Fed Kennedy
Legend
Btw, that was post #1000 in your awesome thread Ross. Might be an omen!
Btw, that was post #1000 in your awesome thread Ross
Q for all you racketahoilcs...
Do you BELIEVE in your racket?!...
My esteemed fellow TTer and Pure Control connoiseur McLovin made me think when he replied/told me recently about playing in a wood racket tournament, and using a Butch Bucholz frame, playing and beating some 4.5/5.0's in the final... "For me, it was just believing the ball would come in, and then I started hitting all my normal shots. I guess what I'm saying is, once you believe in the stick, you can do just about anything...within reason. "
This morning, guys, as I hit the courts for the first time properly in a week, I'm going with McLovin here... I'm with The Monkees on this one... I've seen the light!... 'I'm a believer!"
R
Ross should go Yonex....lol
im guessing that you didnt quite believe enough??
Did you get overrun with the pc+ this week. What's happened Ross?
When the paypal is fat, no frame is safe...
The ?, I'm afraid, is Meaghan's very prized BC20. It's special. Feel is spectacularly solid. Pockets the ball like a dream. Depth is so easy. Was absolutely NOT what I expected a 40-something flex to feel like (it really does have to be hit with to be understood; now I get it). It truly feels like an older frame, a Pro Staff or even a woodie, more so than anything I can compare it to today. The feel is full and solid, and I have to compliment Vantage on creating something like this to add to their already stellar custom frames. After demoing several Donnays and buying the Dark Red, in terms of the specialty brands, Vantage kills Donnay, in my opinion, in terms of feel. The frames they produce just feel so good, so solid, and they thump the tennis ball.
So, onward I go, four different frames, all of them special, with the BC20 now the top dog in the mix, I think. Last night, once I settled in after a loose first set, I was crushing my flat heaters, the kickers were jumping, and on the ground my backhand was getting deep just about every shot, my touch/drop shots were like Creamsicles and I floated not a single slice -- they all stayed low and driving. I even hit a backhand slice winner down-the-line, a winner because it just stayed so low and the guy swung and missed on the run.
Interesting to read. Some of the UKRHs (Meaghan, most visibly) have been championing this and singing its praises for a while. FWIW, I found the older Vantage frames (the 221) to be superb and everything they are cracked up to be.. excellent quality build, crispier than crisp, lowish power, great control... keep us up-dated.
Q. If you could compare it to a modern frame, what comes to mind?
R
That's kind of what I mean - I was trying to think of something and I was at a loss. Maybe this is blasphemy, as it's so revered and maybe I'm off, but from my own recollection of having hit with it for kicks for a couple weeks about a year ago, the venerable PS85 is what it probably FEELS SOMEWHAT - and I mean somewhat - closely to, though it's not quite as point-and-shoot responsive in the control department. The way the ball REACTS is more so kind of 6.1 95ish, but in a lighter form (which also probably means a touch less plow if I were to compare side to side, but just a touch). The ball shoots easily. The 'recoil' effect that's been discussed, it's kind of a mini catapult that - closest I can think of, here - is kinda sorta like Wilson's PWS system that, to me, really makes the sweet spot a real SWEET spot in that the ball just shoots off the frame with a lot of power when you want it to. Problem with the 6.1 95 has always been the weight, though. This one, the ball does similar things - easy power and depth, killer slices, fantastic oomph on serves, etc - is very 6.1 95ish but in a lighter package. So the 'recoil' effect, to me it's more of a sweeter sweet spot (pocketing, ball then just JUMPS off the frame) that you get with the Wilson PWS system.
But even that description, I'm not COMPLETELY sold on even myself. It's just the CLOSEST I can think of to describe. With the 'recoil' term thrown about and the super low flex -- with that I anticipated a super soft feeling frame that I would potentially hate, since I veer more towards stiffness and solidity more so than soft and flexiness. But this is just kind of a weird, different animal, but in a very good way. Has the pretty raw, wholly solid feel of an older racquet but seems to be made more for the modern game.
Good stuff and excellent review JG. Never hit with the 85 but i found the pt600 and Austrian graphite pro and comfort edge very similar in feel. Plush but solid with similar ball pocketing and on tap power.
I always preferred a closed pattern too but the last 6months i have not missed it with this racket. I tried my old TT rad the other week and the lower trajectory etc freaked me out a bit.
Totally hooked on this racket now. Not touched another in a long time and completely happy with every aspect. Added to that my string choice and my level of play has gone from strength to strength.
Cant wait for TW to take these as they Will soon be flying off the shelves. They are that good!
Ross, you'd better add the Volkl Organix 8 to your demo list. You'll probably want to add some lead, but it plays like an APD only a little softer and not quite as much spin.
My dilemma here, and maybe I'm not alone on this one...is the constant battle between myself of loving mid sized frames, but knowing their obsolete for tennis today. If you look at the ATP you have 1 prominent figure using a mid, Federer, almost no one else, except Robin Haase who uses a prestige mid.
