Roger Federer beat Novak Djokovic 6-3, 3-2 retired in the Monte Carlo semi-final, 2008 on clay
Federer would go onto lose the final to Rafael Nadal for the third year in a row. Djokovic had won the pair's previous encounter at Australian Open shortly before
Federer won 58 points, Djokovic 46
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (21/42) 50%
- 1st serve points won (17/21) 81%
- 2nd serve points won (11/21) 52%
- Aces 1, Service Winners 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/42) 21%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (37/62) 60%
- 1st serve points won (22/37) 59%
- 2nd serve points won (10/25) 40%
- Aces 2 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (7/62) 11%
Serve Patterns
Federer served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 7%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 66%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 52 (19 FH, 33 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 5 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 3 Forced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (52/59) 88%
Djokovic made...
- 33 (12 FH, 21 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 2 Forced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (33/42) 79%
Break Points
Federer 3/5 (3 games)
Djokovic 1/4 (2 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Federer 20 (13 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Djokovic 18 (11 FH, 1 BH, 3 FHV, 3 OH)
Federer's FHs - 3 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 5 dtl (1 pass), 3 inside-in (1 runaround return) and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 3 cc passes and 1 dtl at net
Djokovic's FHs - 2 cc passes, 3 dtl, 1 inside-out, 3 inside-in (2 returns) and 2 longline
- BH - 1 dtl
- 1 FHV from a return-approach point
- 1 OH was on the bounce and not a net point
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Federer 21
- 11 Unforced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- 10 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.4
Djokovic 26
- 20 Unforced (13 FH, 7 BH)
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.5
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 6/9 (67%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
Djokovic was...
- 11/15 (73%) at net, with...
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Hard hitting match that's cut short by Djokovic retiring with a sore throat. Whatever's going on with his throat, he doesn't appear to be unduly hampered of play - if at all
There's no holding back from either player in the first set as they trade blows from the back. Even regulation are hit hard - by both men and off both sides - and both are eager to kill points decisively
There are 14 games. Federer has 20 winners, Djoko 18 - winners per game ratio Fed 1.43, Djoko 1.29. It is extremely rare for both players to have higher than 1 winner per game on clay... I can't think of another off the top of my head
Fed's taken to deuce in game 3, but is never in much trouble, having led 40-15 and striking a service winner at deuce. He is in a lot of trouble though in his next service game, where a pair of Djoko FH winners takes him to 15-40. A deep ball draws an error to thwart first break point and on the second, Fed's FH dribbles over net chord for winner. He's still not out of the wood as Djoko return-approaches and puts away a FHV winner to bring up a third break point. Fed saves it with a third ball FH dtl winner
Having told Djoko's parents to 'be quiet' with less than overwhelming politeness at start of next game, Fed return-approaches himself and whacks a decent OH. Djoko slaps it away for a FH cc pass winner. Fed applauds. The game goes 10 points (no break points) and is another FH fest, though its a wild BH winner attempt miss by Fed that ends it
Finally, Djoko is broken in another extended game. A FH cc winner from regulation position from Fed is the pick of the shots in the game, which ends with a ill judged, 3rd ball sharply angled BH cc winner attempt miss from Djoko, who is a bit slow to move to a couple of balls in the game. Nothing concern causing
Second set carries on the same, hard hitting shots way. Fed's taken to deuce in game 2, where Djoko hits a pair of FH inside-in return winners against first serves. A couple of times, Djoko squats to lean on his racquet - again, nothing out of the ordinary
Fed breaks in game 3, passing Djoko BH cc after forcing an awkward BHOH. Next point, Djoko drop shots Fed to net - and a couple of shots later, wishes he hadn't as an OH goes by him. Djoko double faults on break point
Only to break back to love, moving to 0-40 with 3 winners before a Fed FH error
Fed makes it 3 breaks on the trot, in the worst game of the match. There are 8 UEs in 12 points - including the last 6 points. Djoko makes 6 of them, including the last 3 points
At the changeover, he walks over to Federer and concedes the match
Serve & Return
Strong serving by Federer. He hammers balls down with more power than acute placement (by his standards). Curiously, Djoko tends to make the tougher returns and miss the easier ones. Note 4/6 return errors being unforced
He can't make them with much authority though and Fed's in killer mood on third ball (more later)
Djoko serves hard too, and places it well (by his standard). Comparing the two players' serves, Fed's are still better placed... his personal below par of placement is still wider than Djoko's personal above par
Fed's returning is the outstanding feature of serve-return complex, and he makes a huge 88% returns, with reasonable authority though he's prone to blocking back the BH.
