Does Pat Cash still think Serena is a "Lost Cause?"

M

mx90

Guest
Pat Cash was relevant as a player in the mid 1980s but obviously he is not a tennis pundit at the level of Pam Shriver or John McEnroe. He was proven wrong by Serena Williams through her dominating performance at the 2007 Australian Open. And so nobody will have to worry about Pat Cash's thoughts on Serena Williams until next Australian Open.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Strewth! I called it wrong

Pat Cash is happy to eat humble pie after Serena Williams produces an awesome display of power tennis to win in Melbourne

Pat Cash

"AUSTRALIANS are not very good at admitting their mistakes. Maybe that’s because it doesn’t happen very often when sport is concerned, but I hold my hands up in apology, I got it wrong all ends up about Serena Williams. In my defence, I was not alone. Tracy Austin, who knows more about women’s tennis than me, laughed at the suggestion that the former world No 1 had a legitimate shot at climbing back to the top. Yet here are the two of us, and many more besides, eating humble pie after Serena collected a third Australian Open title to take her Grand Slam collection to eight.

What does this win mean, except for the fact I once again appreciate it’s a good job I don’t gamble because I would have put a lot of money on Serena not even being around for the second week of the tournament, let alone winning the whole thing? Foremost, it proves she is a a dynamic athlete and quite simply the strongest female player the game has ever known. It defies belief that she can turn up for a Grand Slam after playing just four tournaments in the past 12 months and win the thing. However, it reinforces my long-held view that there is a huge disparity between the relative strengths of the men’s and women’s games. For a woman to win a major title, no matter how talented and experienced she might be, on so little match play is a sad indictment of the WTA Tour.

This result also tells me that the young band of players — Nicole Vaidisova, Jelena Jankovic, Shahar Peer, Nadia Petrova, and even Maria Sharapova on the evidence of the final — are intimidated by Williams when she is focused on the job and brimful of determination. You have to admit, she must be a pretty awesome sight across the net when she is slamming winners.

People were shocked when Venus Williams got through to win the Wimbledon title in 2005, but this achievement eclipses even that. Just a few weeks ago, Serena turned up in Hobart for a minor warm-up tournament and lasted a couple of rounds before losing out to a player who was eliminated here within a couple of days.

I can understand why Serena allowed her concentration to wander into the worlds of acting and fashion. She lived and breathed little other than tennis for most of her teens and everybody needs time to break out. You also have to add the distress she felt when her half-sister was murdered in 2003. I lost a half-brother when I was a junior player and it was something I struggled to come to terms with for years. Now she is back and I hope that we see Serena contending at Roland Garros, Wimbledon and Flushing Meadows. I will not be making the same mistake again."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/tennis/article1267495.ece
 

norcal

Legend
I like how Pat pulls Tracy Austin under the bus with him.

Serena's serve in the final (and some of her semi) looked more like a guy's serve (it had direction, pace and bite) than any other woman's.
 

Slazenger

Professional
I like how Pat pulls Tracy Austin under the bus with him.

Serena's serve in the final (and some of her semi) looked more like a guy's serve (it had direction, pace and bite) than any other woman's.

Serena's serve has always been like that.
Go and watch the 2001 US Open Semifinal of Serena vs Hingis which Serena won 6-3, 6-2.
In the second set her 1st serve percentage was 100%
And she was pummelling those serves not spinning them in. A LOT of them were aces and unreturnables. She didn't double fault the entire match.

The girl has the best serve OF ALL TIME in the WTA.
 

Nick Irons

Semi-Pro
The WTA will be in a sad state without Davenport, Capriati and the Williams girls; the power game. Let's hope Serena is back for real, even though I'm not a fan

-

I don't think any of the critics were wrong about their assessment of Serena; they all had valid reason to ask "What the hell is she doing?'
 
M

mx90

Guest
Where did Pat Cash give this interview or was it an editorial for a newspaper? At any rate, he just proves how irrelevant he is as a pundit all over again. And the fact that he tried to knock Serena Williams' Australian Open victory by putting down all the players that she beat is sad and pathetic. How does he know that they were all intimidated by her? Perhaps Maria Sharapova was in the final, however, Petrova and Peer had their chances to win -- Serena's determination to fight them demonstrated her excellence as a tennis champion particularly at Grand Slam events. Moreover, Cash's attempt to slam Tracy Austin (no great pundit either) is just hilarious. Of course she knows more about women's tennis than he does, that doesn't mean she knows everthing about women's tennis. She was a baseliner in the 1970s and early 1980s, the game has changed from her time on court and she's often wrong about the Williams sisters and Martina Hingis. Finally, thankfully Pat Cash does not work as a TV tennis pundit on American television. Let's hope that Tracy Austin continues to work as a TV tennis pundit as little as possible -- hire Pam Shriver and John McEnroe.
 
Top