BGod
G.O.A.T.
I am absolutely the type of person who values Roger losing in 5 sets in 3 Wimbledon finals along with his SF loss to Raonic.
But at the same time I also can't dismiss him going 0-3 in finals to Novak. Yes, he wasn't prime Roger of 04-06 but he had ample opportunities in 2014 and 2019 and even in 2015 his form going in was fantastic and he DID go 1/7 on BP chances. This is why I don't consider the 2008 match against Nadal to be as great as most others (1/13 on BP).
Moving forward as well, Novak has won Wimbledon at age 31 and 32 being an earlier bloomer winning his first Slam at 20 (Federer won his first shortly before 22 and was a month away from 33 in 2014 Wimbledon)
Title count is 8>5 obviously but Novak has only lost 1 final.
If we're at all using Roger's career as some type of reference for probability, then Novak should have a chance in 3, maybe 4 more finals.
But at the same time I also can't dismiss him going 0-3 in finals to Novak. Yes, he wasn't prime Roger of 04-06 but he had ample opportunities in 2014 and 2019 and even in 2015 his form going in was fantastic and he DID go 1/7 on BP chances. This is why I don't consider the 2008 match against Nadal to be as great as most others (1/13 on BP).
Moving forward as well, Novak has won Wimbledon at age 31 and 32 being an earlier bloomer winning his first Slam at 20 (Federer won his first shortly before 22 and was a month away from 33 in 2014 Wimbledon)
Title count is 8>5 obviously but Novak has only lost 1 final.
If we're at all using Roger's career as some type of reference for probability, then Novak should have a chance in 3, maybe 4 more finals.
Last edited: