Weird H2H
- Thread starter Dutch-Guy
- Start date
veroniquem
Bionic Poster
Nadal-Federer 13-7 
Nadal-Federer 13-7
Tu blagues ou quoi? What's weird about it?
Giggs The Red Devil
Rookie
Santoro-Safin 7-2. Spooky.
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
Good confession, that is weird statstic.Nadal-Federer 13-7
P_Agony
Banned
Hrbaty vs Federer 2-0
Simon vs Federer 2-0
Hrbaty vs Nadal 3-1
Murray vs Federer 6-3
Bammer vs Serena 2-0
Golovin vs Venus 2-0
Add other names and h2h
Didn't Federer beat Hrbaty at last year's Wimbly?
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
My bad.He got straight setted in R1.But still leads 2-1 over TMF is kinda weird.
GasquetGOAT
Hall of Fame
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
Hm, well, thats how good Edberg was, when he played Muster he didnt even allowed Muster to take time for a toilet-break, he attacked everything.
You didn't get it.We are talking about loopsided h2h but about less talented players having a better h2h over the more talented ones.
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
Youre a great kid!
drwood
Professional
Hence Martinez over Navratilova and Durie over Graf and Haarhuis over Sampras
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
T
TheMagicianOfPrecision
Guest
That is weird...really weird
He was one of the few guys that beat Federer at his peak.
Sampras:
4-6 vs Krajicek
4-5 vs Hewitt
4-5 vs Stich
0-1 vs Noah
1-2 vs Roddick
The-Champ
Legend
Agassi had trouble controlling it. Even prime fed would have trouble controlling enqvist.
Last edited:
BreakPoint
Bionic Poster
luckyboy1300
Hall of Fame
Wawrinka-Nalbandian: 5-2
drwood
Professional
Agassi only had trouble controlling Enqvist until he realized that Enqvist's running FH was FAR weaker than his stationary FH...then he started owning Enqvist.
Prime Fed would run Enqvist around and eventually start dominating their H2H.
darthpwner
Banned
Federer-Sampras 1-0
jamesblakefan#1
G.O.A.T.
Sampras 16-4 over Courier.
drwood
Professional
That's not too surprising, though. Courier could get served off the court, and Sampras would always find a way to crack open a long rally on a big point with his running FH (1st set of 93 Wimbledon final is classic example of this).
Basically after 91, Sampras owned Courier everywhere, especially in slams:
92 US Open SF
93 Wimbledon F
94 Aus Open SF
95 Aus Open QF
95 US Open SF
96 French QF
only exception was 94 French QF
petetheileet
Rookie
i think rafter v federer is 3-0
GraniteHoosier
Rookie
Ferrer v Roddick 4-3 (3-2 on hard courts)
jwbarrientos
Hall of Fame
Yeah, still remember those two back-to-back (Indian Wells + Miami) matches that won Cañas.
Shaolin
G.O.A.T.
Thats not surprising at all. Sampras >>>>>Courier
edmondsm
Legend
Last edited:
valiant
Hall of Fame
Glad to see you think that's weird.
well she finally admitted who is better :twisted:
vive le beau jeu !
Talk Tennis Guru
kafelnikov
Rookie
Kafelnikov - Bjorkman 11-0
Maybe it's just me, but I think that's strangely lopsided.
Maybe it's just me, but I think that's strangely lopsided.
boredone3456
G.O.A.T.
Wow those are weird..well the Kafelnikov one is, and so is the Courier one a little bit.
Some other weird womens ones I found for Amy Frazier
against Sanchez Vicario she is 4-3
against Pierce she is 4-3
against Shriver she is 4-1
against Henin she is 2-1
when I think of Frazier I think of like...40 first round slam losses..than I saw these and was sort of surprised. Granted she has really bad H2H's against a lot of people..which makes these a bit weirder.
It is surprising considering Courier was a better player than Sampras up until 1993 and even about equal a player to him in 2003. You would think Courier would have ratched up alot more than 4 wins during those years anyway.
1
1970CRBase
Guest
Sampras vs Courier
Another poster has noted this before : their head to head is slightly misleading. If you were watching their matches in the 90's or if you look closely at their match scores, you will see LOTS of hard fought 7-6's 7-5's, 6-4's sets. It just turned out that Pete was able to gain the upper hand on Courier. Also, look at the surfaces they were playing on.
Another poster has noted this before : their head to head is slightly misleading. If you were watching their matches in the 90's or if you look closely at their match scores, you will see LOTS of hard fought 7-6's 7-5's, 6-4's sets. It just turned out that Pete was able to gain the upper hand on Courier. Also, look at the surfaces they were playing on.
Similar threads
