I was watching ESPN's advantage Luke Jensen and he said he doesn't consider Federer to be the best of all time. Also he doesn't think he's the king of wimbledon.
According to him Federer needs to do a "calendar" grand slam 3 times to become the greatest ever. Also he needs to win 8 wimbledons to be considered better than Sampras at Wimbledon.
I don't agree with this, I think if Federer finishes his career with the most grand slams he should considered the greatest of all time. If he wins a French Open along the way then it should be definite however at this point it looks gloomy for Federer at the French.
What do you guys think of Luke Jensen's comments?
Ok, this guy Jensen was already on my nerves. These stupid shows that take up about 1/4 of tennis channel programming is nothing short of annoying, and one of the reasons we're dropping the tennis channel (though certainly not the only one) But this statement of his is beyond stupid.
Lets start with the obvious. Jensen thinks that Federer needs 3 calendar slams because Laver has 2 calendar slams. Now I'm not going to take anything away from Laver as he was obviously an excellent player, however there does seem to be a point that most leave out when talking about Laver. 3 of the 4 slams were played on grass, so there were 2 surfaces to conquer, not 4 like there are now. In my opinion the only one that truly has a grand slam of winning at least once on all 4 surfaces is Agassi. So there's Jensen's first problem with his reasoning. The US Open switched to a hard clay in 1975, and in 1978 switched to hard court. The Australian Open switched from grass to hard court in 1988 (this took a long time to find as the Australian Open site sucks, can't even find past winners on the site)
The second problem is this. How many records are actually left that Federer hasn't broken or tied? And honestly the first 3 I can think of are these. Total number of slams, Total number of Wimbledon Titles and Total number of French Open Titles. I think it's safe to say as far as Federer goes, that last one is quite safe. I mean he has now reached his 9th straight Slam final, and even McEnroe said there's no one even close to that record. He's the only person to win 3 of the slams in 3 consecutive years. I mean my god it would take a post to list off all the records that Federer now holds. He's taken so many away from Sampras that it isn't funny.
And how sweet is it, that it was Federer that stopped Sampras from obtaining his 5th wimbledon in a row, only to obtain that this year. Jensen just needs to shut up and get on with his life. Heck I didn't even know that he was a pro at one time until it was talked about once on one of the programs. I put him in what I call the jealous category, he's jealous of the truly greats because he couldn't do anything in his career, and now uses commentating to say that he's part of tennis.
Jukka