On third ball, Djoko plays similarly to Fed but...
Play - Baseline & Net
... he's not as good at for two reasons
a) his serve isn't as strong... the third balls that Fed attacks are weaker and shorter than the ones Djoko does
b) his shot making is a good ways bellow Fed's, which is outstanding
While Fed leads with FH and is lethal with it (13 winners... more than his total 11 UEs, 5 of which are FHs), he hits BHs hard and firm too. Often longline. Despite 0 baseline-to-baseline winners of BH (all his winners are passes or at net), Fed's BH is strongly hit all match. It would be very difficult to beat it down BH-BH even if Djoko could have initiated such rallies (which he can't). Just 6 BH UEs is a good outcome for Fed too - 1 less than Djoko
Djoko doesn't take a step back though. He's not pushed into playing the same attacking game as Fed, he seems to relish it. Action was similar - with slightly lower quality play - in the pair's last match in Australian Open, which Djoko won
He too leads with FH and he too looks for dtl point killers. He's very good at too - though trailing winners by 2, he forces 4 extra errors and thus, actually leads points ended forcefully 28-26. And that's with Fed being better defensively... Djoko's movement is a bit suspect, Fed's is silky and fast. Djoko forcing more errors is also partially due to his attacks not being as decisive. Where Fed hits winners, Djoko can 'only' force errors
Djoko doesn't have Fed's efficiency in attack. 4/11 Fed's UEs are attacking shots or winner attempts or 36%. For Djoko, the figure is 11/20 or 55%
Djoko supplements his attacking groundgame with net play. He's not pushed into it - he starts approaching on his own initiative right from the start. Its a good move and pays off - Djoko wins 73% of 15 approaches, compared to Fed's 67% of 9
Summing up, a very good, fast paced attacking clay match. Cliché though it is, the two players look like two fighters both eager to go for the knockout right out the gate. Federer is better at it before match is cut short by Djokovic's killer sore throat
Stats for final between Federer and Rafael Nadal - https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...dal-vs-federer-monte-carlo-final-2008.645189/
Stats for pair's preceding match, '08 Australian Open semi - https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...derer-australian-open-semi-final-2008.661180/
Federer would go onto lose the final to Rafael Nadal for the third year in a row. Djokovic had won the pair's previous encounter at Australian Open shortly before
Federer won 58 points, Djokovic 46
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (21/42) 50%
- 1st serve points won (17/21) 81%
- 2nd serve points won (11/21) 52%
- Aces 1, Service Winners 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/42) 21%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (37/62) 60%
- 1st serve points won (22/37) 59%
- 2nd serve points won (10/25) 40%
- Aces 2 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (7/62) 11%
Serve Patterns
Federer served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 7%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 66%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 52 (19 FH, 33 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 5 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 3 Forced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (52/59) 88%
Djokovic made...
- 33 (12 FH, 21 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 2 Forced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (33/42) 79%
Break Points
Federer 3/5 (3 games)
Djokovic 1/4 (2 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Federer 20 (13 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Djokovic 18 (11 FH, 1 BH, 3 FHV, 3 OH)
Federer's FHs - 3 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 5 dtl (1 pass), 3 inside-in (1 runaround return) and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 3 cc passes and 1 dtl at net
Djokovic's FHs - 2 cc passes, 3 dtl, 1 inside-out, 3 inside-in (2 returns) and 2 longline
- BH - 1 dtl
- 1 FHV from a return-approach point
- 1 OH was on the bounce and not a net point
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Federer 21
- 11 Unforced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- 10 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.4
Djokovic 26
- 20 Unforced (13 FH, 7 BH)
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.5
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 6/9 (67%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
Djokovic was...
- 11/15 (73%) at net, with...