Mids feel great, but I wasn't willing to get beaten by players who I was better than because it felt nice. There are tweener-ish racquets out there that feel good too, though. *cough* Ti.Radical *cough*
I really wish I could be as confident as you guys in that assumption, but i'm a tournament player, I can tell you I lost a lot more with a racquet I loved (prestige mid) then with the babolat. My coach has spoken to a fair amount of atp players, lower ranked (200-350) to be precise some coming from the same places we train, grew up with prestige mid, and now they have changed to tweener type frames. The simple physics coincide with the modern game, more sq inches, more room for heavy topspin strokes, on the slow courts of today's modern game. Trust me, I want to believe you guys, but I've seen first hand the performance these racquets are giving over the mids.
Many pros now are in their early 20s. That would put them at 10 years old when Federer played Sampras. They were babies in the mid 90s. I highly doubt any of them started out using a PS85 or a PC600. New racquets may work well for modern strokes, but you don’t need modern stroke to win. If Safin was in his early 20s he’d still be wrecking face with his shots and his PC600. So basically I’d say use the racquet that suits your game. If you have a game like Djokovic or Nadal where it looks like you’re swinging a bullwhip instead of a tennis racquet, then go for it. If you have a more classic game like Safin, Federer or Petros then I don’t see how using a mid would hamper that.
I feel the same bro. Even though the Radical is 94sq in I believe. & I agree on the Ti.radical, my friend has 5 and he wont part with them. He doesn't even think about all these newer frames.
Safin is a 6'6 muscle monster. I'm no where near his physicality or height. No one in the top 20 or any prospects are using mids, I would think for a reason. Theres no benefit to it. Even someone like Raonic who is classical, big serve, big forehand get to the net is not using a pc600. Look my intentions weren't to turn this thread into a mid/tweener war. I was just posting my thoughts on racquetholicism and my inner troubles with the love of mids, and the undeniable performance of tweeners. Ideally inbetween is a 95, and I think this is where I will go. Thank you Devilito. Btw nice game, saw your youtube vids, sick backhand.
Yeah, I have never been that into volkls..the grip even bugs me as well.
The summers down here are so brutal. It makes me appreciate the lighter TGK I have. I was getting pretty worn out this weekend, and just could not pull the trigger on grabbing my retail prestige out of the bag since it is .4 ozs heavier than my others (definitely lost out on the QC there).
For some reason it weighs 12.5 oz with no mods, 18 gauge string, OG and Dampener. Not a huge problem when I have energy, but enough of a problem to where I am pretty sure in order to free up spot in the bag, the decision to sell it for now is a wise one.
I'm real close to buying a black ace, but I like the prestiges so much..it almost makes more sense to try the MP, since it is lighter and balanced with that awesome prestige serve that has really changed my game. I finally started getting in a groove with my serve again with the prestige..figured out timing and toss issues I was having and started hitting some nice bombs with no effort. Interesting thing is that it seems to all click consistently with the lighter TGK the easiest.
Only bummer about the MP is it's 21mm, which is not a huge deal, but the beamtard in me weeps slightly. I love the Prestiges..freaking awesome sticks. It really is a pleasure to hit with these things. I was hurting bad today..it just started to get super hot here, but even feeling like I was going to pass out, I managed to hit a lot of really sick winners that were right on the lines. I could not see myself doing that with any other racquet. It pretty much made me realize I am a prestige guy and need to stay with what works.
When it gets hot in FL, it makes you question your decision to even walk onto the court. It is that brutal sometimes. I do get used to it, but I remember going through this last year and switching to a little less demanding stick that swung a hair lighter. I am thinking that could happen again, so I am going to try out the MP and will probably be good to go. I have no desire to go to full tweener land or anything like that. I want feel, control, a great serving stick and the ability to go full poly at 50#s. The Prestiges fulfill all of those requirements maybe better than any other racquet out there.
stuff.
Ok so I am not insane about the leather grip then..that is good.
I usually stick to the racquets for at least 6 months. I just had an insane urge to try a prestige..realized it was ideal for my strokes (I have a long swing) and now am just getting the right specced one.
You have to understand that my strokes are finally back to where they should be, and my serve is finally rounding into form. I am at the point where the 4.0 guys I used to lose to I can now beat and look good doing it. So with that happening, I learned what works for me. When I was hitting like this before I had a Prince 90 and then a Head Graphite Master (still have the Master BTW..it is a pretty sweet racquet, but I can't find grommets for it) and was a teenager player usta tournies.
So yeah, I think you will see me sticking with the prestiges, because they have made me a better, more consistent player. This is just some fine tuning, and no real big switching is going on anymore. Trust me, you have to feel this heat to understand what it can do to your will to play tennis sometimes.
The bummer is that TGKs can be laid up multiple ways and there was only 1 available when I bought it. The layup makes the huge difference I think, it changes a lot. So while I could find another TGK 237.3 with some serious hunting, it would probably not have the same layup.
Regardless, I am selling sticks..having a little clearance going on because at the end of the day I only need 2 identical prestiges, because they are very good on strings. My worst case situation is I have a PC600 backing up my TGK. I can think of way worse problems to have in tennis .
Everyone: I'm definitely jumping on the Tour Bite train that's been going traveling around here lately, picking up more and more passengers. What a great, crisp feeling string. I wonder if a full bed of it will tweak the elbow over time, though?
T
For some reason it weighs 12.5 oz with no mods, 18 gauge string, OG and Dampener.