too.
93P is good enough for anyone not making a living at tennis. At every other level there is always someone better than you and always someone worse than you. You win based on whether you are playing the better player or the worse player, not based on your racquet.
It comes down to feel and playstyle. If you like controlling points, being aggressive all over the court, playing a mix of finesse and pace, it's a good racquet. If you like standing 6 feet behind the baseline hitting loopy topspin groundies until someone misses, there are plenty of more fun racquets out there for that style.
