Segregation from the majority or mainstream has never resulted in an increase in interest or popularity of the segregated item.this classic forum will increase interest in the classics by making info on them available, impossible with the previous forum and it's useless and finecky search tool....
Ok Deuce, when before I was on the fence, you've convinced me that the segregation is a "bad" idea.
As a lot of people know, my favorite frame is the PS85, but what good is it discussing the frame when only the same people turn up. Not to offend those who've conversed with me over this sub-forum already, but no one "new" has come by.....
At least when easily viewed by more people in the main forum, you'll get the 'young kid' that will ask "what's so special about a St. Vincent" or you'll get the 'older player' that's a new member that will say "I used that frame for many years...."
The traffic here may end up being too low, or just low enough not to spark new discussion......
Although, the counter argument is that the "classic racket" talk gets buried in the main forum.....
Also, since this forum is supported by a major online retailer, cynically I think this could be part of an agenda to intentionally let "classic racket" talk fade into the background.....therefore supporting mostly discussion of current production frames that will definitely lead to sales of their current inventory......
Ok Deuce, when before I was on the fence, you've convinced me that the segregation is a "bad" idea.
As a lot of people know, my favorite frame is the PS85, but what good is it discussing the frame when only the same people turn up. Not to offend those who've conversed with me over this sub-forum already, but no one "new" has come by.....
At least when easily viewed by more people in the main forum, you'll get the 'young kid' that will ask "what's so special about a St. Vincent" or you'll get the 'older player' that's a new member that will say "I used that frame for many years...."
The traffic here may end up being too low, or just low enough not to spark new discussion......
Although, the counter argument is that the "classic racket" talk gets buried in the main forum.....
Also, since this forum is supported by a major online retailer, cynically I think this could be part of an agenda to intentionally let "classic racket" talk fade into the background.....therefore supporting mostly discussion of current production frames that will definitely lead to sales of their current inventory......
Do you think that this is a good idea for a forum?
Before this fancy vBulletin forum, there was the old TW bulletin board and there was no need for a Classic Racquet section. It does for all intensive purposes look like this forum is semi-hidden to promote (hype) the new racquets.
The only way that people other than us will see these threads - and thus learn about the classics and be encouraged to try them - is when threads on classic racquets are incorporated directly in the Racquets section, as they were before the unfortunate birth of this section.
How many people over the years have said that they were encouraged or inspired to try an old classic because of what they read about those racquets? Hundreds of people. And probably 90% of them loved their experience with the classics.
That won't happen anymore if this segregated section continues.
I don't think it would be any less hidden if it were a main forum - because right now, it is rather prominently displayed at the top of the main 'Racquets' page.As I said a couple of days ago, unless more people view this forum, then you are probably correct
However, I'm sure you would agree that at the moment, this "Classic" forum is hidden. If more people can easily find it, and it's still the same people using it then fair enough. But it needs to be on main index page to give it a chance, surely!!!
It really needs to be on main index page as:-
Racquets (New, Current)
Racquets (Classic, Discontinued)
Then we will know if more people are viewing it, when they can find it
^ Well expressed.I don't like it as it is now. It seems marginalized to me, almost like a hidden link or afterthought.
When these topics were mixed in with the "new racket" chatter, it was more interesting in my opinion. Now the classic forum portion seems to me more like a small club, somewhat elitist, and dominated by some zany characters. At times the stream of consciousness monologues or pop culture soundbytes of certain folks annoys and drives me away for a while, but that's just my personality.
At any rate, if this passion for the classics stays divided from the overall discussion, many of the younger set (seems like most of the posts in the "normal" Racquets section are by enthusiasts of less than 18 years of age, sometimes!) will not hear about some of these classic pieces of equipment, or what it's like to hit tennis balls with them. Or perhaps that they're still legitimate pieces of tennis gear, and relevant in our favorite sport.
Just my $0.02...
I did mention that the above post was a good one, right?I don't like it as it is now. It seems marginalized to me, almost like a hidden link or afterthought.
When these topics were mixed in with the "new racket" chatter, it was more interesting in my opinion. Now the classic forum portion seems to me more like a small club, somewhat elitist, and dominated by some zany characters. At times the stream of consciousness monologues or pop culture soundbytes of certain folks annoys and drives me away for a while, but that's just my personality.
At any rate, if this passion for the classics stays divided from the overall discussion, many of the younger set (seems like most of the posts in the "normal" Racquets section are by enthusiasts of less than 18 years of age, sometimes!) will not hear about some of these classic pieces of equipment, or what it's like to hit tennis balls with them. Or perhaps that they're still legitimate pieces of tennis gear, and relevant in our favorite sport.
Just my $0.02...
I did mention that the above post was a good one, right?
I don't like it as it is now. It seems marginalized to me, almost like a hidden link or afterthought.
When these topics were mixed in with the "new racket" chatter, it was more interesting in my opinion. Now the classic forum portion seems to me more like a small club, somewhat elitist, and dominated by some zany characters. At times the stream of consciousness monologues or pop culture soundbytes of certain folks annoys and drives me away for a while, but that's just my personality.
At any rate, if this passion for the classics stays divided from the overall discussion, many of the younger set (seems like most of the posts in the "normal" Racquets section are by enthusiasts of less than 18 years of age, sometimes!) will not hear about some of these classic pieces of equipment, or what it's like to hit tennis balls with them. Or perhaps that they're still legitimate pieces of tennis gear, and relevant in our favorite sport.
Just my $0.02...
I don't understand why some of you insist on failing to see what seems to be very obvious - that even if the younger people knew of the existence of this section, they would still avoid it, as anything "old" does not appeal to 98% of them...
... and that when these youngsters have found out about these classic racquets, it has almost always been by accident - by entering a thread where they didn't know that the subject was an old classic racquet, for example.
And these 'accidents' can only happen if things go back to the way they were, with ALL racquets being in the Racquets section, without segregation.
As long as this segregated section exists, it will be doing little more than preaching to the converted.
Actually, it has been historically proven that segregation segregates...these kids snort nintendo (no-friendo), and mainline MTV. It will take time before they appreciate the classics. This is a club to honor the classics. Your continuous claims that its autonomy makes it discreet are absurd.
Actually, it has been historically proven that segregation segregates...
Umm... look it up.
It's also common sense.
Not to mention the fact that it's always the same people appearing and reappearing in this segregated section...
Even with you acting as the clown, the kids aren't coming into this circus...
good... let them be kids and enjoy themselves, this is the adult table...if it was a circus they would light up, as their bright primary pure view of their childlike utopia would be momentarily magically realized. Besides violence and pornography; there are other less obvious mature matters not meant for kids. Refined bland foods, sour foods, artisan foods, children are not meant to appreciate War and Peace, or some of the moving poignant and tragic non-fiction out there...let them be kids and love what is popular now, just like we did back then...if they develop an interest in this stuff...great, it is a sign that they are exceptional and mature, if they don't throw tantrums like some of the posters on this thread, they are welcome to sit and eat with the adults!!!
T-dub,
I'll state it again, if we have to have the two separate sections at least put the Classic section right next to the main forum page.
-SF