Centre Court
Semi-Pro
Yes I know last year federer took him to 5 sets on one leg, but he's still dangerous, and I would go on the rampage if he won federer , AGAIN
I'm always scared/worried for every match federer plays in grand slams
I wouldn't be worried you guys, the only guys who can take him out are Djokovic in the semi's and Cilic in the final. Even those two need to put on a world class performance to do so and even that might not be enough if Rog is at his very best. Rog would need to play really poorly to lose to anyone else. For me Rog is 45/55 likely to win the title, not odds on but the clear favorite
Roger will never be as clear a favourite on grass no matter what his level compared to Nadal on clay because the competition is much stronger on grass.
Raonic has a huge serve and is strong mentally.
and is strong mentally.
strong mentally.
No it's because Federer isn't as great on grass as Nadal is great on clay.
The jinx is in.
The most dominant specialist in history.No it's because Federer isn't as great on grass as Nadal is great on clay.
No it's because Federer isn't as great on grass as Nadal is great on clay.
I don't believe in jinxing
Ever seen deathnoteSame here!
It's silly to assume that what I write here will have any effect on the match
Ever seen deathnote
You found it.I am sorry, I didn't get you. What is that? Google search gave me a link of a Japanese series, no I haven't
That. Raonic has a horrible backhand. Not Sock horrible but pretty damn close.All i know is that for Raonic to win this he has to put up a far better performance than his last slam quaterfinal. Lols, i still remember those backhands.
Fed getting tight at key moments would help.
No it's because Federer isn't as great on grass as Nadal is great on clay.
I'm no more concerned than I would usually be for a quarter final. Unusually confident that Fed's got this! But a huge part of that could be because I expect Djokovic to knock him out in the semis! Look at it this way, if he doesn't play well enough to beat current Milos, he isn't beating any version of Djokovic.
Why don't you ask Nadal where the competition is greater, grass or clay? His results speak for themselves.
Why don't you ask Federer or Sampras where the competition is greater, grass or clay? His results speak for themselves.
No, it's because competition is strong on grass.
"On clay you don't need to have a volley," Federer says. "You almost don't need to have a serve. All you need to have is legs, an incredible forehand and backhand and to run things down. I'm not trying to take anything away from Rafa, because he's an exception and he did everything on other surfaces as well, but I think you can get away with having problems with your game on clay more than you can on other surfaces."
"On clay, I don't want to say it's too simple, that you just have to keep the ball in court and wait for a mistake, but sometimes it's too easy."
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...a-volley-or-a-serve-its-too-easy-1979825.html
Game. Set. Match.
Point taken, but Raonic doesn't play afraid of anyone.
"On clay you don't need to have a volley," Federer says. "You almost don't need to have a serve. All you need to have is legs, an incredible forehand and backhand and to run things down. I'm not trying to take anything away from Rafa, because he's an exception and he did everything on other surfaces as well, but I think you can get away with having problems with your game on clay more than you can on other surfaces."
"On clay, I don't want to say it's too simple, that you just have to keep the ball in court and wait for a mistake, but sometimes it's too easy."
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...a-volley-or-a-serve-its-too-easy-1979825.html
Game. Set. Match.