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Hard hitting match that's cut short by Djokovic retiring with a sore throat. Whatever's going on with his throat, he doesn't appear to be unduly hampered of play - if at all
There's no holding back from either player in the first set as they trade blows from the back. Even regulation are hit hard - by both men and off both sides - and both are eager to kill points decisively
There are 14 games. Federer has 20 winners, Djoko 18 - winners per game ratio Fed 1.43, Djoko 1.29. It is extremely rare for both players to have higher than 1 winner per game on clay... I can't think of another off the top of my head
Fed's taken to deuce in game 3, but is never in much trouble, having led 40-15 and striking a service winner at deuce. He is in a lot of trouble though in his next service game, where a pair of Djoko FH winners takes him to 15-40. A deep ball draws an error to thwart first break point and on the second, Fed's FH dribbles over net chord for winner. He's still not out of the wood as Djoko return-approaches and puts away a FHV winner to bring up a third break point. Fed saves it with a third ball FH dtl winner
Having told Djoko's parents to 'be quiet' with less than overwhelming politeness at start of next game, Fed return-approaches himself and whacks a decent OH. Djoko slaps it away for a FH cc pass winner. Fed applauds. The game goes 10 points (no break points) and is another FH fest, though its a wild BH winner attempt miss by Fed that ends it
Finally, Djoko is broken in another extended game. A FH cc winner from regulation position from Fed is the pick of the shots in the game, which ends with a ill judged, 3rd ball sharply angled BH cc winner attempt miss from Djoko, who is a bit slow to move to a couple of balls in the game. Nothing concern causing
Second set carries on the same, hard hitting shots way. Fed's taken to deuce in game 2, where Djoko hits a pair of FH inside-in return winners against first serves. A couple of times, Djoko squats to lean on his racquet - again, nothing out of the ordinary
Fed breaks in game 3, passing Djoko BH cc after forcing an awkward BHOH. Next point, Djoko drop shots Fed to net - and a couple of shots later, wishes he hadn't as an OH goes by him. Djoko double faults on break point
Only to break back to love, moving to 0-40 with 3 winners before a Fed FH error
Fed makes it 3 breaks on the trot, in the worst game of the match. There are 8 UEs in 12 points - including the last 6 points. Djoko makes 6 of them, including the last 3 points
At the changeover, he walks over to Federer and concedes the match
Serve & Return
Strong serving by Federer. He hammers balls down with more power than acute placement (by his standards). Curiously, Djoko tends to make the tougher returns and miss the easier ones. Note 4/6 return errors being unforced
He can't make them with much authority though and Fed's in killer mood on third ball (more later)
Djoko serves hard too, and places it well (by his standard). Comparing the two players' serves, Fed's are still better placed... his personal below par of placement is still wider than Djoko's personal above par
Fed's returning is the outstanding feature of serve-return complex, and he makes a huge 88% returns, with reasonable authority though he's prone to blocking back the BH.
On third ball, Djoko plays similarly to Fed but...
Play - Baseline & Net
... he's not as good at for two reasons
a) his serve isn't as strong... the third balls that Fed attacks are weaker and shorter than the ones Djoko does
b) his shot making is a good ways bellow Fed's, which is outstanding
While Fed leads with FH and is lethal with it (13 winners... more than his total 11 UEs, 5 of which are FHs), he hits BHs hard and firm too. Often longline. Despite 0 baseline-to-baseline winners of BH (all his winners are passes or at net), Fed's BH is strongly hit all match. It would be very difficult to beat it down BH-BH even if Djoko could have initiated such rallies (which he can't). Just 6 BH UEs is a good outcome for Fed too - 1 less than Djoko
Djoko doesn't take a step back though. He's not pushed into playing the same attacking game as Fed, he seems to relish it. Action was similar - with slightly lower quality play - in the pair's last match in Australian Open, which Djoko won
He too leads with FH and he too looks for dtl point killers. He's very good at too - though trailing winners by 2, he forces 4 extra errors and thus, actually leads points ended forcefully 28-26. And that's with Fed being better defensively... Djoko's movement is a bit suspect, Fed's is silky and fast. Djoko forcing more errors is also partially due to his attacks not being as decisive. Where Fed hits winners, Djoko can 'only' force errors
Djoko doesn't have Fed's efficiency in attack. 4/11 Fed's UEs are attacking shots or winner attempts or 36%. For Djoko, the figure is 11/20 or 55%
Djoko supplements his attacking groundgame with net play. He's not pushed into it - he starts approaching on his own initiative right from the start. Its a good move and pays off - Djoko wins 73% of 15 approaches, compared to Fed's 67% of 9
Summing up, a very good, fast paced attacking clay match. Cliché though it is, the two players look like two fighters both eager to go for the knockout right out the gate. Federer is better at it before match is cut short by Djokovic's killer sore throat
Stats for final between Federer and Rafael Nadal - https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...dal-vs-federer-monte-carlo-final-2008.645189/
Stats for pair's preceding match, '08 Australian Open semi - https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...derer-australian-open-semi-final-2008.661180/
Last edited: