Is Djokovic even playing? Wikipedia says he is though ATP website says he isn't
Why won't Djokovic play here?
Surprised to see Murray playing Basel since Paris and London are straight afterwards. Maybe he feels he owes the tournament for pulling out last year?
Good of Novak not to play, he will be fresher for the last two tournaments of the year.
I think Murray will skip Paris, i'm not sure of course...
Yes, I've heard people discuss that. Guess we will have to wait and see.
All 3 are playing? :shock: Wow tough competition there for a 500. It worked out just fine for Fed at Dubai though. In my opinion, whoever gets Murray in his half will get screwed (just like Shanghai and Dubai for that matter) unless Murray has an early exit.Federer, Novak and Murray playing. After Djokovic's win at Shangai, I think the gap between #1 and #2 currently is 190 points? A tall order for Federer to finish YE #1, but winning this tournament will help.
is this next week ? and why is murray trying to rain on roger's parade by playing in this one ? he doesn't need the points does he ?
LOL. Considering the number of times Fed has rained on Murray's parade at Wimby and WTFs, this question shouldn't be asked
Probably not a fair comparison. Wimby and the WTF are both top tournaments that all the top players are expected to play. Basel, a mere 500, is entirely optional.
I don't think Murray is trying to cramp Federer's style. I think he just wants to stay as match-fit as possible in readiness for London.
Muzza committing suicide with this hectic schedule he's inherited in the last couple of years.
Doesn't matter. Once you enter the "conversation of the elite", you have to do what it takes to stay there, yes?
(I still think they should trim that schedule. I think it's interesting that Roger finally got on that bandwagon after his Shanghai loss, when Rafa's been saying it for years.)
LOL. Considering the number of times Fed has rained on Murray's parade at Wimby and WTFs, this question shouldn't be asked
i know but Murray owns roger now like he is little pet. it is almost sad
what did roger say? funny he's always just been clever in scheduling, i guess now he's older plus having to play a fair bit to be number one, he's disagreeing with his younger self.
I think Nishikori or delPo - but if Murray and Fedex do play, I'm going A-Train
Doesn't matter. Once you enter the "conversation of the elite", you have to do what it takes to stay there, yes?
(I still think they should trim that schedule. I think it's interesting that Roger finally got on that bandwagon after his Shanghai loss, when Rafa's been saying it for years.)
i know but Murray owns roger now like he is little pet. it is almost sad
ill tell you whats sad - this kind of posts
only murray can own federer despite trailing him 0-3 in majors and 1-9 in sets, what a player
ill tell you whats sad - this kind of posts
only murray can own federer despite trailing him 0-3 in majors and 1-9 in sets, what a player
Murray does own Federer in best of 3 matches though and that is what this event is, so in relevance in talking about what is most likely to happen here it makes sense to favor Murray.
Roger owns Basel, as in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2011
Right. Next title, he can surpass Mac. Then what does he do about Connors? He would have to win 32 more titles.