will be he be acknowledged as the greatest to ever play tennis ?
NO. Fed will never win FO.
Some commentators will call him so. It would give him an advantage over Sampras. But for all time, there are still people like Laver, Borg, and Tilden, whose records imo are still ahead of Federer at the moment, with the Grand Slam, the RG-Wimbledon double (or in Tildens day the World hard court and Wimbledon double).
No. A bunch of Sampras jock sniffers will open many threads on this message board trying to convince us how awesome Michael Stich, George Bastl, and other players from the 90's are - and claim that Fed is beating a bunch of lames... :roll:will be he be acknowledged as the greatest to ever play tennis ?
Some commentators will call him so. It would give him an advantage over Sampras. But for all time, there are still people like Laver, Borg, and Tilden, whose records imo are still ahead of Federer at the moment
will be he be acknowledged as the greatest to ever play tennis ?
if roger wins tmr, then nadal will win wimbly.
Tiger Woods once said:- If your in the conversation of who is the GOAT in any sport, you have done your job and thats all you can ask for. Roger age 26 and with 5 years of good tennis left and he is already a frontrunner for The Greatest. Nice to be him if you ask me.
He said "if"; it's hypothetical, not "will he win?"
5 years? Wishful thinking maybe?
Why not just talk about Santa Claus if we are just speaking about Hypos?
Borg himself said that if Roger beats Rafa tomorrow, he'll consider him the greatest of all time. So now Agassi, Sampras, Borg, Mcenroe, who else? If you can't go by the opinion of those 4 legends, then I don't know what to say. Now of course, Cyborg will come here mentioning Tilden, Rosewall, Gonzales, etc but it's ok, he thinks it makes him look smart
Borg himself said that if Roger beats Rafa tomorrow, he'll consider him the greatest of all time. So now Agassi, Sampras, Borg, Mcenroe, who else? If you can't go by the opinion of those 4 legends, then I don't know what to say. Now of course, Cyborg will come here mentioning Tilden, Rosewall, Gonzales, etc but it's ok, he thinks it makes him look smart
Wouldn't you consider Borg biased? I mean, c'mon, he came to Wimbledon and openly supported Federer while the other player (Nadal)was also trying to meet one of his records (winning the French and Wimbledon). Not to mention he also called and thanked Roger years ago for not allowing Pete to beat his then record. You believe it because someone else said it? Everyone's opinion is subjective, not to mention it is filtered through their own psyche with motives we know not of.
Wouldn't you consider Borg biased? I mean, c'mon, he came to Wimbledon and openly supported Federer while the other player (Nadal)was also trying to meet one of his records (winning the French and Wimbledon). Not to mention he also called and thanked Roger years ago for not allowing Pete to beat his then record. You believe it because someone else said it? Everyone's opinion is subjective, not to mention it is filtered through their own psyche with motives we know not of.
It isn't only Borg is it? Anyways.. Roger's claim is getting stronger every day. Even if he doesn't win, he adds another one of those finals to his name.
Wouldn't you consider Borg biased? I mean, c'mon, he came to Wimbledon and openly supported Federer while the other player (Nadal)was also trying to meet one of his records (winning the French and Wimbledon). Not to mention he also called and thanked Roger years ago for not allowing Pete to beat his then record. You believe it because someone else said it? Everyone's opinion is subjective, not to mention it is filtered through their own psyche with motives we know not of.
Same goes if Nadal knocks off Federer in the Wimbledon Finals.If Roger manages to knock off the topspin monkey iron man mountain that is Nadal...
I'll be happy for the rest of the year.
Agassi, Borg, Mcenroe, Sampras. Who else?
Well,Borg picked Nadal to win Wimbledon so I don't think he's that biased but I agree everyone can form their own opinion and arguments and there are certainly a couple of players you could make a case for being the greatest ever.
I think Federer will be the GOAT if he wins at least 1 French Open and a total of 15 grand slams to surpass Pete's 14 slams.
as a huge sampras fan (amazing the criticism he gets...yeah, bastl at the end of his career while having an emotional letdown is what we pete fans use as an argument of his competition...btw, any thoughts on michael stich vs. anybody in top ten now, outside of top three (or even two?), let me due something so many fans on these boards have so much touble doing- give others respect, while putting things in context...if fed wins, i have no trouble with the goat title (neither does pete by the way, classier than most), but how about a couplethings fed fans might want to consider...1...duration of dominanace..his run since 2003-4 through 2007 has been the best ever perhaps...what if he loses tomorrow, and continues to suffer losses to nadal, joker, others in big matches to come (pete was 1 in the world for 6 years and would have been 7 imo if not for a back injury in 99...2... fed has been awfully reluctant to play davis cup, unlike nadal, joker, roddick...this gives him more time/rest to prepare for tourneys..pete was criticized for not playing as much as andre and courier, but nevertheless was a key memeber of two championship teams, in particular almost single-handedly winning a final against russia in moscow on red dirt against good claycourt players..easy to dismiss davis cup nowadays, but it is important to the history of tennis, and now that fed has wawrinka in the top ten why doeshe get a pass on that?...btw, i don't really push the competition angle, but looking below top 2 or three in fed's top ten, i'm really beginning to wonder (wonderful performances from davy and ferrer 4&5 on the clay this year)
Some commentators will call him so. It would give him an advantage over Sampras. But for all time, there are still people like Laver, Borg, and Tilden, whose records imo are still ahead of Federer at the moment, with the Grand Slam, the RG-Wimbledon double (or in Tildens day the World hard court and Wimbledon double).
it would be quite hard to make an argument for anyone else, still it is an opinion though
Depends on how you look at it... but, the majority of pro tennis followers use Number-of-Majors-Won as a deciding factor on who is The Greatest of All Time. And I am not even part of this majority: My consideration is based on style of play!
No contest about who looks the best between Federer and Nadal. Nadal is a sexy beast!
thanks truth, i appreciate the compliment, and let me add at least one (painful) thing...borg and pete are my heroes (maybe even a match at the end of the year) and it bothered me greatly when i heard borg made that call to roger about saving his record...all of a sudden bjorn's become very available to the opinionmakers...interestingly, pete's book is coming out this week, so he'll be available (and has been-i swear he's done more interviews the last couple years, all fed-related, than his whole career),However, i don't think he's attended any big tourney, and i don't think he'll call rafa if he wins tomorrow, though rafa has become inextricably tied to pete's legacy)...finally, though they are my heroes, i have to admit i felt let down by the early (my opinion) retirements...needless to say, tomorrow and the last 3-4 years at rolland garros have tested my emotions, and sanity?