I think Nadal's problems are more physical than mental, although obviously the physical issues are going to have an effect on his mentality.
I think Nadal's problems are more physical than mental, although obviously the physical issues are going to have an effect on his mentality.
I disagree. I think it is the other way around--i.e. more mental than physical. So I agree with BJK.
I could see the physical fatigue too. But, we cannot underestimate the mental part. An interesting quote about this:I think Nadal's problems are more physical than mental, although obviously the physical issues are going to have an effect on his mentality.
Oh come on. The signs have been clear since 2012, when he was gone from tennis for 7 months. He came back and played his way into excellent form once again with an excellent 2013, but since the 2014 Australian Open he hasn't looked the same, aside from 1 more French Open title.
Nadal plays a grinding style of tennis, has been at the top of his sport since 2005 playing that style, having dominated tennis on clay so utterly for so long. He isn't getting any younger either.
I could see the physical fatigue too. But, we cannot underestimate the mental part. An interesting quote about this:
"He is the first player I have actually heard at that level say he has absolutely no confidence," said Ilana Kloss, a former doubles champion and current commissioner of World TeamTennis.
I also agree it's more physical than mental. At some point it has to be physical decline, and that seems like right now. He just turned 29. It makes sense.
If you say it's mental then that means that when Nadal sorts this out, whatever it is, he'll be as good as he was once upon a time. He's not getting back to 2013 level where he won 2 majors and 5 MS in one year. I'm pretty sure about that.
I still think he wins 1 (2 at most) more major(s), but this is not mental anymore.
Is it that he's gotten older and getting back in top form after long layoffs is thus harder?
We've seen what a beast he is on return from his many injury time-outs, so why is this time different? This time he was away for a minor operation, it wasn't even an injury.
So, why is there a mental/no confidence issue? It's really weird tbh
No, I don't think he will be as good as he was once upon a time and obviously there is some physical decline with his movement but I think most of his problems are mental and that is causing the physical problems. I don't know if the confidence issues are because of some injury he had and he is afraid to do what he did in the past physically or if he has noticed a slight slow down as he ages and that is making him lose confidence. Something is going on there.
I still think he will come back and win a couple of more slams and I still don't feel that Federer's record is completely safe. We will find out in the next year.
Is it weird, really? I think it's amazing that Nadal has been this successful for this long with his style of play. Muster was a player with a very similar playing style to Nadal, and he had a quick decline after his hugely successful period from February 1995 to March 1997. By 1999, he was struggling to win matches on the tour, even though he said he had been working harder than ever in practice and with his racquets to try and get things right, yet his match results only went downhill. Hewitt was a grinder who had a quick decline. Chang is another etc.
Nadal is mentally crushed because he only has a Plan A(uber grind). There is no Plan B(quick strike tennis) and if he tries he'll end up out of the top 10 and def no more big titles and no more King of Clay.
He's f***ed.
Nadal can't last.
I see the main problem being one of physicality. He knows it and it crushes him mentally. These are tough times for Nadal, and one of the most fascinating things to see will be how Nadal sorts out his issues (if he can).
But he certainly has a multitude of issues right now, though it's worth remembering that he's still a top player - some perspective, lol.
It doesn't have to be a conspiracy theory all the time you know. Something doesn't have to be going on every time Nadal (or any other ATG) is on a down slope. He's 29. I don't think it's as hard to explain as you're trying to make it.
Was Federer's 2010 decline more mental than physical? I would say no. Was Federer the same physically in 2010 as he was in 2007 for example? Again, IMO no.
Nadal will win one major IMO, but his issues are physical at this point to me.
As usual, we agree. I think Nadal is finally starting to realize that his style is catching up to him, and that is making/compounding the mental issues. I do think it's a bit of both, but it starts with the physical side.
It's no shame. He's been a pro seemingly forever, but it should be said that guys with styles like Nadal have faded quickly before. None quite as great as Nadal, to be fair.
Federer was not injured throughout his career (with absences) the way Nadal allegedly has been. They are completely different players.
I agree with you that at age 29 with all that mileage there is going to be some physical and mental decline but IMO from what I am seeing right now with his game it appears to be more on the mental side of things.
We are going to find out in the next year. Sit tight.
Muster faded fast. After winning 1997 Miami, he was the clear world number 2, had gone 111-5 on clay in 1995-1996, and had won 21 tournaments in just over 2 years. He never won another tournament after 1997 Miami, and only reached 2 more tournament finals (1997 Cincinnati, 1998 Estoril). In 1999, he could barely win a match. After the 1999 French Open, he left tennis.
We can look at what happened to Hewitt after 2005, and what happened to Chang after 1997.
Muster faded fast. After winning 1997 Miami, he was the clear world number 2, had gone 111-5 on clay in 1995-1996, and had won 21 tournaments in just over 2 years. He never won another tournament after 1997 Miami, and only reached 2 more tournament finals (1997 Cincinnati, 1998 Estoril). In 1999, he could barely win a match. After the 1999 French Open, he left tennis.
We can look at what happened to Hewitt after 2005, and what happened to Chang after 1997.
I'm buckled in for the ride. Nadal's response to these problems should be fascinating.
Agree. Pretty obvious.
29 yo with 12 y of grinding mileage.
LOL @ comparing Muster, Hewitt and Chang to Nadal, an ATG.
Weren't you the one saying Nadal would win this FO come hell or high water again a few days ago? Now that he lost to Djokovic in the QF you are all of a sudden saying he is a cripple?
Cool story bro. But Nadal has lost to 9 different players this year, not even all of them in top 10.IMO, the real problem is Djokovic has become too good. Not only Nadal could not beat him the all the top players who have played Djokovic this year could not beat him.
i think he should get a sports psychologist and it would help if he developed some of that self assurance/overconfidence/arrogance that djokovic and federer (i think federer hides his) have...maybe uncle toni trained him to think of himself too modestly?
Cool story bro. But Nadal has lost to 9 different players this year, not even all of them in top 10.
It's not 2011 anymore. This time it's about Nadal himself, not about Djoko.
In all fairness, style and greatness don't have much if anything in common. If Nadal is burned out (I don't think he is, to be clear), it doesn't matter if he's an ATG or if he's Nadal, he can't do much about it short of maybe taking another break.
The comparison is made on styles not level of greatness.
yeah but he kept on improving. He beat some good players at the French Open.
Had his QF not been Djokovic, he probably could have made it to the Semi-Final
Anyone maybe except Federer or Ferrer would beat him among the players who reached QF stage.
IMO, the real problem is Djokovic has become too good. Not only Nadal could not beat him the all the top players who have played Djokovic this year could not beat him.
No it's not part of the problem. There are 8 other players out there Nadal could not "hang with". That goes way beyond the matchup with Djoko.Yes, this is part of the problem. It's not like anybody else has been able to hang with Djokovic physically for the long haul either.
There is absolutely no guarantee he would have beaten either Murray or Wawa (who both tore him apart during clay season). He did not play good players before quarter at RG. He played the lowest ranked players of all the favorites by far. Then he played Sock, a completely inexperienced newbie at RG.yeah but he kept on improving. He beat some good players at the French Open.
Had his QF opponent not been Djokovic, he probably could have made it to the Semi-Final
and that's my point. No matter how good you are, you run into Djokovic right now and you are toasted.
Federer was not injured throughout his career (with absences) the way Nadal allegedly has been. They are completely different players.
I agree with you that at age 29 with all that mileage there is going to be some physical and mental decline but IMO from what I am seeing right now with his game it appears to be more on the mental side of things.
We are going to find out in the next year. Sit tight.