m2nk2
Hall of Fame
Agassi: 8 Slams, 17 Masters
Djokovic: 8 Slams, 21 Masters
They have similar playing styles, but who would win if the conditions were like they were in the mid 90s? For example: Faster courts/balls and gut strings.
Of course Agassi skipped a number of AOs and W and was fairly unmotivated through years of his career. And many would say his prime was in a very strong era. Djokovic has an equal number of Slams but more Masters. Then Djokovic has been more consistent, hasn't skipped Slams in the same way and played in what some people would describe as a rather weak era.
Who'd win if they met 10 times in each slam, both in their prime?
Djokovic: 8 Slams, 21 Masters
They have similar playing styles, but who would win if the conditions were like they were in the mid 90s? For example: Faster courts/balls and gut strings.
Of course Agassi skipped a number of AOs and W and was fairly unmotivated through years of his career. And many would say his prime was in a very strong era. Djokovic has an equal number of Slams but more Masters. Then Djokovic has been more consistent, hasn't skipped Slams in the same way and played in what some people would describe as a rather weak era.
Who'd win if they met 10 times in each slam, both in their prime?
Last edited: