Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
Andre Agassi
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
Bjorn Borg
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
Pete Sampras
Any objection ?
Lendl had five finals just like Wilander but the Czech had more wins on Parisian clay than the Swede.Looks good but maybe Kuerten above Lendl?
The US Open is quite debatable.Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
Andre Agassi
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
Bjorn Borg
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
Pete Sampras
Any objection ?
They will combined to have more slam count and total titles, but few things that they will not match:
1. weeks #1.
2. WTF
3. Wimbledon
4. Total hard court titles
He's got an issue with the number 7 I guess?Where is the seven times Wimbledon Champion?
muh level of playNo Djokovic for Wimbledon even though he’s short 1 of Fed and tied with PETE? LOL
Where is the seven times Wimbledon Champion?
No. Though they both won three RG's, Kuerten never came close to making another final. Guga was 36-8 with 81.82% winning percentage at RG.Looks good but maybe Kuerten above Lendl?
Trinity is too much.Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
Andre Agassi
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
Bjorn Borg
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
Pete Sampras
Any objection ?
Trinity is too much.
Grand Slam Holy Dyad
AO:
Djokovic
Federer
FO:
Nadal
Federer
Wimbledon:
Federer
Sampras
USO:
Federer
Connors
And in direct H2H against Novak and Nadal he is only positive against Rafa at WB.. Other comparison he is either negative or equalSurely there is no objection to Federer being the only player listed 3 times.
French OpenFrench Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Any objection ?
How many is needed? 10?Djokovic fans are kidding themselves if they think his seven Wimbledon titles are going to ever have him considered an all time top 3 on grass.
LOL.. Never took 2 sets against Nadal there.. He only has a title thanks to Soderling.French Open
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Roger Federer
FRENCH OPEN:French Open
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Roger Federer
US OPEN:Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
Andre Agassi
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
Bjorn Borg
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
Pete Sampras
Any objection ?
Djokovic is totally out of contention at Wimbledon because of 2 reasons:Djokovic fans are kidding themselves if they think his seven Wimbledon titles are going to ever have him considered an all time top 3 on grass.
You really gonna diss a 7 time champ that beat your boy 3:0 in wimby finals?Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
Andre Agassi
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Ivan Lendl
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
Bjorn Borg
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
Pete Sampras
Any objection ?
everyone knows his total there is fraudulent. Literally 0 comp other than a half decent nadal a couple of times.No Djokovic for Wimbledon even though he’s short 1 of Fed and tied with PETE and has taken Fed down in 3 straight finals ? LOL
3)He's not on Wimby's rolex commercialDjokovic is totally out of contention at Wimbledon because of 2 reasons:
1) he's received not enough love at SW19
2) his earnings related to his Wimbledon titles are way too low
Hence Roger Federer is the GOAT over there. Q.E.D.
Lmao he never played peak Fed at Wimby. 2012 is all the evidence we needed of what would happen between a peak Fed vs peak Mole matchYou really gonna diss a 7 time champ that beat your boy 3:0 in wimby finals?
Typical fedfans....
Either a Joke or TOTAL NONSENSE!Djokovic is totally out of contention at Wimbledon because of 2 reasons:
1) he's received not enough love at SW19
2) his earnings related to his Wimbledon titles are way too low
Hence Roger Federer is the GOAT over there. Q.E.D.
decent win in 2011 albeit lucky to avoid federer. Owned in 12/13, deserved couple wins over slow and old fed in 14/15 with his improve grass game… complete inflation since. Escape from death in 18/19 then 21/22 the worst 2 slams probably since early 70s, tied with ao23 for how poor they wereLmao he never played peak Fed at Wimby. 2012 is all the evidence we needed of what would happen between a peak Fed vs peak Mole match
everyone knows his total there is fraudulent. Literally 0 comp other than a half decent nadal a couple of times.
depends how the field steps up. if he wins a bunch of Wimbledons vs bums then they won’t make a dent in fed/pete status there. Hc field is strongerWell in that case all of Carlos titles will be fraudulent as well since this era is showing to be even more pathetic and he’s playing the same one Djoker was a few years ago (Medvedev, tstsipas, etc) and haven’t improved a lick since
You could also just go with “Roger Federer is the GOAT over there” becauseDjokovic is totally out of contention at Wimbledon because of 2 reasons:
1) he's received not enough love at SW19
2) his earnings related to his Wimbledon titles are way too low
Hence Roger Federer is the GOAT over there. Q.E.D.
A lot more credible.OP should have gone with this and still made a point ?
Australian Open:
Novak Djokovic
Roger Federer
French Open:
Rafael Nadal
Bjorn Borg
Wimbledon:
Roger Federer
Pete Sampras
US Open
Roger Federer
Jimmy Connors
I like this part. I always appreciate acknowledgement that Roger is a complete package with tennis dynamic several tiers above everyone in every way.Roger Federer (...) played a more complete and dynamic grass game than anyone
Nah. It's money. After all people love Roger because he's GOAT of money rankings. Sport achievements are heavily overestimated.all of which have contributed to making him more beloved as a player than anyone.